To achieve a closer relationship with the EU, Johnson needs to be defeated. This won't be easy. Yes, he & his government are incompetent. But Johnson is a formidable campaigner with a strong emotional tie with a large part of the public.
He also control the timing of the next election & will use this to his advantage to destabilise the opposition & of course at a time of economic rebound. In view of our current electoral system, the chances of one opposition party winning the next GE alone are very slim.
Already measures to suppress votes - the ID requirement in a country where the State isn't obliged to deliver free ID cards- & the redrawing
of constituencies boundaries, will provide opportunities to leverage his support. FPTP is truly an abomination.
In 2019 the Conservatives got one seat for every 38,264 votes, while Labour got one seat for every 50,837 votes. It took many more votes to elect a Lib Dem (336,038) and Green MP (866,435), but far fewer to elect an SNP MP (25,883).
Why then, WHY ARE SO FEW PEOPLE CALLING FOR AN ALLIANCE OF OPPOSITION PARTIES? Surely it should not be beyond their wit to agree a few key "flagship" policies on:
- electoral reform
- closer relationship with the EU
- environmental policies
- a new UK constitution
& others.
Yes they would have to compromise (which is not a dirty word). Yes some may not get exactly what they want. But what is the (hideous) alternative? Another 5 years of Conservative government.
Would it be possible to make an offer to the SNP: a new referendum but only a few years after a UK wide constitutional reform has been implemented? Or a kind of gradual (rather than brutal) step by step independence with the possibility to stop midway & a close relationship
at the end of the process? I am not a constitutional expert but if Scotland decisively votes for the SNP, a referendum will become unavoidable unless the promises of a new relationship with both the UK & the EU makes the Scottish people give us a second chance.
Are we really destined to lose both our country &
the EU? I refuse to accept this. Our opposition politicians cannot continue with business as usual. THIS IS NOT USUAL. IT IS A TIME OF GRAVE NATIONAL DANGER.
Please lobby your MP and @Keir_Starmer@EdwardJDavey@CarolineLucas. Tribalism can only be defeated - and with this the Tories- if they work together now& get ready. There is no time to waste. The next GE may be much sooner than they think. Johnson is a gambler. As for us,
Let's be civil with those who are civil with us. Calling everyone else idiot doesn't win their votes!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This must be emphasised to Leave voters complaining about the 90 days maximum stay in the EU out of every 6 months period. THIS WAS THE CHOICE OF THE UK GOVERNMENT. IT DOESN'T WANT YOU IN THE EU.
The UK refused to include a chapter on mobility in the FTA, or any provision aimed at facilitating short-term visits or long-term stays. The only exception relates to the temporary movement of natural persons for BUSINESS purposes.
As a result, the FTA does not cover the right to enter (with or without visa), work, reside or stay of EU citizens in the UK or of UK nationals in the EU.HMG doesn't give a dam about retirees with flats in the EU or those planning for it. It wants to cut us off from the continent
I checked as I was alarmed by the letters to EU doctors reported on Twitter. The position is that EU doctors who already have a UK licence to practice can continue to practice in the UK gmc-uk.org/news/news-arch…
Here it isI
If they also have settled or pre-settled status under the Withdrawal Agreement then there is no other issue as they wont need to comply with visas requirements. The same is true for nurses
1/This is a good summary of the FTA in plain accessible language far from the jingoistic score card of the UK government. A few remarks from an interested observer. ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…
2/This sounds the death knell for the Brexiters' claim that the UK "only" wanted "a Canada deal". This FTA covers many areas not mentioned in the Canada FTA: social security, transport, justice & security, energy, nuclear etc. It is a massively wide agreement
3/ I will defer to experts such as @StevePeers@DavidHenigUK@CER_Grant but on a superficial reading, the agreement seems fair and balanced.The Commission notes several instances -such as mobility of individuals in non business contexts - where it wanted to go further with more
"For many others — among them bankers, traders, truckers, architects and millions of migrants — Christmas was only the beginning, Day 1 of a high-stakes and unpredictable experiment in how to unstitch a tight web of commercial relations across Europe."
British firms have sent employees to Paris and Frankfurt to set up toeholds on the continent. But for all those preparations, seven days are now all that stand between businesses and an avalanche of new trading obstacles on Jan. 1.
Britain’s services sector — encompassing not only London’s powerful financial industry, but also lawyers, architects, consultants and others — was largely left out of the 1,246-page deal, despite the sector accounting for 80 percent of British economic activity.