DarkOwhitE Profile picture
27 Dec, 11 tweets, 6 min read
Ok so I do time inbewteen tweets. Take those an translate it back to the boards. Any errors in math or transposition, please dm/tweet at me, or both. Looking at the AF for this one.
I made note of the cryo ref, then tied it to this bad larry becuase of that "white squall/storm" ref. First two snips are the AF's newest, from today at 1:13am.
Then the other two are from 16:17 yesterday.
Times subtracted leaves you a template (so to speak), that can be thrown back at the boards. So this is the reason why I'm pulling up said drops, I'll just lay them out. Content is really up to the reader! (Though I'll do some more content if I see some connects)
Drop 856. This was a wee striking. I couldn't help but notice the day of the 6th. We have one of those coming up, no? Not a straight delta, no sure that's how this machine works though. Not sure about that 11/11/18, drop 146 is interesting though. (justa opinion)
Next was this. 8hours56minutes is also .3722(repeating) days. So drop 3722. 11:11:18 was a from the last. Interesting that this is for 12:18:17. That tweet time in the pic is at 5:10. Not posted on eastern time? I get this time when I click the link. Again just an observation
I was prompted to check the mirror of that one as well. So I'll just post it up. 3722 is now 2273. The Mueller Report, RR, same topic/string? I dunno, just figured I make it user friendly.
8hours56minutes is also, 8.933(repeating hours), I ran it backwards, though other approaches can be taken, such as the third to first. So 3398 in this instance. I'll pull up that weirdos twitter in just a moment. Silence/hunted? Not so funny now? Maybe not to him!
Off until the 15th? From the 23rd? He also has dog comms???? Well well. That is very strange in my opinion.
Ok, we still got some more time variation to look at.
Now 8hours56minutes is also a straight 536 minutes. That 33k stands out, only because of the 35mil reference previously? Missing 2k? Potus recent tweet was....not sure if it's related, just another observation.
Now 536minutes also kicks down to seconds, 32,160 of them. Nix that zero for 3216. Loop Capital? Sure there's more to it, just a lamens view. Tweet is from a suspended account. Seen a few big ones go down today. Qtah and bards I think.
Autocorrect doesn't function for me on twitter anymore so sorry about any errors like that. If I messed up transpostion, DM/message so I can take a gander!
@ThreadReaderApp, please unroll.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EOwhit

22 Dec
Let's play a game. I'm not nearly as good as the monkey man, I still have the apptitude to look at so times inbetween. We'll look at the featured RT. Time of 8:56am for me, though it doesn't matter for time's inbetween.
Subtracted by (happens to be the first tweet of the day).
I typically do straight times with no alteration. I'm going to do something a wee bit different? Who am I? Is he part of the "Q" team? Our time diff is originally 7hours 38 minutes. Add Q or 17 to that time for 7hours55mins.
So I'll just run across the boards, though pay attention to the dates mind you.
755 is such.
Read 7 tweets
22 Dec
Some things don't change. Take a look at the time inbetween those things (tweets). This is a little different. Now we do time's inbetween tweets, ocassionally I do them inbetween drops. What about the tweet to it's direct drop ref? I'll illustrate.
This tweet from today at 10:30, subtracted from this one, at 6:51 this morning.
Ok the diffs look like this. We have some pretty short numbers, that gives us an option to throw a zero at the end of most. 3Hours 39minutes, so 339 and 3390.
Im just gonna run down the line. Make use of the drops as you see fit. Use your own logic.
From the time difference 3hours39minutes
339, 3390
Read 10 tweets
19 Dec
Time in bewteen tweets matter? DJT tweets this at 11:30am today. Now at 9:41am the second snip.
The diff looks like this. I'm just plugging in the mirror for the second. That would be 456. Familiar pic. However, this is on Rons' page too. He also RT'd one of our subtraction tweets.
Now Ron also RT'd this.
AT 8:57am????
Before the two POTUS tweets were even a thing? (by 57mins?)
Read 4 tweets
18 Dec
These are the two tweets we are comparing. As of now his newest for the first snip, today (both of em) at 22:13. Next we will do his second (that early morning one aside) tweet of the day, which is at 09:55am. Subtracted is such is the snip.
Alright so a few things I'll highlight. The link is an email the contains the phrase "chatter" this should be relevant in a moment. The next one would be plus 12 so 1230 is next.
1230, more sense in a moment, why 3099 is highlighted, plus those 113's, "Plausable deniablitiy" as well. We had 4am on our last drop 4am, a=1 m=13 is a difference of 12. So 4/12 or 1/3. Hence 131. We have four repeats here as well. Odds? I dunno.
Remove the 131, leaving 3099
Read 7 tweets
17 Dec
Users, should discern for themselves. Especially as far as the content goes. Though I'll spend time on syntax for one of these drop in particular, as it containes an ELS code within the syntax, should be a familiar passage for re-readers.
I looked at the Marines tweets today. The first from 11:09 this morning. Will make a note that three "shots" are delivered in the vid. 3*7=21 (just sayin). The second tweet(s) (is actually 3). At 20:59 yesterday.
Time difference looks like this. We can use other variations, it would make the thread much longer though. Lets just use hours and minutes, so 1410 is where we are headed. Peeps are going to have to discern for themselves on this bit.
Read 9 tweets
15 Dec
Code Monkey put this out. So I put this out. Next I removed the 46, why? Cause of the 4+6=10, so that clock matches the 1:1 ratio on the clock. Also drop 1846 is minus 25 from out current position. ImageImage
1846 is this. Now that 3:46 stands out. Previous time stamp boasting both those 46's in minutes and seconds. Also of not the |3| is a minutes difference, but there is a 3 hour diff in terms of 1871 and 1846 time diff (not considering the month/day.) ImageImageImage
Ok to get to this one I eliminated that (6(4)6). Sort of like how we zeroed the 46 from the first timestamp. Leaves 2556, hence our drop. Odds? Same pattern type as where we began. That 46sec to 27sec diff is 19? 19/91/16/61 has been used (as a key)? Coincidence or connected? ImageImage
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!