As the absurd number (~65%) in the HI myth is way over those willing to vax (only 25% enthusiasts), they will need to force people to. Doing it directly is unconstitutional, thus ugly blackmail and threaten appears plausible, in the shape of restrictions for the 'negationists'.
There's the mood for bannings on those refusing Vax, like no access to public transport, lose of economic public aids, maintaining masks as a terrible mark of the infectious...
We've seen a lot of rights destroyed, but this would be a dangerous rule change.
We CAN'T accept it
I've been, still, a firm pro Vax, as a rational cost/benefit advantage is clear, but I'm a firmer personal freedom defender.
Vaccination must come from a rational informed decision of the citizen and it's NOT acceptable any kind of medical ghettos whatever the reason.
There's no ethics, no gov authority to make sick, suspicious or healthy person list.
Can you magine society criticism at an AIDS list?
It would have been disgusting and unacceptable, covid hasn't change that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As this round has been made under masks mandatory, we can check how many of the participants were infected, under declared different masks usage: never, sometimes, always
The group with LESS infections was those NEVER using a mask, 3% Vs 3.8% ALWAYS users.
Masks are NOT working
You have 25% MORE chance of getting infected always using a mask than never using it.
Those partially accomplishing show similar, slightly higher, to mask wearers, 3,9% infections.
The restrictions we're applying are WEAKENING those vulnerable Isolation is proven a weaker for the oldies, it causes suffer, stress and life expectancy loss in the older, as all the good pre covid science knows
Living stressing situations alone, is worsening old people's health
Restrictions are ALSO worsening the rest of population health thru brutal health care access, intolerable levels of fear and stress and general poverty.
Education loss, preventive medicine and misery have a huge cost on lifes expectancy for them all.
Being numbers of infected so small and similar (42vs53) the confidence margin lead to a cloud of possibilities in which the most probable is NO DIFFERENCE at all.
Statistical extremes are masks being ~40% effective OR even ~20% perjuditial.
Masks aren't saving humanity.
We all have seen this crappy pure fictional graphs as science. They never were
Now we've the truth
The BEST, even so unlikely, mask benefit is only ~40%.
But the most likely, as science knew, is that NO DIFFERENCE shows. They're useless.
Covid paranoic narrative has stand from the very beginning in IGNORANCE.
We don't know, that's always the answer.
We scientifically DID know a lot: epidemics, respiratory viruses, coronavirus.
Then we quick learn A HUGE LOT on cv19.
We're just forced to pretend we don't know.
There's no troll claiming this universal need of ignorance: I don't know equals nobody does, it doesn't matter u being the science schooling. Ignorance must be defended.
And so, everything becomes new and concerning.
Curiously we're demanded infinite faith on covid full paraphernalia.
Restrictions, which have no evidence at all working, neither in pre, nor in post covid science, MUST be done.
'Young healthy people dies/suffers horrible sequels' is statistically false, but we act like is truth
To cover the FACT that restrictions are blatantly doing nothing on epidemic develope, press and politics have applied the perverse blaming game reasoning:
When numbers are good, it's restrictions working.
When they go bad, IRRESPONSIBLE citizens are to blame.
So, Madrid restrictions are miraculous working because they're fine; but SAME restrictions, with some harder ones added, FAILING in Catalonia are definitely because of irresponsible citizenship.
Astounding how much of the population buys this shit: social suspiciousness rises.
That childish egocentric mentality shows up in polls.
Asked for self degree of norm accomplish, people value themselves 8.9/10
They consider the rest only doing 5.4/10
Truth, accomplish is high&even: this cognitive dissonance avoids a terrible fact. Restrictions don't work