No, that was not yesterday's update from the CDC. It was a report from one guy at the CDC focused on anaphylaxis incidents post-vaccine. He doesn't provide the data source, but 3,150 was the number who experienced health impact events.
Here is the report: cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/…
Here is the report: cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/…
https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1340655838546026496
Here is the footnote he is referring to, but this could mean a lot of things. With most vaccines, a percent of people report symptoms like headaches/soreness because your body is attacking the vaccine (as it would a virus) to remember how to fight against it in the future. 
These are the same people that originally argued for a herd immunology strategy because the virus wasn't that dangerous for younger people now intentionally playing up (MUCH LOWER) risks from the vaccine that would provide that exact immunity needed for such a strategy.
It makes no sense. You are ok with people getting Covid-19 (a dangerous virus) because they are unlikely to die from it in order to create herd immunity, but not people getting a vaccine that might have some minor side effects for a small portion to create that immunity?
Right. The report of health incidents does not = health incidents that resulted from the vaccine so you would need a baseline (which obviously isn't in that report)
https://twitter.com/toog416/status/1340702434566529025
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
