I read a thoughtful research note on platforms by @ckaiwu today. I will share my notes in this thread.
Number of platform companies has increased from 40 in 2008 to 100 in 2020 in $SPY.
2/ Not just public markets, there are ~500 private unicorn platforms many of which are likely to go public soon.
3/ Wait, I know it's a cliché, but how do you define a "platform"?
The image provides a brief context how Sparkline used Natural Language Processing (NLP) to define and score platforms.
Platform score isn't fixed for a company e.g. see how $AMZN score changed over the years.
4/ How have platform stocks done in the market?
On mcap basis, they have outperformed per annum by +8.7% in last 12 years. Even on equal weighted, that number is +8.1%.
From 10% in 2008, currently 37% of $SPY mcap is platform stocks.
5/ What were the drivers for such outsized return?
Sales growth.
Multiple expansion wasn't, in fact, a contributor until 2020. You can laugh at those sales multiples all you want, but this graph is rather compelling.
6/ How do these platforms create value?
"Platforms have been most successful disrupting industries with the following characteristics:
1. Inefficient gatekeepers 2. High fragmentation 3. Untapped supply"
7/ Of course, network effects play a huge role in driving value which was eloquently explained by Brian Arthur in his seminal work on "increasing returns on scale"
If this is the first time you are reading this, read twice.
The endgame for increasing returns is (quasi)monopoly.
8/ Network effects don't exhibit mean reversion, but they do face the risk of obsolescence.
Given the significance of scale for the platforms, TAM is much more relevant discussion than old economy stocks.
9/ Is the platform heyday behind us? The Pollyannish time of lax regulation and less responsibility are perhaps unlikely to persist.
1/8 I was listening to Sam Hinkie episode today at @InvestLikeBest, and paused here for a while.
Writing is not only one of the best leverage tools in the age of internet, it is also a great way to talk to yourself across time without the biases of selective memories.
2/8 One of the things that excites me most about building "MBI Deep Dives" is the trail of deep dives I will hopefully be writing in the next 5-10 years.
Will I be able to spot some of the big winners? Can I identify the long-term losers?
3/8 I will most certainly miss some of the big winners. I would love to figure out if there is a particular pattern among the companies I miss.
Will there be anything that I can do to reduce my errors of omission?
I ran a poll yesterday here asking the following question:
"What level of IRR would you be happy/satisfied with 10 years from now for your portfolio?"
~3k people responded, and ~54% of them said >10%.
2/9 I thought it was surprising that people are still expecting >10% IRR when ~$20 trillion bonds are trading at negative yield.
I understand people might have interpreted the question differently. Some might be "okay" with 7-8%, but would require >10% to be "happy".
3/9 At one hand, permabulls might be just extrapolating the recent equity returns. The narrative of roaring 20s has perhaps been permanently imprinted in their minds.
Danny Meyer is the founder and CEO of Union Square Hospitality Group as well as the founder and Chairman of $SHAK.
Here are my notes.
2/7 How do you make a restaurant a favorite one?
"We had to make you feel like we were on your side, which is hospitality, but then to take it a step further, we had to really make you feel like you belonged."
3/7 ABCD =Always Be Collecting Dots.
The desire to belong really resonates.
I found out fintwit last year. I used to lurk around here a lot, and thought this is SO cool. I wished I could be part of fintwit community. And I just started writing, and never stopped.
This one is packed with meaty insights. I wish it were a longer episode. At the very least, I hope @patrick_oshag invites Dan again.
Here are my notes.
2/ Asking people about their opinions on certain movies can reveal a lot about them. It's a fun, relaxing way to get to the answer you want to know, but much more difficult to ask in a direct manner.
3/ This is a simple point, but I have been surprised before how few people get it.
In creative pursuits, the delta between median and the peak is astonishingly large. It also means if you are slightly better than others in these pursuits, the convexity leads you to win big.