1/@tculpan and I wrote a @bopinion post about supply chains!

Basically, Trump really screwed the pooch on this one, but we still need to do something about the fact that our supply chains are highly dependent on China.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/Joe Biden has also vowed to reshore our supply chains. For stuff we need in an emergency, that makes sense. But for a lot of stuff, it doesn't. We're not going back to the days when countries made most things in-house.

joebiden.com/build-back-bet…
3/The U.S. is still going to be good at the things it's good at. Capital-intensive businesses with lots of innovation (plus farming). We're not going back to an economy based on low-skilled assembly work -- nor should we.
4/Trump's Foxconn failure in Wisconsin was a perfect demonstration of how badly the "just move everything back to America" approach is destined to fail.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
5/And, like...would we want to do that kind of work, even if we could?

This is low-value, low-margin stuff.
6/Now, we CAN lure a lot of foreign investment in things like semiconductor manufacturing. Like TSMC's plant in Arizona.

That's good for our economy. But it's capital-intensive stuff that isn't going to create a lot of jobs.
6/So...where are we going to get jobs for the masses?

Services, mostly. Luckily Biden understands this.

joebiden.com/caregiving/
7/So that's our economy -- the capital-intensive knowledge industry stuff, including high-tech automated manufacturing, brings in the $$ from overseas, and most of us do service stuff here at home.

But OK, what do we do with those supply chains in China??
8/Answer: We relocate those supply chains out of China, and into countries that A) are allied with the U.S., and B) need the investment.

Taiwan, Vietnam, Indonesia, India, Philippines, Bangladesh, Mexico.
9/Our investment in these countries can be an alternative to what China is offering.
10/Globalized supply chains are here to stay. We just have to make sure that they're based as much as possible in allied countries, and that the money they generate is equitably distributed in the U.S.

(end)

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noah Smith 🐇

Noah Smith 🐇 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Noahpinion

18 Dec
1/Today's @bopinion post is about a rare weak point in the Chinese economic model: China's difficulty in doing foreign deals.

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/In recent years, China's economic model has seemed to go from strength to strength. Many now wonder if Chinese state-capitalism is superior to other systems.

adamtooze.substack.com/p/chartbook-ne…
3/But China's model has had one big, notable failure in recent years: the Belt and Road project.

China planned to loan other countries a bunch of money to do infrastructure projects. It didn't work out so well...

bloomberg.com/quicktake/chin…
Read 21 tweets
18 Dec
I have to say, this really worries me.

I don't want conservatives to be pro-America and progressives to be anti-America. A future where that is the political divide is not a good future.
First of all it worries me because it seems likely to hurt progressives electorally. If they're anti-America and average voters are pro-America, even if only symbolically or rhetorically, it means progressives are going to be fighting an uphill battle...
Second, it worries me because if progressive activists don't believe in America, what entity do they think is going to solve all these problems we're facing? If they're placing their hopes on replacing America with some other entity or entities, they're not on a road to success.
Read 5 tweets
17 Dec
My guess: After 2012 the big fear was that Hispanics would be a permanent Dem constituency. That fear should have put Rubio in charge of the GOP; instead it lead to the Trumpian backlash. Now, Trump's gains with Hispanics have reassured them...
This type of partisan fear -- that immigration represents vote-importing by the other party, and will lead to permanent demographic drowning at the ballot box -- is a very old phenomenon in American society.

You might say that this is one of the constants of American politics. Immigrants and their kids tend to vote more for one party than the other. This raises fears of demographic drowning among the other party, which then seeks to restrict immigration...
Read 10 tweets
16 Dec
1/Someone on Twitter asked me what my top three priorities to boost American material prosperity would be.

So I wrote a @bopinion post about it.

They are:
1. National health insurance
2. Cheap housing
3. Sectoral bargaining for stronger unions

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/There are a lot of big policy ideas floating around this country. All of them on the political left, I should note.

Universal basic income, a federal $15 minimum wage, a job guarantee, child benefits, free college...

So why did I pick these three?
3/Let's start with national health insurance.

Our health care system is just a total mess. It's a source of terror, of catastrophe, of massive expense. It's hideously inefficient. It lags behind all the other rich countries.

commonwealthfund.org/publications/i…
Read 15 tweets
15 Dec
My three top policy priorities for restoring the middle class would be:

1. National health insurance (lower Medicare age to 0)

2. Cheaper housing (various policies)

3. Sectoral wage bargaining

bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
@jdcmedlock what u think?
With health security, cheaper health care, cheap housing, and higher wages, Americans wouldn't have ALL their economic problems solved, but they'd breathe a hell of a lot easier.
Read 4 tweets
15 Dec
Me: Countries should all lay down their arms and live in peace. Arms races will destroy us all.

Also me: Why can't we have a gigantic supersonic nuclear bomber like the Russians have?
And stop telling me the B-1 is our version of this plane...the B-1 is much smaller and slower.

news.yahoo.com/bomber-deathma…
The real awesome superbomber was the XB-70, which we didn't put into mass production, but which was much awesomer and better than any of the bombers that ever did get used, including the TU-160 which came out much later.

wired.com/2010/12/meet-t…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!