"Do not use dishonest standards when measuring length, weight, or quantity. Use honest scales and honest weights, an honest ephah, and an honest hin. I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt." Leviticus 19:35-36
Calvin argues that dishonest weights and scales "involve the grossest violation of public justice" (social justice). Not only that, but he argues that "...if the laws of buying and selling are corrupted, human society is in a manner dissolved" because of its systemic impact.
God condemns such "trickeries... by which our neighbors are defrauded" and that "He sets Himself against all evil and illicit arts of gain."
People who read the Bible generations ago had no problem talking about "public justice"/"social justice" and systemic sin.
White Evangelicals who push back hard against the ideas of public justice and systemic sin have to realize that they are actually a minority position within the history of the church, if not an entire anomaly in terms of the trajectory of biblical exegesis as a whole.
In other words, the main reason why they bristle at the idea of public justice and systemic sin is informed more by their socio-cultural setting as White, American, politically conservative Evangelicals than careful exegesis that recognizes the history of biblical interpretation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
No need to debate if Jesus was a refugee. Sing about it instead.
Lonely travelers from the stable
Out beneath the hard blue sky
Journeying, wandering, hoping, praying
For the safety of their child
While our mother Rachel’s weeping
Fills the streets of Bethlehem.
Kyrie eleison
Warned by angels moved to save him
Who was born our kind to save
Joseph leads his holy family
Far from Herod and harm’s way
Mary shielding and consoling
Jesus Christ the Son of God.
Kyrie eleison.
Fleeing from the land of promise
They in Egypt find a home
Strange the workings of God’s mercy
House of bondage now God’s throne
But for sons who all were murdered
Sorrow breaks the House of Bread.
Kyrie eleison.
In his commentary on Daniel 9:6, Calvin specifically touches on systemic sin - the idea that sin can be embedded within the systems, institutions, and patterns that have been set by predecessors. The idea of systemic sin is entirely consonant with Calvin's understanding of
individual guilt.
"...others shelter themselves in the crowd of offenders. 'What could I do? I am but a man; I have only followed the example of the many.' ...Here, then, [Daniel] implicates kings, princes, and fathers in the same guilt; as if he had said, all are to be
condemned without exception before God. This again must be diligently noticed. For we see how the common people think everything permitted to them which is approved by their kings and counselors... Respecting the "fathers," we see how frivolous is the excuse of those who use
The gospel solution to oppression is not vengeance upon the oppressors. It is the liberation of both the oppressed and oppressors from the cycle of oppression.
Gustavo Gutierrez recognized this important point in the story of Jonah. It was not only that Jonah had racial/ethnic hatred of Ninevites, but it was also the fact that he preferred vengeance upon the oppressors of his people rather than liberation (read his "God of Life").
This is seen in the story of Zaccheus, who brings reparation as an outflow of saving grace to make right those he oppressed and defrauded. Jesus goes to his house, of all places, to free him from being an oppressor.
Peggy McIntosh's important work "White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack" defines white
privilege as an "invisible package of unearned assets that I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was 'meant' to remain oblivious. White privilege is like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools ,
and blank checks." She's clear that white privilege is not white guilt - the idea that White people should collectively feel responsible and guilty for the racism White people have committed in the past.
McIntosh specifically lists 50 instances of white privilege that people of
Christians are debating over whether policy or character is the determinative factor for choosing who to vote for as President. The problem is that many are talking as if Trump's policies somehow make up for or are worth voting for despite his character flaws. But they don't.
They are perfectly in line with his character flaws, not some sort of saving grace.
The claims that his administration has purportedly "saved" the American trifecta of religious liberty, the pro-life movement, and capitalism - are dubious and misleading and also make one
question exactly how "Christian" certain policies even are in the first place.
His purported pro-religious liberty policies have coincided with a multifold growth of both Christian nationalism and jaded ex-vangelicals. His purported pro-life policies have resulted in the