@RadioFreeTom @rkylesmith @ConceptualJames 1/
If you think my views are about social envy I suggest you read "The Critical Turn in Education" by Isaac Gottesman. He lays out, Approvingly, the way in which education theory has come to be dominated by a blend postmodernsim and critical theory. I think this is bad.
@RadioFreeTom @rkylesmith @ConceptualJames 2/
I also spent 8 years getting 2 degrees, so while social envy is a candidate for explaining my motives, I see my concern as grounded in things as the most cited scholar in education being Paulo Friere, who is cited more then Richard Dawkins and Charles Darwin combined:
@RadioFreeTom @rkylesmith @ConceptualJames 3/
If you want to see some of what Henry Giroux (120K Citations) has to say here he is arguing in "Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education" that reason and objectivity are mere forms of social power. Again, I think this is very bad.
@RadioFreeTom @rkylesmith @ConceptualJames 4/
I do not want postmodernism to become the worldview that is inculcated into our young people via education. I do no want to see the Neo-marxist paradigm used in schools either. This is precisely what Giroux argues for explicitly.

I think this is extremely bad.
@RadioFreeTom @rkylesmith @ConceptualJames 5/
If noting that the dominant pedagogy taught in schools of education today is critical pedagogy, which the most cited scholars in the field say is built around postmodernism, critical theory, and Neo-marxism, then I guess anyone who goes against that is a social loser.
@RadioFreeTom @rkylesmith @ConceptualJames 6/
My preference is that the institutions which train public school teachers should keep doing that and not get hollowed out and appropriated so they can be used produce critical theorists with a postmodern view of the world. Again, letting that happen would be bad.
@RadioFreeTom @rkylesmith @ConceptualJames 7/
If the argument is a non expert is unable to judge the merits of a dissertation that might be a good argument, but since the experts in the field of education keep saying they're proponents of critical pedagogy built from postmodernism and critical theory. I believe them.
@RadioFreeTom @rkylesmith @ConceptualJames 8/
And I would further argue that while I would be the first to admit I have no business granting degrees and giving dissertations, I absolutely and capable of reading and understanding these papers, and understanding the methods and standards they are using.
@RadioFreeTom @rkylesmith @ConceptualJames 9/
And when the method is critical theory and the standards are postmodern I think I'm justified in rejecting what's being taught.

In any case, the field of education is rife with this and it's scholarly record is filled with it. This is going to take *decades* to clean up...
@RadioFreeTom @rkylesmith @ConceptualJames 10/
If you wish to call me bitter for pointing this rather unpleasant truth out, so be it.

Stay well Mr. Nichols.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wokal Distance

Wokal Distance Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wokal_distance

18 Dec
1/
The woke are trying to politicize the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine.

There is no other way to say this: if they succeed people *WILL* die.

A thread🧵 Image
2/
According to both "The Lancet", a well respected scientific journal, and the Center for Evidence Based Medicine, the group most likely to die from COVID-19 is the elderly.

It isn't even close.

By every metric Seniors are the people who are most likely to die from COVID. ImageImageImageImage
3/
This is not new information. The fact that COVID targets the elderly has been known since March.Anthony Fauci even said so in the New England Journal of Medicine.

So the medical community knows this. They know the people most likely to die from COVID are Seniors. ImageImage
Read 14 tweets
17 Dec
Imagine letting old people die because they're the wrong skin color and you want to rectify a historical injustice.

Now imagine being a doctor and actively advocating for that.
She suggests we should consider allocating healthcare resources using a *lottery.*

Allocating life saving resources using a lottery) is deeply irresponsible. The numbers clearly show the elderly are the most vulnerable, they should be vaccinated first after front-line workers.
Historical injustices are bad, but trying to rectify an inequality through a lottery is absurd. Resource allocation via lottery may mean healthy people in a vulnerable community may be vaccinated before elderly people in that same community. That makes things worse, not better.
Read 6 tweets
11 Dec
1/
A huge mistake people make is to think of postmodernism, post-structuralism, intersectionality, Critical Legal Studies, Critical Race Theory, 4th wave feminism, and Critical Theory as being separate and distinct, having nothing to do with each other

This is a massive mistake.
2/
These disciplines are connected. They are not like individual academic factories producing different theories. The fact is that the ideas that are produced in various disciplines cross-pollinate and influence each other. The theorists make use of and share each others ideas.
3/
These fields are akin to ingredients used by activists to make the stew of Critical Social Justice.

Mix some postmodernism here with some intersectionality there, add Critical Race Theory and 4th wave feminist post-structuralism and *taste test* YUMMY...Social Justice!👨‍🍳
Read 25 tweets
6 Dec
1/
This is exactly what @jordanbpeterson addresses when he talks about "the call to adventure" and "fighting off dragons." and the entire elite class has opted ignore him, laugh, and hand the culture to people who want to 'deconstruct masculinity" in the name of "social Justice."
2/
Then, when in the most predictable way possible it goes wrong in all the ways you might expect it to, people laugh, antagonize, mock and pile on.

They laugh, make fun, point fingers, and then put fourth a buffet of things that don't work. They offer no compelling answers...
3/
Stating "personal responsibility" while still continuing to advocate a combination of crass libertarianism and zombie Reaganism that leaves people without a direction or any sort of guidance is going to fail, and it is going to be laughed at.

No one cares.
Read 12 tweets
5 Dec
1/
Imagine thinking a 5 year old is capable of understanding the consequences of "choosing" which sex they are.

Imagine everyone in that kids life affirming the decision of a 5 year old in a way reinforces the decision and shapes the child socially....
2/
Imagine social momentum created by the decision to "affirm" the child:
-their name changed
-pronouns are changed
-appearance is adjusted i cludong clothing choices, hair-style amd mannerisms.
-everyone who meets them is told they are their newly "chosen" gender...
3/
Pretty soon everyone who doesn't agree with the change is removed from the kids life "to protect them," and the parents become activists within the community with social media profile built around "being the parents of a trans kid."

They join local and online support groups
Read 14 tweets
3 Dec
This is correct!
We must dismantle our electoral fragility if we want to engage in the work of being anti-fraud. A "fair" election is not enough, the election process must be anti-fraud.
Election processes that aren't anti-fraid are fraudulent.
The problem is that all elections are "rigged from the beginning" making them fraudulent. This fraud makes electoral equity impossible. If we want to ensure that votes are equitably distributed then it is not enough for elections to be fair, theu must be aggreively anti-fraud.
We must dismantle electoral systems which allow for an unequal distribution of votes among the candidates.
The notion that elections must have a "winner" who "takes office" is rooted in capitalist notions of competition and colonial notions of siezing power through sheer numbers
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!