1/ Fui entrevistado semana passada pelo @CNNBrasil para um programa sobre #VazaJato. O produtor contou-me que entrevistou o suposto hacker, Walter Delgatti, que disse que desde o momento em que foi preso, foi agressivamente pressionado a me acusar de crimes em troca de liberdade.
2/ O programa da CNN ainda não foi transmitido. Mas @ConJur_Oficial hoje relata que viram uma cópia "antecipado" da entrevista de Delgatti com a CNN, e eles confirmam que ele disse exatamente isso. Veja:
3/ Lembre-se que quando isso aconteceu, a Polícia Federal estava nas mãos de . . . Sergio Moro. O MPF já provou que abusa de seu poder contra os inimigos de Moro.
E *esse* é o legado de Moro e Lava Jato: abusar da prisão preventiva para coagir falsas acusações e confissões.
4/ Ninguém fez mais para corromper o sistema de justiça brasileiro - ninguém - do que Sergio Moro. Além das trapaças e das ilegalidades que ele usou para condenar, instrumentalizou medidas autoritárias como essas em toda a Lava Jato. Ele contaminou todo o sistema jurídico.
(A entrevista com Delgatti saiu ontem. Ainda não vi, mas a reportagem da ConJur é o que a CNN me contou.)
Vai levar muito tempo para limpar o sistema de justiça do extremismo e da corrupção de Moro e LJ. Usar a prisão preventiva para obter confissões falsas é o oposto de justiça
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What kind of monstrous country goes around hacking into and spying on the government agencies of other nations?
It's unthinkable, rogue behavior that must be punished.
"The lack of self-awareness in reactions to the Russia breach is astounding. The US has no principled basis to complain about the Russia hack since the U.S. government hacks foreign government networks on a huge scale every day" - @jacklgoldsmith
What about the argument that because African-Americans and Latinos are harder hit by COVID, they should go before old whites? Doesn't this justify Rubio getting one?
Also, AOC, almost 20 years younger than Rubio, got vaccinated yesterday. Same people angry she went to the front?
We need and expect Congress to work, including by passing a COVID relief package. Anyone who society demands leave their house to work for the good of everyone should have priority to get a vaccine (such as Rubio, AOC, etc.), along with the highest-risk populations.
Anyone who works in journalism has heard for years that Rukmini Callimachi's reporting - not just on "Caliphate" but many stories - was shoddy, unreliable, unethical and often false. @ErikWemple examines how and why top NYT editors ignored these concerns:
Many of the loudest objections to Callimachi's work came from Muslims, Arabs & others from the region who actually speak its languages. They, as usual, were ignored. But they also came from other NYT journalists. But her rising star, awards & narrative-boosting subordinated all.
So ironic - and revealing - that the NYT being forced to retract much of its award-winning "Caliphate" podcast came days after the Guardian op-ed warning of the dangers of "sinister" podcasts spreading "disinformation" - meaning not the NYT but Joe Rogan. theguardian.com/media/2020/dec…
After 2020, do public health experts deserve the public's trust as apolitical scientists? Do they have a valid claim of entitlement to discourse-monopoly regarding COVID-related policies? Should we defer in silence to their wisdom?
I'll never forget how public health experts & media fans spent months viciously shaming anyone who left home - to go to a deserted beach or outdoor political rally - only to shift on a dime & announce attending densely packed street protests was not only permissible but mandatory
After humiliating anyone who left home for any reason as a sociopath who wanted to kill Grandma, they instantly invented a new rationale to say that participating in mass protests was not just obligatory politically but *mandated by the public health!*
Noam Chomsky on censorship and the left. Please listen:
Here's the second part of Chomsky's answer.
He's absolutely right: censorship & "cancel culture" have long been weapons used by the establishment against the left, and nobody cared until the left did it.
But he's also right that it's profoundly wrong on principle & strategy.
The Right is good at objecting to censorship when they're the targets. But it's often used against the left as well.
It's easy to defend free speech when it comes to ideas you like. But it only matters if you do it universally, especially for views you hate. It's a principle.
In 2018, when @AOC was running against Joe Crowley, I interviewed her and asked whether she thought Nancy Pelosi (and Steny Hoyer) should continue in their leadership roles or be replaced, and whether she'd agitate for replacements. Here's what she said:
I never criticized her for quickly voting for Pelosi because she had a cogent rationale: the alternative (Tim Ryan or whoever) was worse. The problem is this is her reward for supporting Pelosi is losing a key Committee seat to a rival who opposed Pelosi:
As I told @jimmy_dore last month, I also have more empathy for the dilemmas faced by those who choose to play the "inside" role within a corrupt institution, as a result of my husband @davidmirandario's work in Congress. I daily see the conflicts: they're genuine and hard: