Rant!

I'm seeing a lot of responses to this tweet about too many traders, punters and so on. Will all due respect, these snappy takes are just plain wrong. It takes traders, investors, degenerate gamblers, Warren Buffett ka baap value investors, idiots like me,
god level forensic accounting stock pickers to make a market. The most stupidest narrative to have come of this post pandemic boom in users among brokers & other investing platforms is this asinine "Robinhood traders" narrative, I had written bout it too.
nakedbeta.com/musings-rants/…
The insinuation is that apparently, there's a horde of day traders, selling their houses, pledging their body organs and are gambling their money away. The replies in the tweet are an extension of the absolutely dumb narrative.
The worst part is that this narrative has caught on and has been co-opted by everyone from scammy product pushers to TV anchors. Some advisors have anointed themselves as the saviours of these retail traders, the salvation being an SIP in some overpriced mutual fund.
Coming back to the tweet. Ironically and I don't meant to be insensitive, this pandemic has been the best thing to have happened for financial inclusion. There has been no single event that has caused such a huge surge in first time investors since Indian govt banned porn.
While the glamorous side i.e. a rampaging horde of day traders get all the attention, millions of people have started investing too. This is the best outcome all the advocates of financial inclusion could've hoped for.
Some people still live in a wonderland where trading is taboo, it's like BDSM, while investing is an unblemished virtue. To these people, trading is a sin and would want it not to exist and the markets should only have investors.
I have a suggestion. These people should band together and petition the govt to make day trading a capital offence that is punishable by a hanging first and then a firing squad for the dead body.
What's more, I think they should petition the government to sponsor brain surgeries to cut out the part of the brain that is responsible for greed. This way, there will be no traders because, there's no greed. Also, they shouldn't stop there.
They should ask the gormint to introduce waterboarding to punish people who don't start SIPs. This way we will have 90% financial inclusion in 20 days flat! So simple instead of lamenting over "Robinhood Traders".
Now, to the platform blaming. These new age platforms are one of the best things to have happened to investors and traders in the past decade. They have singlehandedly bought millions of traders who otherwise would've invested in scammy LIC policies, chit funds and emu farms.
And I don't get this tendency to blame platforms for all the people coming and trading and making or losing money. Most traders have never made any money and that has been a universal truism.
What's more, SEBI has done a brilliant job in ensuring that platforms in India don't sell greed. In most of the developed markets CFD platforms, for example, blatantly sell greed. That doesn't happen in India.
And what should the platforms do if someone wants to trade? How can they stop people from losing money? To their credit, a lot of these guys have put up guardrails. They can't handhold everyone.
For better or worse, people only learn by doing stupid shit. There's a reason why most investors would've tried their hand at trading and then become investors. Nothing teaches you about investing like losing money in trading. But some people will always be beyond redemption!
If you go to a gun store, buy a gun and shoot yourself in the bum, is your bum to blame or the gun seller? Although, that would make a thrilling cocktail story. In the absence of these platforms, they would be trading elsewhere or do dabba trading or online gambling.
Although, I wouldn't go so far as to say "once a gambler – always a gambler" I'd say, if there is an intent to gamble there is always an outlet. And moreover, how is all trading gambling or punting? These blanket assertion are wrong.
Now to the saviour complex that trading is bad, investing is good. What people don't realize is that most people don't have enough money to save to begin with. There is a reason why we just have 2 crore unique mutual funds.
This whole notion of, come to the market, buy some long term compounding stocks, buy and die and become Buffett has to be the stupidest pipe dream being sold. Very few people are wired for this and I am not saying you shouldn't figure this this out.
Next, this while notion that financial literacy is a panacea and that people should be taught about finance and money in schools, people have hyped up the benefits of this.
Of course financial literacy is useful but the benefit of it has been overhyped in some ways. Just like research showing it helps, there's research showing financial literacy interventions have negligible impact. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… Image
So this idealistic notion that, people need to be taught about finance, they'll come to the markets, buy compounders and die with those compounders, compound while going potty and never trade and never succumb to greed is just that - a misguided notion!
If you want to say find an advisor, don't even bother. At best we might have some 10,000-15,000 good distributors and maybe 100 RIAs for 2 crore investors!
nakedbeta.com/musings-rants/…
For all this sanctimonious preaching, mis-selling and greed have bought more new investors into the market than all the financial literacy initiatives put together! Let's not kid ourselves.
The easiest way to bring new investors is mis-selling, get them to trade and sell greed, ironically. Financial literacy is what you preach when you know you can't advocate for more mis-selling (by the way, mis-selling is a spectrum, there's good mis-selling too).
Coming back to the original point - traders, gamblers, investors make a market. It's a self correcting system, you make money you stay, if not you get out. The system can only save so many people. It's not possible to get everyone to behave.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ESG compliant gyani

ESG compliant gyani Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @passivefool

26 Dec
Holy shit. 8000 crores raised IN NFOs in a month. Look at the schemes, all pointless garbage!

m.economictimes.com/mf/analysis/eq… Image
If you look closely, 4 out of the 6 top NFOs in terms of money raised are from bank owned NFOs. These AMCs are notoriously skilled at selling garbage funds through their banking channels. They've turned mis-selling into an art. They're are Picasso's of mis-selling
One would be excused for thinking these are intent based allocations by investors which isn't the case. These funds would've been sold mis-sold by any way possible. Bank RMs are incentivized to do so.
Read 10 tweets
25 Dec
Wow, this NFO gravy train isn't stopping

BNP Paribas Mutual Fund has filed to launch BNP Paribas Aqua Fund of Fund. Underlying fund - BNP Paribas Aqua, which invests in companies with a focus on water. Clearly playing off on the hotness of ESG and global

sebi.gov.in/filings/mutual…
The fund has marginally delivered over the benchmark. But the questions is, is it really worth all the hassle? Taking a fund manager risk, theme risk, style risk etc. Sure, you may get paid for it. But it's a hit or a miss. Image
In my it often pays to keep costs low and keep things uncomplicated as possible. One thing investors might not realize is that this trend of AMCs with foreign parentage or affiliations launching FOFs for useless global funds will pickup steam if the US performance continues.
Read 9 tweets
15 Dec
A nobody cares thread.

Nobody cares about the things that matter - getting investors in, helping new distributors advisors, making things (Slightly) easier for investors, honest mis-selling etc.
Nobody cares about direct plans of mutual funds
Nobody cares about about mutual funds either

Very few care about mutual funds. Just 2.1 crore unique investors. If you probably take out HNIs/institutions in this, that's maybe 20-30%, what's left are the common gareeb folks.
Read 9 tweets
30 Nov
HDFC makes over Rs 400 crores in fees (direct plan) from just two of Prashant Jain's schemes. And then add another Rs 300 crores odd as commissions in regular plans.

All this for underperforming Nifty 50 by 4-5% in the last 5 years.
Being a large AMC is a license to print money. After a while stories and fund manager cults dwarf brute numbers and facts.
85% of industry AUM is in regular plans. By my guesstimate, over half of the AUM is not getting the right advice or worse yet is being scammed into useless costly funds.
Read 21 tweets
9 Oct
On second thought, making young people feel guilty about not saving or starting investing can be harmful. When young people are starting their careers, odds are they won't be making much, they should be spending what they can in experiences rather than invest or save.
I used to feel guilty about not starting investing early but on second thought, I probably couldn't have because I wasn't making enough. A good chunk of the financial services industry is based on making people feel like shit for not investing in their mostly scammy high fee
products. I think this has played a big part in deterring investors - the anxiety caused by the money shamers, the guilt of not knowing how to invest, the intimidation and the ensuing guilt as a result of 1000s of funds, platforms, guides, books, gyan, gurus and shit.
Read 10 tweets
16 Sep
Today in re-learning. Most of active fund returns can be explained by factor exposures - Value, Quality, Momentum, Low-Volatility etc.

msci.com/documents/1019…
You can assemble these funds for less than 50-60bps. You can replace all those costly, mostly useless discretionary active funds which most likely are doing what a smart beta ETF (UGG, disgusting term) does and charging on an average 1.2%-1.5%.
Anybody who predicts things is either lying or making a fool oh himself. So I'll make a fool of myself. Globally smart beta ETFs have become replacements for traditional active funds. I predict that this trend will only pick up pace over time.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!