1/ Ezra Vogel’s works have enjoyed wide-ranging and enduring influence. But two of his books were especially helpful to my book on smuggling in China—"One Step Ahead in China” and “Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China.” A thread on the influence of his work on my work.
2/ Smuggling was not his main concern, but Vogel in both books showed how it was a serious problem in the 1980s. Economic reforms stimulated the illicit traffic in watches, TVs, stereos, VCRs, and even cars, depriving the government much-needed revenues and fostering corruption.
3/ So pervasive was coastal smuggling that a 1982 frontpage story of People’s Daily celebrated a Fujian fishing community for *not* joining its neighbors to smuggle. Abstaining from smuggling during this time, in other words, was more newsworthy than engaging in smuggling itself!
4/ As Vogel details in both books, smuggling was also a serious political problem. News of sensational cases circulated widely in China, damaging party prestige and tapping into deep-seated anxieties over the pernicious effects of freewheeling commerce.
5/ Furthermore, smuggling split the government. To reformers, smuggling was an inevitable but ultimately minor problem. To conservatives, it embodied the erosion of party discipline and all that was wrong with the reforms: their pace, scale, and even purpose.
6/ In “Deng Xiaoping,” Vogel describes how conservative discontent reached a boiling point in January 1982. Senior leader Chen Yun, alarmed and incensed at the explosion of economic crimes, summoned officials in charge of reforms in the south back to Beijing for answers.
7/ In his hard-hitting report, “Rampant smuggling activities in parts of Guangdong,” Chen declared: “With regard to serious perpetrators of economic crimes, I want to severely punish a few, imprison a few, and even execute those guilty of the most heinous offenses[.]”
8/ The offenses were so scandalous that that even reformers conceded to their severity. Deng responded by scrawling on the report: 雷厉风行,抓住不放. Or as Vogel translated: "With the power of a thunderbolt and the speed of lightning, grab the issue and don't let go."
9/ Not surprisingly, smuggling became a prime target of virtually all major campaigns in the early reform era, including the Campaign Against Economic Crimes (1982-83), the Anti-Spiritual Pollution Campaign (1983–84), and the Strike Hard Campaign (1983–1984).
10/ Conservative backlash and public crackdowns never fully derailed economic reforms, but concerns over smuggling undoubtedly exacerbated the volatility in policy swings between reform and retrenchment throughout the 1980s.
11/ Smuggling also sparked widespread apprehension and touched on the most critical questions in the post-Mao era. How much and how fast should China open itself? And what can the government do to engage with the global economy while maintaining control over the domestic economy?
12/ The early reform era smuggling crisis and the political rivalries it sparked are detailed in my book, which drew heavily from Vogel's careful research. This is just one example of “standing on the shoulders of giants,” and given Vogel’s extensive work, I know I am not alone!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Philip Thai

Philip Thai Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @philip_thai

8 Jul
1/ The #KoreanWar killed millions of Koreans, created an enduring division, and destroyed a relatively developed economy that survived the ravages of WWII. But the war’s impact reverberated beyond the peninsula. A thread about its global consequences on its 70th anniversary.
2/ The war killed almost 40k Americans. At home, it stirred widespread anti-Communist fears and emboldened Republican critics of the Truman administration. It also led to the adoption of NSC-68, which dramatically expanded the US military and globalized containment strategy.
3/ The war heightened domestic fears in China too. Calling the conflict the “War to Resist America and Aid Korea” 抗美援朝战争, the new Communist government suppressed dissent and consolidated its authority via campaigns like the Three-anti and Five-anti Campaigns 三反五反运动.
Read 12 tweets
4 Jun
1/ Cancellation of 2020 @SHAFRConference was disappointing but necessary. At the encouragement of organizers, panelists are making their abstracts and presentations available online. Here is a (long) thread on my paper "Vice City: Hong Kong in the Anglo-American War on Drugs."
2/ My paper explores the local consequences of a global campaign. HK was ceded to UK in 1842 after the First Opium War and became an entrepôt for Chinese trade. By 1970s it remained a UK colony but transformed itself into a tourism center and a major exporter.
3/ At the same time, HK emerged as a major global narcotics traffic hub. Closure of Turkish pipeline ("the French Connection") left Southeast Asia as new supplier for world market. Opium from the "Golden Triangle" were shipped on Thai trawlers and processed in HK laboratories.
Read 20 tweets
13 Jan
1/ Tariffs have dominated recent news on US-China trade war. But they have always been pivotal to China’s history, shaping modern nationalism and statecraft. A long thread on tariffs in China’s history with lots of images and charts—and the small part US played in that history.
2/ Beginning with the First Opium War (1839-42), the Qing dynasty during the 19th c. lost a series of wars to foreign powers. In the wake of defeat, it signed several “unequal treaties” that accorded many privileges to foreign powers and unfettered access to the China market. Source: MIT Visualizing Cultures
3/ Key features of treaties included opening ports to trade, creating foreign concessions, and granting extraterritoriality—i.e. immunity for foreigners from Chinese laws. These treaties were not fully abrogated until 1943 and have come to symbolize “national humiliation.” Treaty of Nanjing (1842). Source: MIT Visualizing Cultures
Read 21 tweets
10 Jun 19
1/ Final thoughts the Global #ColdWar after teaching it for the first time this semester and fielding student feedback. Some of this might be commonsensical to specialists but are new to me as a legal and economic historian of China.
2/ There are undoubtedly many ways to teach the #ColdWar. Most syllabi on @SHAFRhistorians and elsewhere tend to focus on US foreign relations or US and the world. But more are adopting new perspectives de-centering US-USSR rivalry and elite diplomacy. bit.ly/2K2P4Bd
3/ My own approach was inspired by Arne Westad’s point that the #ColdWar was waged primarily in Third World and far from cold. Unable or unwilling to wage war directly, superpowers and their allies confronted each other indirectly around the globe. bit.ly/2K63uR8
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!