OK - now in Jeffrey Epstein (estate) case, Farmer v. Indyke, a proceeding. Inner City Press, which has asked the UN without answer about its with Ghislaine Maxwell (Terramar / @AntonioGuterres Dossal) & Epstein (IPI/Norway) will live tweet - thread
@SDNYLIVE Judge Freeman is asking why Ghislaine Maxwell needs to know how much was paid to Epstein's victims through the program.
Lawyer for Maria Farmer does not want to give extra info to Ghislaine Maxwell.
Maxwell wants a release to use in another court - a document without a redaction.
Maxwell's lawyer Laura Menniger: We are suing the [Epstein] estate for indemnification, in the Virgin Islands.
Note: McCawley says she is representing ANNIE Farmer.
Here is the Dec 8, 2020 letter about voluntary dismissal of Farmer v. Indyke, Kahn and Ghislaine Maxwell in the run up to today's proceeding
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK - in Roy Moore v Sasha Baron Cohen case, now another proceeding before @sdnylive Judge Cronan. Inner City Press has covered the case innercitypress.com/sdny3mooreklay… and will live tweet - thread
CBS / Borat lawyer: We are proposing a protective order like one agreed to by @sdnylive Judge Koeltl... It would cover commercially sensitive business info, private information, and information confidential by contract. Here, we want it to cover the entire action
CBS/Borat lawyer: We want it to cover info about the development of the show, and financial info and marketing plans.
Moore's lawyer Klayman: Court proceedings are to be in the public. This is not a Wall Street case - this is non complex
OK - in #OneCoin case, now proceeding of Sebastian Greenwood before @sdnylive Judge Ramos. Inner City Press covered the Mark Scott trial and will live tweet - thread
AUSA: We have requested a stay, to try to work out a disposition.
Greenwood's lawyer: Correct. Plus, we're going through a lot of discovery material. Meeting my client is difficult, given the circumstances. I don't know how the jail permits who gets visits
Greenwood's lawyer Barket: I had a few visit, then they stopped. I have three or four other clients in the facility and I can't meet any of them. We speak on the phone - once - and setting up the video conferencing has been difficult. It was easier in the summer
"Copyright troll" Richard Liebowitz has his problems - but his law firm is about to win a case (by default) - a hearing is being held now. It involves a Brooklyn-based photographers photo of an arrest for subway assault. Possible thread
The judge asks if the law firm has spoken with anyone at "Sell It Social," the defendant.
Lawyer: Possible Mr. Liebowitz did.
[Before November 25, 2020, presumably].
Sell It Social is out of business. But the web site it's being sued for it still up, lawyer says
Here is the website that the Liebowitz law firm has sued: rebelcircus.com
OK - in Steve Bannon SDNY case, Judge Torres' law clerk is taking appearances - Inner City Press is covering the case innercitypress.com/sdny10bannonic… and will live tweet it - thread below
Judge Torres: I understand that for Mr. Bannon, Mr. Burck [of Quinn Emanuel] is withdrawing, and Mr. Costello is making his appearance?
Burck: Yes.
Judge Torres: You are relieved. Will the [remaining] attorneys make their appearances?
AUSAs Moe, Roos and Sobelman
Judge Torres now reading script of the new Due Process Protection Act signed by President Trump in October, amending Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f).
AUSA: The discovery is very extensive. We loaded the drives, at least the ones the defendants provided
OK - it's Citibank Revlon wire transfer trial, Day 6 and last: the closing arguments. Inner City Press has been covering it daily- & uploading exhibits patreon.com/posts/44976505 (some more of which are still being withheld) Thread below; song soundcloud.com/innercitypress…
Judge Furman begin with questions about the Banque Worms decision.
There's some talk about getting a phone charger. Counsel classily presses on. It's not easy being a court reporter.
Judge Furman: Page 47 of Plaintiff's brief argues the District Court erred...
Closing arguments still going. Lot of talk of imputed knowledge; Judge Furman asks if there's any excited utterance showing the defendants knew something was wrong, even before Citibank notified them. Judge Furman also asks why Citibank didn't get a grace period