1/ Been following $BABA comments on FinTwit, not an expert but some observations and thoughts:

(1) Lots of ppl selling seemed to have bought the stock speculatively; assuming it'll go up and to the right
(2) China experts I've spoken to think the 13% drop is a major overreaction
(3) IMO if your primary source of info is the WSJ that's probably a red flag. Owning $BABA probably requires either first hand research and a network of experts. If not, then your going to be out arbitraged based on information flow alone (let alone the follow on analysis)
(4) In general, ppl have a hard time pricing political / regulatory risk. Ie. I'd approach it as a 20% chance of a 30% decrease in future cash flows = 6% discount to current price. Unable to calculate the risk, ppl bifurcate it as 0% or 100%. The latter sold their shares
(5) Hopefully if you're buying or holding $BABA the China / CCP risk is baked into your target price. And, you have solid thesis on why market expectations are misaligned. For me personally, the news over the past few weeks hasn't isn't surprising and will be doubling up :)
(6) My current predictions is that CCP will slap several minor fines on to $BABA and a lot of their anti competitive tactics will be banned. There will be no expropriation or divestures. $BABA will continue to be a start-sponsored champion and be in bed with the CCP
PS. I generally think ppl generally overestimate risk in China and underestimate it in other markets (driven by the media). Below is an example of the risks for $SE but I'm not sure if most investors have spent a ton of time pricing this

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Annanth Aravinthan

Annanth Aravinthan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProtagorasTO

25 Dec
1/ So I use to run a competitive intel team and spent a god awful amount of time sourcing data.

If you aren't familiar with Second Measure they effectively aggregate online sales data (ie credit cards) which they then sell to co's as market share data

bloomberg.com/company/press/…
2/ In the old offline world, retailers such as Walmart, Target, etc. would sell their sales data to someone like Nielsen. Nielsen packages this up with consulting services and resells it back to manufacturers (ie P&G, Colgate, etc.) or other co's such as investment firms
3/ This structure has not replicated itself in the online world. Amazon, DoorDash, Netflix, etc. aren't sharing their data with anyone.
Read 8 tweets
5 Dec
1/ $DASH about to IPO for around $30B. On top of the profitability question, there's another one about the durability of that profitability (moats). Having launched 2 and 3 sided mktplces for Eats, I can tell you the latter was exponentially harder to build *and* manage.
2/ In food delivery, a 2 sided mktplace is a traditional aggregator. A sales team adds restos to the platform and marketing acquires users. Restos complete their own delivery, so the aggregator gets to skip all the messy parts and friction in the physical world.
3/ 2 sided food delivery different from ride hailing where it's viewed as an incremental earnings. If restos don't get any orders, that's OK because they're running their dine-in biz. This takes pressure off the aggregator, especially as they launch new markets and demand lags.
Read 10 tweets
27 Nov
1/ Finally bought some Sea ($SE) after months of due diligence. Current price is $177, here is my expected value:

Bear - $49 * 15%
Base - $140 * 60%
Bull - $377 * 25%

Price Target = $185

For a great summary checkout @juliey4’s substack. Instead, below is a thread on risks 👇
1/ Still Building its Moat - right now SEA’s entire strategic focus is on creating their flywheel which Free Fire (FF) is at the heart of. It generates the CF that is reinvested into Shopee and SeaMoney to drive growth and build their moats (free deliveries, R&D, etc.).
2/ Gaming Inconsistency - specific titles tend to ebb and flow as hits eventually lose their appeal to new games. Pre-covid, rev growth was expected to slow to <12%. Can Garena sustain FF’s growth, consistently create new hits, and renew it’s exclusive Tencent contract in 2023?
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!