Ruth Fox Profile picture
19 Dec, 13 tweets, 5 min read
The deteriorating #Covid_19 situation raises important questions about the role of Parliament in the coming days. @HouseofCommons is adjourned until 5 Jan & it can only be recalled by the govt (my @HansardSociety blog explains why: hansardsociety.org.uk/blog/demands-t…) 🧵(1/12)
If the @HouseofCommons is recalled, due to #Covid or negotiations with the EU, there's no provision for virtual proceedings to apply to legislation. MPs can vote via proxy on SIs or a bill, but they can only participate in a debate on legislation if they are in the Chamber (2/12)
The only way currently for MPs to take part in a debate on Covid-SIs or a Bill enshrining a deal with the EU will be to travel to Westminster in Tier 4. Is this wise given the PMs statement about the severity of the situation and the announcements in Scotland & Wales? (3/12)
A temporary Order could have been agreed as a stand-by, in case it was needed, to facilitate a resumption of full virtual proceedings, to be implemented at the discretion of the Speaker. The @HansardSociety recommended this in the Summer. hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/s… (4/12)
But the govt has persistently failed to make contingency plans for a resurgence of the virus. The virtual technology cannot be used by MPs to debate Statutory Instruments or Bills remotely without them first having to meet physically to decide on such arrangements (5/12)
Given the time constraints, particularly to agree a bill enshrining a treaty with the EU, a motion for the immediate resumption of full virtual proceedings could be agreed. A quorum of 40 MPs (incl tellers & Speaker) would have to be present in the Chamber to secure it. (6/12)
But that will require the @CommonsLeader to lay such a motion before the House. He thinks virtual proceedings are ‘an imitation Parliament’ and MPs must do their duty & set an example by being at Westminster. Will he change his mind given the deteriorating Covid situation? (7/12)
The Covid Tiers/Xmas provisions were voted on by MPs so amending / overturning them without any parliamentary consideration until 5 January or later, raises serious questions about democratic scrutiny & accountability (8/12)
Any deal with the EU will be implemented via a Bill. Its contents will significantly influence the course of the UKs economic & foreign policy towards the EU for decades. In the limited time available as many MPs as possible should be able to take part in the debate. (9/12)
Technology could facilitate scrutiny by as many MPs as possible, and do so at low risk. Virtual proceedings are less satisfactory than normal parliamentary proceedings. But they are a necessary accommodation to circumstances to ensure the govt can be held to account. (10/12)
This once again reveals the extent to which the govt of the day can exercise an unacceptable degree of control over how the @HouseofCommons works. Only the govt can recall Parliament & only the govt can move a motion to facilitate full resumption of virtual proceedings. (11/12)
Erskine May states that @CommonsLeader has a ‘special responsibility’ to ensure business arrangements ‘have regard to what is right and proper in the interest of the House as a whole’. In the circumstances, it would be indefensible not to resume full virtual proceedings. (12/12)
In the debate about the role of Parliament & restoration of full virtual proceedings it's important to remember this is not just about MPs. More MPs in Westminster = more staff in Westminster. As @FDAGenSec, whose union represents some parly staff, notes

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ruth Fox

Ruth Fox Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RuthFox01

31 Jul
A Statutory Instrument subject to parliamentary procedure can’t be published until it has been laid before Parliament. If there are to be regulations rather than just guidance, then the minister can have signed them to bring them into force but .....(1/4)
..the rest of us won’t see them until they are laid before Parliament (ie delivered to the relevant office in each House this morning). I assume they will be like those for Leicester, Luton, Blackburn so made under powers in the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 (2/4)
They will be subject to the made affirmative scrutiny procedure and as such they will be a type of SI that can be laid before Parliament even tho both Houses are currently adjourned.(3/4)
Read 4 tweets
2 Jun
Ministers have talked a lot during this crisis of deploying ‘world leading’ measures to tackle the pandemic. Ironically, the #virtualparliament is world leading and yet today they want to scrap it
Remote participation across a range of proceedings in the Chamber & Select Committees, plus remote voting, has been delivered at speed and scale. What staff at Westminster have delivered surpasses what many other legislatures have achieved so far in this crisis.
But the government’s plans now risk turning the House of Commons from a global parliamentary leader in to an international laughing stock.
Read 23 tweets
28 Aug 19
Lots of discussion today about whether the length of #prorogation really matters given the upcoming party conference season. But conference recess hasn't been agreed. So we’ve crunched the numbers and yes, the length matters! (thread – 1/17!)
The government’s desire to bring this long session to an end and outline a new legislative programme in a Queen’s Speech could be met with a prorogation of one to two weeks. Anything longer than this is both unnecessary and beyond the norm. (2/17)
We do not yet know on which day between 9 and 12 September Parliament will be prorogued. The Order in Council states that it will be no earlier than Monday 9th September and no later than Thursday 12 September. (3/17)
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!