23/ as Papadop interview approaches, Strzok and Boone (the two ADs) chat. Strzok expects Papadop to name Carter Page or Manafort as secret conduit to Russia. I don't view Strzok as malevolent, but as someone living in a totally paranoid fantasy, whose judgement was appalling.
24/ 😂🔥 this is rich. FBI was ("FYSA") listening to Papadop and his mother in the Papadopoulos home in real time. His mother told him not to go to FBI office. Strzok snickered: "That's what you get for not listening to mom...;)"
25/ texts presumably related to Papadop had already been obtained
26/ on Jan 27 6 pm (EST), they learn that Papadop said that "Joseph Mifsud stated to TYPHOON it was the "Russians" who had the e‐mails". Hans Mahncke has long argued that Papadop composed this to please/distract FBI or simply because he has loose connection to reality.
27/ by Jan 30, in a text beginning "FYSA", they state that they had already opened some sort of surveillance on Mifsud. (Recall that Mueller lied to court that Papadop's false statement had had material impact on investigation.) Pap lies, but so did Mueller.
More later. It is crazy that this material has been concealed so long.
On Feb 1 and Feb 2, Chicago agent (prob Heide) texted updates to Strzok in real time. These texts all appear to come from same agent. FYSA - military: for your situational awareness. Nothing to do with FISA.
29/ 302 for Feb 1 interview is in Vault Volume 4, p74. Curtis Heide was SA. Papadop did internet search on Mifsud and Russia, further feeding FBI fantasies. Papadop said that Mifsud introduced Olga as a student and it was Nagi Idris who "grumbled" that she was "Putin's niece".
30/ Mueller Report stated that "Mifsud introduced Polonskaya as a former student of his who had connections to Vladimi Putin", citing Papadop's Aug 10, 2017 interview. However, by August, Papadop was composing wildly and even Mueller thugs unconvinced by some of his ravings.
31/ in the Feb 1 interview, Papadop was asked about Millian and told FBI that Millian had told him that he had no knowledge of information sourced to him and that the dossier claims about him were untrue. Papadop believed him. Mueller concealed this info exculpatory to Millian.
32/ on Feb 10, FBI interviewed Mifsud. Moffa observed afterwards that it "might have been good to, like, have a plan, come up with the right questions". Wait until Pap interviews done. uh, d'oh.
33/ Mueller later lied to Court that Papadop's deceptions had materially damaged FBI interview of Mifsud. Real problem was FBI incompetence.
In fact, early on, before we had any documents, I speculated that FBI failed to ask right questions.
34/ one of the weird aspects of counts to which Papadop pled guilty is that he had logical technical defense to each of them. So why didn't he put up better defense? (Hans Mahncke had observed same phenomenon - which is how we first twitter met.)
35/ eventually, we concluded tht there was no actual injustice to Papadop in that he had lied, just that he lied on different things than he pled guilty to. And that he lied not just to FBI, but serially to Trump campaign and more recently to US public. Then composed for Mueller
36/ but on the issue of whether Papadop's lies about Mifsud timing were material lies to FBI investigation, Mueller lied to the court. They didn't matter a damn.
37/ on Feb 9, there are important new Strzok texts about Washington Post. But first, readers should recall that killshot on Flynn was Feb 9 WaPo article archive.is/5hOg7 stating that, based on multiple leaks, Flynn had talked about SANCTIONS.
38/ all readers of this thread will be familiar with fact that explusions and sanctions were different measures taken on Dec 29 and that Flynn talked about expulsions, but NOT about sanctions. And that Strzok didnt ASK about "sanctions". So leaks were a lie.
39 (replacement): Strzok notified by FBI's Richard Quinn (of Director's Office) that he had met with WaPo- almost certainly leaking Flynn information to decapitate Flynn. Strzok's Counterintelligence in charge of catching leakers. No wonder he didn't catch any.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
40/ it also looks like McCabe was separately leaking (false information) to WaPo about Flynn. He resigned almost immediately after this sabotage.
41/ during this resistance period, Strzok was breaking bad. As he became increasingly obsessed, one of his friends sagely observed "it looks like entire future credibility of the FBI is sitting on your shoulders". It did indeed. Unfortunately, Strzok was wrong about everything
42/ a dig here: on Feb 23, Brian Boetig, the FBI Legat from London who filed initial report on Downer's conversation with DCM Dibble about Papadopoulos leading to CH, checked in. Wonder what it was about.
A new drop of FBI texts hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…. Chuck Ross, one of the few reporters who consistently covers the Russiagate hoax, has a good article.
on Jul 28 afternoon, Strzok wants to talk to Lisa about "our open CI investigations relating to Trump's Russian connections". Weren't we repeatedly told that such investigations began with opening of Crossfire Hurricane? (Tho Carter Page and Manafort obviously earlier.)
on Sep 20, Nuland was having off-book dinner with Senator Corker, before whom she'd appeared on Senate Foreign Relations Committee. (Nuland had been repeated recipient of off-book Steele "reports" on Ukraine in previous 2 years.)
David Blake's recent book Loaded for Guccifer contains lengthy discussion of how NATO lobbied to expand definition of "war" to include ordinary hacking and surveillance - which are VERY hard to attribute.
2/ an important downside of expanded definition is that it creates much expanded incentive for false flag provocations. Blake argues that many, if not all, of the outrageously noisy and too-obvious cyber incidents since 2016 are false flags by parties who benefit from tension
3/ an important example of how a policy can create an incentive for false flags is Obama's famous "red line" on chemical attacks in Syria. Since Obama's policy was announced, one of major "business lines" of Al Qaeda and allied Syrian jihadis has been staged chemical incidents
the recent HGSAC documents (DOJ subset) hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/… contained the following seemingly uninformative email, which turns out to shed interesting new light on both Horowitz, Bruce Ohr and the Alfa Bank hoax.
2/ a routine search of names in the email showed that Maxwell Marker was the TOC-East Section Chief identified in Horowitz Report as one of Bruce Ohr's two original contacts. So let's re-examine Horowitz with new info in mind.
3/ Simpson contacted DOJ #3 Ohr on Aug 22, 2016 and immediately got access. Simpson purported to identify 3 possible intermediaries in the collusion hoax originated by Steele operation. Ohr talked to Gaeta, but, as usual, neither "recalled" anything. MMarker mentioned.
New York City publishes "syndromic surveillance" data recording all Emergency Department visits which is up-to-date (to within ~10 days). Data is surprising given recent surge is reported COVID cases. a816-health.nyc.gov/hdi/epiquery/v…
Here's their plot of ED visits for respiratory diseases by week. End values are, annoyingly, artifacts of incomplete reporting. I re-plotted data without annoying artifact.
During spring COVID epidemic, NYC Emergency departments were (as reported in real time) overwhelmed. Reported new cases in NY state now higher than in spring, COVID hospitalizations reaching similar levels but NYC respiratory ED visits ~50% LOWER than an ordinary year. Strange.
David Blake argues that nascent psy-op operation is a false flag. He is author of recent, very interesting book Loaed for Guccifer (amazon.com/dp/B08MSZHMGP?…) which argues that Russiagate hoax was an even more broad-reaching false flag than thus far understood.
2/ no sooner does David Blake predict false flag operation than Ellen Nakashima, outlet for original Crowdstrike article on DNC hack on Jun 15, 2016, is stenographer for intel community pearl clutching