1/ Lot of media coverage for UsForThem in the last few days.
For a small grassroots organisation they've managed incredible coverage and access.
While DfE won't answer NEU FOIs on how many workers have died, UsForThem get into government meetings in no time
How?
2/ UsForThem Summer newsletter was sent to me.
When you consider parents groups campaigning for more safety measures in schools, considerations for CEV families campaign just as hard, UsForThem have done very well in media coverage.
Page 1
3/ They even got a meeting with Johnson, for grassroots they are particularly legitious liking pre-action letters.
Take great pride in preventing masks being worn in schools.
Bit of an anti union vibe going on
And I guess having a mysterious non disclosable advisor helps.
4/ Everyone's entitled to their own views, but today I heard and read a few things from them that is questionable
I know they think schools should have no safety measures, that children are safe, covid is nothing to worry about but...
No evidence transmission is an issue in schools?
No evidence staff aren't at any greater risk, infact they could be safer because they are surrounded by children and they are lower risk?
Children should only be kept off school if they have symptoms?
Children shouldn't be tested
Unsuprisingly supporters of GBD who say just live with it, herd immunity supporters and covid deniers are all keen to promote a group that wants school to pretend there is no pandemic.
Back to my favourite thread of the year, everytime I think its out of date it comes back.
ATM I don't think Gov is intentionally pursuing herd immunity but pressure groups and lobbyists around them are, Johnsons decisions are political not ideological.
Sad thing is, none of us working in education want a battle, the unions don't, we just want a sensible approach to safety and reducing transmission, the NHS is going to struggle in January, blended learning till half term, vaccines could be rolling out fast by then.
This is how one of the leaders responded to the idea of having bubbles in primary school.
Sources that wish to remain anonymous have done some digging, they are worried about the backlash they could recieve from unpleasant supporters of UsForThem.
So will share their work on their behalf
They do make out that they have had considerable access and impact on policy decisions, bragging? Exaggeration?
Very good set of questions here, thank you to those who did all the work, I can't take take any credit for this.
Forget lockdown one of the key voices says. Then goes on with an explanation which describes how many feel about long covid
@halfon4harlowMP used to talk of blended learning, investing in extra space and staff but he appears to have abandoned this in recent months.
Happy to retweet UsForThem
Regular pieces in the Mail
Regular pieces in the Telegraph
So who is the mysterious benefactor and what work is going on behind the scenes?
We already have a lot of astroturf orgs in education and they all trace back to a handful of faces with close links to government.
Bit like the various campaign groups set up by Vote Leave
As a disclaimer, this is background work done by others, I made a decision to share their thoughts, some links to certain individuals can not be confirmed, but there are valid questions to be asked which I hope some journalists pick up to either prove or disprove
If you want to see how infections rose in schools from November to December, this is from some analysis done around time original Tier 4 came in, before these larger surges of hospitalisation, can we afford to continued at these rising rates?
Independent Councillor former Conservative explaining how she wrote an article with UsForThem with help of others who must remain anonymous
Get some interesting views posted on their Facebook, international pedophile conspiracies? Bit Qanon, I hope they report such posts
Just incase your wondering who DfE currently depends on for drawing up the magnificently inadequate advice to schools this year
CEOs and head of Public First policy and PR group who used to be at Policy Exchange schoolsweek.co.uk/revealed-the-s…
Next time UsForThem are in the media I want them to be asked to explain why they don't think asymptomatic students who have tested positive should isolate.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Oh @halfon4harlowMP this interview is a shocker for selective quoting, and it appears you haven't read or understand what SAGE have said about school and students
2/ "Transmission is low" You're quoting the PHE report on infectiousness of children, this line has done a lot of work in UK media and also in other countries but its a misquote
The report said they had "low confidence" in this statement, see for yourself
3/ Report did say they had high confidence schools returning would have significant impact on RO, they said the reports findings of low transmission could only be applied to schools during lockdown with limited student numbers and shouldn't be applied to September opening
@MaajidNawaz on @LBC
"Infamous Neil Fergusson"
"Suspicious pro lockdown"
"Exporting the Chinese lockdown method"
"Chinese propoganda"
Lockdowns are a Chinese conspiracy to undermine the West
Raising issue of pro lockdown bots, no mention of pro herd immunity bots and GBD bots?
So he's smearing Lancet and Richard Horton of potentially being Chinese stooges, raising issues of Chinese spies.
He says pushing for global lockdowns are good for China,China is growing after a harsh lockdown, but if we do the same its for Chinas benefit and will hurt us
The way he's just gone about attacking and smearing a long list of scientists, just stopping short of accusing them as apologists for genocide, yet he won't accept people criticising those behind the GBD.
Having experience of working with teenagers targeted by County Lines, decriminalisation would severely damage the ability of these gangs to profit, making fast money is a key pull factor for these students who see parents working hard but still struggling to pay the bills
Worth pointing out that its not just poor neglected pupils that are being drawn into county lines, I know middle class educators who set clear boundaries, and a group of privately educated very privileged students who all got temped into this world.
Its happened for years but the gangs are becoming more organised, better resourced, more violent and more manipulative.
County lines also comes from lack of a national strategy, London had a crack down and they just jump on the train to places like Reading.
1/ Thread: Summary of the Test&Trace Q&A for school leaders.
Friend sent me a link so I could see what they had to say.
Attendance was low, but don't worry you didn't miss much, "more guidence on the way" was a stock answer
2/This meeting covered testing everyone in secondary and colleges in the first week back, the aim is to test everyone twice with LFTs by 11th Jan and then to be set up for daily testing of close contacts to avoid isolation.
"Still working out details" was also a common answer
3/ There was some acknowledgement that LFTs are less reliable, they accepted there could be false positives, "a positive test needs to be confirmed with a PCR, these are the gold standard"
What are LFTs? Silver? Bronze? Scrap metal?
So schools are believed to be driving the new strain, DfE guidence was drawn up predicting low transmission.
Rethink now
If you consider the front page of DfE guidence it still says decisions should be made at a local level.
Remote learning can still count as a full education, government has defined this.
Every whole school risk assessment is now out of date due to new evidence
Every individual risk assessment is also now out of date
Particularly in Tier 4
Hancock "school age students are driving transmission"