I’m so thankful my black father who escaped real segregation through the magic of books suggested I read James Baldwin and Earnest Gaines and Shakespeare and Maupassant and Maimonides and Aesop’s fables and never would have thought to segregate the world of literature like this.
There was never “white” literature in my house, or “black” literature, for that matter, there were books that mattered and books you needed to deal with, and there were subjects of interest and subjects of necessity. Mostly there was a sense of books being transcendent.
Also worth noting that the “non-white” work he would tell his students is more “relevant” to them is almost always—if it’s any good—in explicit and subtle conversation with tradition and therefore with many of those same “white” texts he advises them to sparknote. 😬😔
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
capitalism gets thrown around like an epithet these days. my brother didn't go to college, didn't have any family money, didn't have any social capital and comes from a historically oppressed group. still, he had an idea, started a business and sold it to a much larger company 1/
he's not larry page with it. he still needs to find new ideas, as he's only in his 40s. but in the space of about two years he was able to *transform* his life. he literally made something out of nothing. this is possible in the US. i don't think this could ever happen in france.
he was employing business school grads with MBAs. providing jobs.
Is there anyone working on a kind of sociology of knowledge of wokeness?
For those asking: I simply mean an analysis or genealogy of the relationship between the constellation of ideas gathered under the umbrella of “wokeness”/“successor ideology” and the social contexts in which they’ve arisen. I don’t mean an argument for it against them.
Ask and you shall receive. This is getting at what I meant:
“Cancel culture is the product of this transposition of moral rhetoric from class conflict to cultural conflicts around ethnicity and race.”
Kendi makes sense when he says “Black people don’t exist biologically or behaviorally.” But then he admits they do exist “culturally.” And he loses me when he rejects the legitimacy of making any cultural comparisons at all since they imply hierarchy. 1/
@ 29:00:
Any researcher who asks about cultural deficiencies “must create a cultural standard to answer that question. And once that cultural standard is created, cultural hierarchy is created. And once that culture hierarchy is created, culturally racist ideas are created.” 2/
So the argument is that any cultural critiques are inherently illegitimate or even racist. Each cultire is as good or bad as the next.
This argument is not new but I’m not sure I’ve ever seen it gain such unquestioning mainstream and elite traction.
The hard left––not liberals, to be clear––is fundamentally childlike insofar as it fuels itself and its fury on a vision of some future state of purity that can by necessity never be achieved.
The very foundation of adulthood is the acceptance of compromise and imperfection.
In turn, it's true that the far right fuels itself on a childlike nostalgia for the past perfect states that can never be achieved and in fact never existed either.
Liberals are the genuine adults, yet liberalism is being devoured from the left and right flanks at the moment.
Anyway, interacting this evening with the social media account of the far-left journal @curaffairs was a lot like interacting with one of my children. Just pure detachment from real-world constraints and circumstances.