The study above, by @NiraPollock and others, is incredibly important because it proves that these tests do not care about your symptoms, they only care about the virus. And that they work in kids as well as adults.
The former issue is critically important...
2/
Currently @US_FDA requires that for these tests to be used at home OTC, they need to demonstrate explicitly that they work in asymptomatic people.
But this is completely unnecessarily burdensome - plus finding asymptomatic people shedding virus is very difficult!
3/
The study shows the test works in symptomatic and asymptomatic people to catch the virus. This makes sense!
The FDA should immediately stop requiring rapid test companies to redemonstrate the physiology of #COVID19. We know the virus grows in asymptomatics.
4/
If FDA relaxed this requirement - trialing specifically in contagious asymptomatics (hard to find!) - rapid test cos could greatly accelerate their EUA applications.
This would increase home access to these and similar rapid antigen tests and help control this virus.
5/5
Unfortunately this specific test is now going to be selling for $25 instead of $5. Which is truly unfortunate. But the study shows that rapid antigen paper strip tests can do exactly what we’ve been saying they can do... catch infectious people quickly and cheaply.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
First at-home rapid test w FDA EUA! This is a great milestone! Congratulations to @EllumeHealth on this triumph. The EUA for this at-home test should be celebrated. I am supportive & have used it myself! I want to put this in context...
This is a terrific milestone. An OTC rapid test is a great advance. It means some will have access to much needed test to help know status, without going through barriers of an MD.
Since many are asking, this is not quite THE public health screening test I'm calling for.
2/10
Inside, @Ellume (right) has simple but powerful paper strip test. It requires battery, circuits, sensors, and bluetooth with a mobile phone. Thus, not quite THE mass public health screening test that will scale for frequent use by millions (i.e. vs simple one on left).
On Wednesday I spoke first to the @Heritage Foundation and immediately after to the @NewDemCoalition
1/
Here is a link for the first talk, with the @Heritage Foundation - I believe there is a video recording of the event there, with @paulmromer and Doug Badger, moderated by Marie Fishpaw
One of my favorite scientific themes is the identification of within-host immune kinetics from population data.
The divergence of the curves following pfizer #COVID19 vaccine at around day 10 demonstrates perfectly the time required for antibody secreting cells to proliferate
Have a #COVID19 test results that took more than a few days after the swab was taken??
Throw it out and refuse to pay!
A lab result delayed more than a couple days isn’t just not useful, it’s misleading and dangerous!
A test with a 4+ day turnaround should have EUA revoked.
The only way it’s useful is if it’s positive. Remember, start the isolation clock from the time of the swab. Not the result.
Also, I’m not blaming the labs here. Im highlighting a massive systemic problem.
Though I will say that all clinical labs have a responsibility to accept only specimens that they can process within a clinically relevant time. A 7-day turnaround does more harm than good.