While it's true that the coronavirus relief bill doesn't have anything designated as state and local aid, there's actually about $127 billion in there that can shore up state budgets -- which, remember, were down only $37 billion total through the end of September. 1/
The $82B in additional education grants and $45B for transportation projects has to be spent on education and transportation, but it's not contingent on states maintaining their own spending levels. They can use that federal infusion to redirect their own revenues. 2/
This is the primary way the federal government provided aid to state governments during the Great Recession -- by upping its contribution to Medicaid, education, and transportation, freeing up state dollars for other uses (including backfilling budgets). 3/
The Family First bill upped FMAP, giving states about $50 billion to work with.
The CARES Act offered about $56 billion in fungible education and transit aid, and Treasury guidance on CRF money (the $150B) lets much of it go to existing expenses as well. 4/
It's hard to get a handle on exactly how much of the $150 billion actually went to existing expenses (things like the salaries of public safety and public health officials), but if the new relief bill passes, flexible aid is easily over $250 billion, and probably much more. 5/
During the Great Recession, the total amount of flexible aid was $144 billion.
And this is without even considering all the other ways the federal government has propped up state budgets, like enhanced UI (taxable income) and PPP (props up employer and employee taxes). 6/
With state tax collections down $37.4 billion Jan-Sept, this is actually a fair bit of flexible aid. Yes, the final budgetary losses for states will be worse than $37B, with another hit coming in April, but $250B+ is sizable considering current losses.
Here's a more detailed summary of the above, which uses a slightly lower number ($106 billion) because some of the transportation money is designated for things that wouldn't be as fungible. taxfoundation.org/relief-bill-co…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
- Biden outlines essentially a natural law viewpoint, with courts to uphold God-given rights prior to and above written law
- He seems to situate abortion within these God-given rights
- But he believes abortion is against God's will
Here he spells out something that looks pretty similar to a natural law philosophy. He just says "natural rights" but emphasizes that they're God-given and believes them prior to and above human law, but enforceable by human courts:
Biden seems to situate abortion within this natural rights / natural law framework:
If people who throw axes while under the influence of alcohol are going "nah, too dangerous for me," your reopening is going to take a while. bisnow.com/atlanta/news/r…
When and how to lift business restrictions is a really complicated issue, and I don't have the answer. Georgia's doing it faster than seems advisable to me, but lots of other states are starting phased re-openings. A few notes:
1. Even if you think that reopening now is an atrocious idea, don't assume those who disagree are doing it out of indifference to human suffering. There's an awful lot of suffering due to closures too. Balancing that is tough. People can get it wrong without being evil.
Today we launched a visual guide to unemployment benefit claims, which we will be updating weekly with each Thursday's data release. The numbers are sobering. A few notes on understanding these figures: 1/ taxfoundation.org/unemployment-i…
Timing matters a lot. It will take at least another 1-2 weeks to have a strong sense of which states are facing the worst crisis. Right now there are challenges in disentangling timing of closure orders, pace of processing UI claims, reporting lags, from larger considerations. 2/
So, for instance, we know that some states initially couldn't keep pace with the benefit claims coming in. A comparatively modest (nothing is low) increase in those states is hardly good news. 3/
The Senate is taking up the Treasury rule disallowing SALT deduction cap workarounds today. Overriding a regulation under the CRA is rare but not unprecedented, particularly recently. The resolution is privileged, meaning that it's expedited and gets a guaranteed floor vote. 1/
Suspending a regulation under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) requires a simple majority vote in both chambers and a presidential signature. At least one Democrat, Sen. Bennet (CO), is opposed to overturning the rule, which would almost exclusively benefit high earners. 2/
However, it's unclear whether all Senate Republicans support it. Some have expressed concern about the rule's effect on charitable organizations, though business contributions are not affected (no SALT cap there, treated as taxes paid). 3/