Wherever you stood on the wiseness of the Iraq war, committing war crimes in it, in this case massacring 17 unarmed civilians, is not some kind of #bothsides issue.
Whether from a human rights perspective or just a cold desire to win the war, it was inarguably wrong + stupid
It is inarguable that US military repeatedly was angered by how contractor force and Blackwater in particular was undermining its COIN efforts brookings.edu/research/cant-…
And let's be clear, it went well beyond Nissor Square massacre, ranging from how Blackwater ill-planning+cutting corners led to Fallujah to a drunken Blackwater shooting dead the security guard of the Iraqi Vice President on Christmas Eve, 2006.
If you need a trip back memory lane on this issue, or want to learn more, I'd urge you to read this report. It was my final, frustrated effort at summing up what I had seen and learned on the topic after over a decade of working on it: brookings.edu/wp-content/upl…
(It also included this personal gem about what happens when you try to work honestly on the private military topic in particular).
So let's not, yet again, #bothsides Trump rewarding those who did clear wrong, while harming our national security and the military in particular.
It is lazy narrative,
factually incorrect,
a disservice to anyone who worked this topic,
and, most of all, insulting to the dead
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How Should The U.S. Should Respond To Russia's Massive Computer Hack? npr.org/2020/12/22/949…
My Answer to @MorningEdition@NPR :
Think like Mike Tyson And Muhammed Ali
Build back deterrence thru BOTH retaliation and resilience (rope a dope)
The long answer (not broadcast):
Deterrence is not just about you, but them. It is about changing adversary's calculations. Unfortunately, right now Russia's calculations seems to be that it works and, even worse, that they can get away with it, whatever 'it' is.
The key to building back deterrence is to understand that adversaries are deterred either through retaliation, where you don't hit me because I'll hit back, and/or through resilience, where you don't hit me because it just won't work.
In at least 3 ways: 1) Current+looming debt ($421M loans due) = foreign powers influence, clearly already flexed by Turkey 2) Finances and tax cheats that would normally yank security clearances (IE Javanka) 3) But my big worry: Now we see a new "why" for disrupting election...
"Facebook says it is ready for violent unrest in the US election, and has plans to restrict the spread of inflammatory posts" businessinsider.com/facebook-prepa…
Judiciary-check
professional civil service -check
transfer of power at national level-check
use of state power to target opponents -check
mix of political/personal/business interests -check
Blatant nepotism, but accepted due to son in law's power -check
Use of state/extra state power to reward/punish media, at both individual reporter and business level -check
Use of state power to reward/punish corporate loyalty -check
"Three Ways to Clean Up the Toxic Minefields of Social Media"
I teamed up with a Human Rights leader and a Silicon Valley executive on 3 approaches, each doable, to make the battle harder for those who push disinfo+hate speech+engineered trends defenseone.com/ideas/2020/09/… #likewar
The 3 principles to guide:
1) “If you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.”
--need for tracking and reporting
2) Informed customers are protected customers.
--flagging automated and other inauthentic info
3) Empowered customers are protected customers.
--filter options
Different from a lot out there, we don't claim a false "fix" that would solve everything, but would never be possible to be implemented for legal or political or profit reasons.
Rather, they are doable steps that would throw some Clausewitzian "friction" at the bad guys.