AG Profile picture
27 Dec, 15 tweets, 3 min read
Ok I guess I will have to go over the history here since people are trying to rewrite it. There are 2 separate topics: The omnibus spending + the relief bill. Let's start with the relief bill.

Congress has been fighting over how to do a secondary relief bill since May...
At one point Trump (to his credit) used FEMA funds to add UI benefits. When October came around it became obvious that Pelosi had an intentional strategy of not passing anything until after the election, McConnell wanted to pass a compromise based on what everyone agreed to.
However, Trump was desperate to get a deal bc he thought it would help him for the election so he kept upping the offer w/o Republican buy-in (up to 1.8 trillion at one point). Pelosi had no interest bc she saw it as a way to help Dems during election (I went after her for it).
Trump got so frustrated that he suddenly (and foolishly) declared a pause to negotiations until after the election. He got a lot of backlash from it (inc from me) because suddenly he took responsibility for something Pelosi was doing.
The next day after the backlash, he tweeted a bunch of random (& bad) proposals such as to just send him a bill with the $1200 checks (which are the worst aspect of the relief). That is the tweet a lot of Trump defenders are pointing to. No one took those seriously.
After the election, Pelosi changed her tune and was suddenly willing to pass a compromise bill (~900B). Negotiators, including from the WH, got back at it and secured an agreement based only on items everyone agreed to (R's & D's dropped certain demands from the bill).
That was right on time because a lot of Americans were losing all their unemployment benefits (this week), the eviction moratorium was ending, small businesses needed $ to maintain payrolls. Pelosi caused the crunch, but it was real now.
Now separately from that, Congress has to authorize all the spending that the federal government does each year. The executive department submit their requests, Trump's team puts them in their budget, and then Congress mostly adopts them or try to negotiate some of them.
That funding was needed right after the election or the government would shutdown since we've mostly been running via CRs. No one really focused on that since no one was objecting to the contents for the most part. Mostly the fight is over how long to authorize the budget for.
The problem is that was also under a time crunch as soon as the election was over. Time had run out. Especially in the Senate it takes awhile to bring a bill to the floor and pass it and now they had 2 major topics that required immediate attention.
They didn't see it as an issue since WH negotiators were involved, no one was objecting to anything in either bill, and time was short. So in the House they voted on them separately, in Senate they passed them together w/ promise from WH negotiators Trump would sign.
& everyone knows Trump would have signed, but for one thing: he was mad at McConnell and other Senate R's for not backing his election shenanigans. He saw this as an opportunity to leverage the omnibus/relief bill to get support on that. So he's holding relief hostage.
It has nothing to do with the foreign aid or pork (which were in his own budget and he never objected to) or the amount in payments (which his own negotiators agreed-to & he can ask for more after). Those are just pretexts. So here we are now.
The last point is there are only 2 outcomes here now: 1) Trump signs the bill 2) Trump doesn't, no relief for Americans for 2 months, and then Biden and new Congress pass the same funding + a relief bill that will likely be much worse (inc state bailouts etc).
And now we’ve gone with option 1. Crisis is over. Americans get relief for the immediate future, which is what matters. Everything else is spin.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AG

AG Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AGHamilton29

23 Dec
Let me simplify. There are 2 possible paths now:

1) Trump signs the bill

2) Trump does nothing. D's bring up a unanimous consent vote on 2k checks (w/ 0 funding cuts) and R's reject. Gov't shuts down or short-term CR. No relief bill and negotiations start from scratch in Jan.
And with Biden as POTUS and 48-50 Senate seats, whole negotiation changes in Jan. Nothing will be taken out of the spending bill but guaranteed $ for states and other Dem goodies are back on the table and it will be a 2 trillion bill.
Oh and I forgot to mention: Since unemployment runs out on Dec 23rd for many, eviction moratorium on Dec 31st, and no PPP loans = job cuts, a lot of Americans will suffer as a result until they pass a much worse bill in February.
Read 4 tweets
23 Dec
Thread . Other problem is that the legislative session is running out so real threat of a pocket veto. So only realistic options are Trump signs the bill or Americans who desperately need relief have to wait until they start from scratched with Biden as President.
And btw with Biden as POTUS and possibly winning GA, the whole negotiation changes. If you don't like the stuff that's in the omnibus now, wait until you see what Dems throw in the relief bill when they have the WH and possibly the Senate.
People on here really don't understand the mess that Trump threatened to create last night because they think you can just magically pass a new bill in a day, but that's just not how it works. Dems know there will never be unanimous consent for +, that's why they are thrilled.
Read 4 tweets
23 Dec
The $600 is the least important part of the relief bill. Direct checks are a completely ineffective form of relief that mostly go to people who don't need them. We have millions going into poverty bc no PUA unemployment + permanent job losses w businesses closing.
Again, here was what was actually in the relief bill. All the items other people are citing have nothing to do with the relief bill. They were part of the omnibus bill authorizing the government's budget for the full year.
I agree that our government wastes a lot of money and we need spending reform. That's not happening right now or in the next week and choosing this moment to suddenly care about it and hold needed relief for Americans hostage is just dumb.
Read 4 tweets
20 Dec
This is a lie, and a shameful one.

Absolutely unacceptable from an alleged "reporter".

McConnell and Senate GOP have put multiple proposals on the table for months. Each one rejected by Pelosi, who openly said no deal is better than one based solely on areas of agreement.
House Dems put a ridiculous 3T package together full of stuff they knew could never pass the Senate and then refused to negotiate down.

Now we are going to pass something that is a lot closer to what R's argued for the whole time.
Pelosi freaked out at Wolf Blitzer when confronted with these facts and her indefensible and political refusal to negotiate before the election.



She even admitted she was switching up because Biden won:
news.yahoo.com/pelosi-says-sh…
Read 4 tweets
20 Dec
Putting aside that we know what the vaccine is doing and why that is not dangerous long-term, this is also illogical because you have just as little data on the long-term effects of Covid-19 and know for a fact that Covid-19 is way more harmful short-term.
Again, here is a good thread you should read to understand exactly what the vaccine does:
But this is where this spin falls apart. You're advocating for more people to get a dangerous virus that not only risks lives but also has potential long-term consequences we don't know yet because of the hypothetical risk of a vaccine that is indisputably less dangerous.
Read 5 tweets
20 Dec
No, that was not yesterday's update from the CDC. It was a report from one guy at the CDC focused on anaphylaxis incidents post-vaccine. He doesn't provide the data source, but 3,150 was the number who experienced health impact events.

Here is the report: cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/…
Here is the footnote he is referring to, but this could mean a lot of things. With most vaccines, a percent of people report symptoms like headaches/soreness because your body is attacking the vaccine (as it would a virus) to remember how to fight against it in the future.
These are the same people that originally argued for a herd immunology strategy because the virus wasn't that dangerous for younger people now intentionally playing up (MUCH LOWER) risks from the vaccine that would provide that exact immunity needed for such a strategy.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!