Thought provoking article by Andrew Sullivan: "I miss lesbians. It is true that most homosexual men don’t have too many integrated in our lives, but most of us have a few. And we need them. 1/5 spectator.co.uk/article/the-jo…
They check our sometimes tenuous grasp of reality, they roll their eyes at our hedonism, they show us how marriages can last, and take care of us when we get sick. I miss lesbians these days because so many are now becoming men. Many of the sudden hordes of youngsters... 2/5
seeking a testosteroned transition to maleness today would once have been teen lesbians — happy to expand the realm of femaleness to the most tomboyish of tomboys. But now, under the influence of queer theory & peer pressure, the tomboy is being told that whatever obstacles..3/5
she may encounter, they can be resolved through male hormones. That subversive, uniquely dykey, all-female space is narrowing. The social justice revolution has space for countless consonants, dozens of pronouns, but not so much leeway for women who love women and not men. 4/5
It’s too binary for a deconstructed non-binary world. In the 1980s, there were around 200 lesbian bars in the US. Now there are 15. As my friend the lesbian writer Katie Herzog puts it: ‘Great. We’ll each get our own.’ #Lesbians 5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Well it's funny but not funny really is it @sally_hines? To any adult who does not question why there has been a 4400% rise in UK girls wishing to become boys via puberty blockers, CSH & surgery over the last decade, we ask you to pause, do some research and think.
On a scale of 1 to 10 how funny is it for children to start a lifetime of medication? How funny is it that other comorbidities such as autism, anxiety, depression are not thoroughly explored? How funny is it that girls as young as 12 in US & 18 in UK have healthy breasts removed?
How much does it make you laugh to imagine a child agreeing with her clinician that she never ever wants to have children? And how funny is it that she knows now, as a child, that she is the opposite sex, because peer pressure & social media tell her so?
Why is the Scottish government's proposed Hate Crime Bill such a threat to free speech? @ALLIANCELGB has written directly to every MSP in advance of today's Stage 1 debate in Holyrood to highlight our two main concerns. /1
First, we believe the new offence of ‘stirring up hatred' is defined so vaguely it's open to wide misinterpretation and potential abuse. Every attempt by the Justice Secretary to clarify or amend it has added to the confusion. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla… /2
Each time concerns have been raised, he has fiercely defended his Bill, only to be forced to amend it. This contributes to a sense the whole exercise was badly thought through from the start. But he hasn't solved the biggest problem of all. eveningexpress.co.uk/news/scotland/… /3
We welcome new rule changes for gay and bisexual men donating blood. Risk management should always be based on science and hard facts, not on someone's sexual orientation. This is a big victory for commonsense, and careful, rational lobbying. bbc.co.uk/news/health-55… /1of4
The changes are a result of the work of FAIR (For the Assessment of Individual Risk) Steering Group, with representatives from the four UK blood services, as well as the National Aids Trust and @THTorguk The result: all men will be treated equally whatever their orientation./2of5
It's with regret we note the changes won't become effective until summer 2021. However, when they do all donors who've had new or multiple partners in the last 3 months will be asked if they've had anal sex, and if so will have to wait a further 3 months to donate./3of5
We are so grateful to all our donors for your continuing loyal support. We will carry on standing up for people with same-sex sexual orientation and showing how regressive gender identity theory is harming children and young people. Here are a few of the messages we’ve received.
We salute the MPs who support the Equality Act Review Campaign: all are champions of human rights, determined to make society a better place for the vulnerable. They want to improve the protections in the Equality Act based on an expanded range of factors:/1of8
These factors include homelessness,low socio-economic status and/or poverty, caste, & immigration status.We believe these are wholly well-intentioned proposals that deserve serious consideration. There is a problem, however. Among these ideas is one of a very different kind:/2of8
the campaign proposes “joining ‘sex’ and ‘gender reassignment’ to be one protected characteristic using gender neutral language.” “What’s wrong with that?” you ask. Isn’t gender-neutral language fairer? What would the “gender-neutral” term be? Gender identity?/3of8