Spain's gov will collect data of those vaccinated AND those refusing vax and the reasons why.

This is the dangerous and certain road for punish the dissident, and it's definitely off borders on civil rights.

Covid seems to have killed them too.

niusdiario.es/sociedad/sanid…
As the absurd number (~65%) in the HI myth is way over those willing to vax (only 25% enthusiasts), they will need to force people to. Doing it directly is unconstitutional, thus ugly blackmail and threaten appears plausible, in the shape of restrictions for the 'negationists'.
There's the mood for bannings on those refusing Vax, like no access to public transport, lose of economic public aids, maintaining masks as a terrible mark of the infectious...

We've seen a lot of rights destroyed, but this would be a dangerous rule change.

We CAN'T accept it
I've been, still, a firm pro Vax, as a rational cost/benefit advantage is clear, but I'm a firmer personal freedom defender.

Vaccination must come from a rational informed decision of the citizen and it's NOT acceptable any kind of medical ghettos whatever the reason.
There's no ethics, no gov authority to make sick, suspicious or healthy person list.

Can you magine society criticism at an AIDS list?

It would have been disgusting and unacceptable, covid hasn't change that.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with plaforscience

plaforscience Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @plaforscience

20 Dec
The 4th round of Spain's big serologic survey has been aired in the expected childish commercial way: ONLY 10% infected, not enough for herd Immunity.

It is INDEED much more to analyse there, but it's not very supportive for fear narrative.

Let's check.

portalcne.isciii.es/enecovid19/inf…
As this round has been made under masks mandatory, we can check how many of the participants were infected, under declared different masks usage: never, sometimes, always

The group with LESS infections was those NEVER using a mask, 3% Vs 3.8% ALWAYS users.

Masks are NOT working Image
You have 25% MORE chance of getting infected always using a mask than never using it.

Those partially accomplishing show similar, slightly higher, to mask wearers, 3,9% infections.

PROVED way to minimize risk: never using a mask.

But they're full mandatory, where's science?!
Read 14 tweets
24 Nov
Herd Immunity is so BADLY understood, and subject of innumerable lies, misinformation and myths.

There's CONSTANT hammering on simple ideas from fear propaganda. Main lie is we haven't reach HI, we're far away from it, as we need a 60-70%

Let's bring some scientifical light.
HI is considered a binary issue, you have it or not. That's BLATANTLY a lie.

With EVERY SINGLE infection, HI grows&provides some degree of common protection, as any infected will die or, over 99%, survive.

Both ways he gets out of any transmission chain.
It will slow any epidemic transmission & make the Rt descend

Proportional to HI growth, spread ALSO slows

Even in the SO WRONG 70% theory, 5% diffusion will slow spread, bigger ones like 15 or 20 will SERIOUSLY affect it

The NON exponential growth, but Gompertz, reflects this
Read 9 tweets
22 Nov
Italy's life expectancy is 83 years, covid deaths average there is 82.
98% of them have 1 or more comorbilities

So, this epidemic is killing ONLY those very weak about to die

The myth of CV killing anyone is more than over. We MUST settle this truth before consider ANY policy ImageImage
The restrictions we're applying are WEAKENING those vulnerable Isolation is proven a weaker for the oldies, it causes suffer, stress and life expectancy loss in the older, as all the good pre covid science knows

Living stressing situations alone, is worsening old people's health
Restrictions are ALSO worsening the rest of population health thru brutal health care access, intolerable levels of fear and stress and general poverty.

Education loss, preventive medicine and misery have a huge cost on lifes expectancy for them all.
Read 5 tweets
18 Nov
Denmark masks study is finally out!

The result again, is a blown in the restrictions' face.

Only 0,3% less infections in the masked than in control group.

Masks didn't avoid infections significantly, and both gross present very similar SMALL numbers.

acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M2…
Being numbers of infected so small and similar (42vs53) the confidence margin lead to a cloud of possibilities in which the most probable is NO DIFFERENCE at all.
Statistical extremes are masks being ~40% effective OR even ~20% perjuditial.

Masks aren't saving humanity.
We all have seen this crappy pure fictional graphs as science. They never were

Now we've the truth

The BEST, even so unlikely, mask benefit is only ~40%.

But the most likely, as science knew, is that NO DIFFERENCE shows. They're useless.

&what if they're WORSE?!
Read 6 tweets
18 Nov
Covid paranoic narrative has stand from the very beginning in IGNORANCE.

We don't know, that's always the answer.
We scientifically DID know a lot: epidemics, respiratory viruses, coronavirus.
Then we quick learn A HUGE LOT on cv19.

We're just forced to pretend we don't know.
There's no troll claiming this universal need of ignorance: I don't know equals nobody does, it doesn't matter u being the science schooling. Ignorance must be defended.

And so, everything becomes new and concerning.
Curiously we're demanded infinite faith on covid full paraphernalia.
Restrictions, which have no evidence at all working, neither in pre, nor in post covid science, MUST be done.
'Young healthy people dies/suffers horrible sequels' is statistically false, but we act like is truth
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
The blaming game.

To cover the FACT that restrictions are blatantly doing nothing on epidemic develope, press and politics have applied the perverse blaming game reasoning:

When numbers are good, it's restrictions working.
When they go bad, IRRESPONSIBLE citizens are to blame.
So, Madrid restrictions are miraculous working because they're fine; but SAME restrictions, with some harder ones added, FAILING in Catalonia are definitely because of irresponsible citizenship.

Astounding how much of the population buys this shit: social suspiciousness rises.
That childish egocentric mentality shows up in polls.

Asked for self degree of norm accomplish, people value themselves 8.9/10
They consider the rest only doing 5.4/10

Truth, accomplish is high&even: this cognitive dissonance avoids a terrible fact. Restrictions don't work
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!