Wow, this NFO gravy train isn't stopping

BNP Paribas Mutual Fund has filed to launch BNP Paribas Aqua Fund of Fund. Underlying fund - BNP Paribas Aqua, which invests in companies with a focus on water. Clearly playing off on the hotness of ESG and global

sebi.gov.in/filings/mutual…
The fund has marginally delivered over the benchmark. But the questions is, is it really worth all the hassle? Taking a fund manager risk, theme risk, style risk etc. Sure, you may get paid for it. But it's a hit or a miss.
In my it often pays to keep costs low and keep things uncomplicated as possible. One thing investors might not realize is that this trend of AMCs with foreign parentage or affiliations launching FOFs for useless global funds will pickup steam if the US performance continues.
Pointless costly diversification with sub-par funds, might not really be worth it when you have really good low-cost alternatives now. With these useless funds, you end up losing most of the juice in costs.
Take the example of the biggest US fund in India - Franklin India Feeder - Franklin U.S. Opportunities Fund. Here's how it has performed vs Nasdaq 100 ETF (N100). You can attribute it to whatever reason but it's useless.
It's very important not to let the recent US performance lead you astray. Great past performance most often than not means poor future returns. And in the case of poor performance, costs will just make it even worse.
I'm not saying all of the these global FOFs are bad, some might be good, but I'm a sceptic. This has nothing to with my preference for index funds as much as the misaligned inceptives to sell costly funds here.
If you look closely at the underlying global schemes of these FOFs, these tend to be orphan schemes that are shunned in that particular domestic market. Most often than not, it's just global garbage in new shiny domestic wrappers.
Look closely and know what you are getting. Costs will kill you. Don't over extrapolate the recent good performance of global themes and jump in.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with #ESG compliant verbal farts

#ESG compliant verbal farts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @passivefool

26 Dec
Holy shit. 8000 crores raised IN NFOs in a month. Look at the schemes, all pointless garbage!

m.economictimes.com/mf/analysis/eq… Image
If you look closely, 4 out of the 6 top NFOs in terms of money raised are from bank owned NFOs. These AMCs are notoriously skilled at selling garbage funds through their banking channels. They've turned mis-selling into an art. They're are Picasso's of mis-selling
One would be excused for thinking these are intent based allocations by investors which isn't the case. These funds would've been sold mis-sold by any way possible. Bank RMs are incentivized to do so.
Read 10 tweets
23 Dec
Rant!

I'm seeing a lot of responses to this tweet about too many traders, punters and so on. Will all due respect, these snappy takes are just plain wrong. It takes traders, investors, degenerate gamblers, Warren Buffett ka baap value investors, idiots like me,
god level forensic accounting stock pickers to make a market. The most stupidest narrative to have come of this post pandemic boom in users among brokers & other investing platforms is this asinine "Robinhood traders" narrative, I had written bout it too.
nakedbeta.com/musings-rants/…
The insinuation is that apparently, there's a horde of day traders, selling their houses, pledging their body organs and are gambling their money away. The replies in the tweet are an extension of the absolutely dumb narrative.
Read 26 tweets
15 Dec
A nobody cares thread.

Nobody cares about the things that matter - getting investors in, helping new distributors advisors, making things (Slightly) easier for investors, honest mis-selling etc.
Nobody cares about direct plans of mutual funds
Nobody cares about about mutual funds either

Very few care about mutual funds. Just 2.1 crore unique investors. If you probably take out HNIs/institutions in this, that's maybe 20-30%, what's left are the common gareeb folks.
Read 9 tweets
30 Nov
HDFC makes over Rs 400 crores in fees (direct plan) from just two of Prashant Jain's schemes. And then add another Rs 300 crores odd as commissions in regular plans.

All this for underperforming Nifty 50 by 4-5% in the last 5 years.
Being a large AMC is a license to print money. After a while stories and fund manager cults dwarf brute numbers and facts.
85% of industry AUM is in regular plans. By my guesstimate, over half of the AUM is not getting the right advice or worse yet is being scammed into useless costly funds.
Read 21 tweets
9 Oct
On second thought, making young people feel guilty about not saving or starting investing can be harmful. When young people are starting their careers, odds are they won't be making much, they should be spending what they can in experiences rather than invest or save.
I used to feel guilty about not starting investing early but on second thought, I probably couldn't have because I wasn't making enough. A good chunk of the financial services industry is based on making people feel like shit for not investing in their mostly scammy high fee
products. I think this has played a big part in deterring investors - the anxiety caused by the money shamers, the guilt of not knowing how to invest, the intimidation and the ensuing guilt as a result of 1000s of funds, platforms, guides, books, gyan, gurus and shit.
Read 10 tweets
16 Sep
Today in re-learning. Most of active fund returns can be explained by factor exposures - Value, Quality, Momentum, Low-Volatility etc.

msci.com/documents/1019…
You can assemble these funds for less than 50-60bps. You can replace all those costly, mostly useless discretionary active funds which most likely are doing what a smart beta ETF (UGG, disgusting term) does and charging on an average 1.2%-1.5%.
Anybody who predicts things is either lying or making a fool oh himself. So I'll make a fool of myself. Globally smart beta ETFs have become replacements for traditional active funds. I predict that this trend will only pick up pace over time.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!