How S&P inclusion bursts the Tesla bubble:

Ever since June (at $200/share), Tesla stock has been driven by a perpetual motion machine of hype and call option flows -- nothing more. And everyone knows it.

Here's what not everyone knows:
When a stock joins the S&P 500, it becomes part of a massive volatility complex, which is a terrifying web of arbitrage and pseudo-arbitrage relationships. Tesla will join the index as a top-ten component of a cap-weighted index. It's big.
Its bigness will allow all manner of dispersion, relative value, and market-making traders to begin relying on Tesla's newfound correlation to the index. This will invariably cause arbitrageurs to buy SPX options/vol and sell TSLA options/vol to "close the spread."
Since Tesla stock is driven by the returns on call options, it is a slave to "vanna": the relationship between option prices (implied volatility) and delta (stock exposure).

In other words, since June, $TSLA goes up only when implied volatility (IV) goes up (purple line is IV).
When Tesla joins the index, these historic call option flows and the hype machine behind them will hit the big red fire truck that is the S&P, at 500mph

Implied volatility will be unable to rise. Call options will bleed value. New flows will be absorbed by real traders.
With the call option hype trade hampered, the stock will have no possibility of further returns -- a deliciously ironic end to the ugliest of @RobinhoodApp's many ugly children.

And an appropriately ironic fate for Tesla -- a victim of its own "success."

Enjoy!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SqueezeMetrics

SqueezeMetrics Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SqueezeMetrics

24 Nov
Blue line is the mean 1-month return associated with DIX. Returns are normalized to VIX to isolate signal. E.g., with VIX at 20, a 0.5 MAD return would be +4.6%.

Red line is the VIX-implied mean absolute deviation (MAD). Above 1.0, VIX was cheap. Below 1.0, VIX was expensive. Image
Between 38% and 46%, where nearly all the data clusters, a clear, linear relationship is apparent. Higher prints are more bullish.

At the extremes, where there is little data to sample, there are anomalies. These tend to be periods of market stress or extreme option positioning.
(For instance, the huge gains associated with 36% DIX are all from the pre-Volmaggedon (1/2018) S&P 500, where call overwriters were short-squeezed into oblivion.

Owing to the clarity of the relationship where data is *abundant*, this seems like a true anomaly. Grain of salt.)
Read 5 tweets
16 Sep
It's been a while since we've posted a scandalous question, so here's a doozy.

Regarding VIX and the front-month VIX future (VX1), which statement is more accurate?
So, this was a really bad poll, and here's why:

There are going to be two types of respondents, (1) those who implicitly believe that "convergence" refers to TIME, and (2) those who implicitly believe that "convergence" refers to PRICE.
If you think we're talking about TIME, then this devolves quickly into a philosophical debate about whether spot ("now") actually moves through time toward the forward contract, or whether forward contracts move toward the present.

Mkay.
Read 9 tweets
14 Apr
Volatility skew implies gains are more likely than losses.

You have two hours.
Thank you to 1,000 respondents for tolerating this strange, ambiguous poll.

There's a theoretical problem here. In the case of a skewed distribution, either the median or the mean can be zero, but not both.

Do options say the mean or median is zero?
Most respondents, by simply allowing that skew could *possibly* predict median gains, are saying that option prices are centered on a mean anticipated return rather than a median.

This means options are "implying" that index upside is always more likely. That's interesting.
Read 6 tweets
10 Jan
@Barton_options GEX is Gamma Exposure: squeezemetrics.com/download/white…

SPX Component GEX is the aggregate GEX of S&P 500 components (AAPL, AMZN, BAC, etc.), measured in 1% moves, and denominated in dollars.

It can be found here -> dix.sqzme.co
@Barton_options While it implicitly emphasizes the GEX values of stocks like the FAANGs (due to the high open interest in those names), it is dwarfed by the size of the gamma coming from CBOE's SPX index options.

That said, it correlates strongly to SPX index gamma.
@Barton_options Right now, two things have caused Component GEX to reach for the sky.

1. The January option expiration is next week, so the gamma from January LEAPS (lots of OI) is elevated.

2. The market is going berserk, because reasons. So more calls are ATM, so gamma is higher.
Read 6 tweets
14 Jun 19
Another excerpt from the Sunday note.

Traders will have noticed that $SPX has hardly moved at all this week (+0.45% right now). As usual, GEX is the proximate reason.
The speed with which the market flips from high- to low-volatility still continues to catch traders off-guard. People think that volatility should do what their GARCH models say -- smoothly mean-revert. But it doesn't. It jumps.
And it's not as if the evidence hasn't been there. When we first introduced the GEX white paper, we noted that "15 VIX" doesn't have much practical forecasting value. Which, when looking at the plot of GXV by SPX, makes perfect sense.

"15 vol" never happens.
Read 5 tweets
9 Apr 19
At just 30mm shares, $TSLA short interest is pretty low for a company that many smartish folks believe is minutes from bankruptcy.

Why?

1/5
The answer is that many of the $TSLAQ cadre have chosen to express their opinions specifically by means of OTM puts, which have low cost, but also low probability of profit. For "betting on zero," though, they are the ideal instrument, allowing for maximum leverage.

2/5
Interestingly, these puts foist a hedging obligation on $TSLA option dealers. If share price falls, they will need to short more shares to re-hedge -- and as "bona-fide market-makers," they are permitted to short naked (i.e., without securing a borrow).

3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!