Kevin Rudd Profile picture
23 Dec, 19 tweets, 6 min read
The Morrison Government pretends that it cares about the mismanagement of public money, but everywhere you turn you see them splurging on waste and pet projects while cutting services for those in need. Let me share one recent personal experience.
15 months ago, in Sept 2019, I wrote to the Morrison Govt to ask about the new Foreign Influence Transparency Register, which is designed to catch foreign agents trying to influence our politics. It affects everyone, but the rules are tighter for former ministers, as they should.
I have been a supporter of this Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme (FITS) legislation from the beginning, because it's important to keep tabs on actual agents of foreign government influence who are trying to affect Australian politics. It's a good and worthy objective.
I had already checked with my lawyer, who said I didn't have to register because I don't do anything "on behalf of" a foreign power. Pretty straightforward. But, not wanting to go to prison by accident, I thought why not double-check with the government?
My day job is at an American think tank, @AsiaPolicy, and I have roles with universities and other non-government organisations in the US, Canada, the UK & elsewhere. But I do not receive any payments coming from foreign governments & I am in no way an agent of foreign influence.
We wrote to them in Sept 2019. After many follow-up letters, the Govt finally got back to me a few weeks ago and basically said: "You need to register some of your activities, but we don't want to tell you which ones; and if you register the wrong ones, you might be prosecuted."
Since then, I've been trying to work out which of my interactions with foreigners need to be registered with the Morrison Govt, and which don't — and it's clear as mud. In my various roles, I've probably been in meetings with people from 30+ different countries in the last month.
The Morrison Government's definition of a foreign "arrangement" is so broad, they reckon I may be at risk of becoming a secret agent of British influence in Australia just by appearing live on @BBC. Even if Australia doesn't come up. Or even if I criticise the UK Govt on-air.
By the way, this Government said the law would be applied with "common sense" after @HonTonyAbbott kicked up a stink & refused to register his speech to an international conservative political conference last year. The reality is that little common sense is being applied at all.
I've therefore decided that, instead of doing an Abbott by ignoring the government, I am just going to register every contact with foreign countries on a rolling basis, at least until this Government stops wasting its time and your money. theguardian.com/australia-news…
I informed the Attorney-General's Department of this decision yesterday, and you'll eventually be able to see my registration here: ag.gov.au/integrity/fore… I'll keep updating it as needed.
Wait till the Murdoch mafia find out I'm a Snr Fellow at University of Toronto, Canada, and Chatham House, London; or that I haven't finished my PhD in the UK; or that I interviewed the Chinese Foreign Minister at an @AsiaSociety event. Hold the front page for that one, Rupert.
Quite apart from the lack of clarity around what the obligations are for all former Cabinet ministers, my experience of the way this legislation is being interpreted has raised a real problem for media freedom.
I've spoken with Bret Walker SC, one of the country's top legal minds, and he advises me that media organisations aren't exempt from the new law. So they too, it seems, need to register their arrangements with foreign governments.
Bret Walker SC highlighted to me the example of Murdoch's @SharriMarkson being leaked an "explosive dossier" (probably by the Trump Administration) to influence the Australian public. Similar tactics were used to soften Australians up to invade Iraq.
I'm not saying @SharriMarkson should have to register as a potential agent of foreign influence, but that seems to be what the Gov's broad interpretation means. I've written to the AG's Dept urging them to work through this perhaps unintended consequence w/ @withmeaa & publishers
I'd personally argue that billionaire Rupert Murdoch, as a US citizen, is Australia's most powerful foreign influencer. Politicians all over the world, including Morrison, know Murdoch offers them a protection racket if they do his company favours. Is that "foreign influence"?
There are fmr ministers who should rightly register their foreign influence. Robb worked for the Chinese company that leased Port of Darwin. Abbott is now a UK trade negotiator. Hockey keeps contact with the Trump Admin and reflects these views in our media. All important to know
But the wide interpretation by the AG's Department implies that any arrangement by a former cabinet minister must be registered or face possibility of prosecution. So we'll keep burning taxpayer dollars to find out who's having tea with Howard, and when Turnbull goes on the BBC.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Rudd

Kevin Rudd Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MrKRudd

4 Dec
We see #MurdochsPetitionPanic becoming even more frantic. They appear to be settling on a strategy — personally smear anyone who supports a Royal Commission, rather than face reality of Murdoch’s toxic brand after a decade of abusing monopoly power. Anything to avoid scrutiny. Image
Something new to #MurdochsPetitionPanic is the broadening of the campaign by co-opting other media. Audio from Thursday’s festival of whinging Murdoch editors was leaked to Fairfax as a warning to others they too will be smeared for publicly backing a #MurdochRoyalCommission. Image
These kinds of character assassinations are a huge part of Murdoch’s strategy for seeing off threats to his business interests. How many people have been smeared on the front pages for daring to question the validity of Murdoch’s monopoly? Murdoch rules by a climate of fear.
Read 6 tweets
3 Dec
Is anybody else getting a whiff of #MurdochsPetitionPanic? A special meeting of Murdoch editors to spell out their strategy to avoid answering for their conduct before a Royal Commission. smh.com.au/business/compa…
Straight from the Murdoch playbook: they know they can’t win the argument, so they frame it around a couple of individuals and try to demolish them personally. But this isn’t about me or Turnbull — it’s about Australians demanding fairness, accuracy and diversity in their news.
If Murdoch’s editors have nothing to be ashamed of, why are they so afraid of a Royal Commission? Honestly, you’d think we were asking for their firstborn children the way they are so frantically overreacting. #MurdochsPetitionPanic #MurdochRoyalCommission
Read 4 tweets
28 Nov
Morrison's Govt awash in corruption, but what does Murdoch put on page 1? Surprise, surprise. Another character assassination attempt based on selective, twisted accounts of me seeking fairer coverage for Labor 15yrs ago. Anything to avoid the substance of #MurdochRoyalCommission
The Murdoch media were bad in 2007, but after 2010 they became an extreme far-right operation. Ask the many professional journos who’ve since quit News Corp. Ask Rupert's son, James, who spectacularly resigned over the "hidden agendas", "disinformation" and climate change denial.
As I've already stated publicly, I make no apology for seeing Murdoch and his editors to lessen their anti-Labor bias in 2007. I can only assume we'll get his other editors to do their own "tell all" stories of meetings with me. Do your worst, Rupert.
Read 8 tweets
29 Oct
As Chair of the IPI Board for the last two years, the Board is unanimous that all questions about the IPI's integrity should be asked and thoroughly answered. These matters are serious and they deserve scrutiny. My full statement to the media is here: kevinrudd.com/wp-content/upl…
I've now done six broadcast interviews today about events at IPI and the recommendations I'm taking to the Board to obtain answers to the remaining questions about the institution’s fundraising. These build on the steps the Board has taken over the last year.
As for Murdoch's page-one "exclusive", it wasn't exclusive at all. The donations in question were reported last year. IPI also posted to its official website making public the Board's commitment to donate an equal sum to support victims of sexual violence: ipinst.org/wp-content/upl…
Read 6 tweets
15 Sep
So I see we’re having a debate about future economic directions… Here are a few points for #ScottyFromMarketing to reflect on… Thread
Early this year Cormann, Morrison’s Finance Minister, attacked our govt's stimulus package in the GFC, stating "We will not be pursuing a cash splash in the reckless Rudd-Gillard fashion, no,". Now they’ve adopted this same "reckless" strategy.
Remember our govt’s debt during the GFC was supposed to be "unsustainable", but under Morrison, it's five times the size of ours. #MorrisonsGiantDebtCon
Read 6 tweets
28 Aug
A case study of the Murdoch method: How lies are used to manipulate the truth. Remember this racist, sexist cartoon from the @australian that derided US Vice-Presidential candidate @KamalaHarris as a "little brown girl"? THREAD
Amid global outrage at this cartoon, Murdoch editor Chris (I'm not a racist) Dore demanded his staff step up to defend his appalling decision to publish it. So who stepped up? None other than Murdoch "journalist" Chris (veteran Liberal Party staffer) Kenny! 2/8
The central premise of Kenny's argument is simply untrue. He says Joe Biden "openly and proudly imposed criteria that his vice-presidential running mate would be a woman of colour" and selected Harris on "publicly stated race and gender criteria". Lies. 3/8
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!