1/ Oh @halfon4harlowMP this interview is a shocker for selective quoting, and it appears you haven't read or understand what SAGE have said about school and students
2/ "Transmission is low" You're quoting the PHE report on infectiousness of children, this line has done a lot of work in UK media and also in other countries but its a misquote
The report said they had "low confidence" in this statement, see for yourself
3/ Report did say they had high confidence schools returning would have significant impact on RO, they said the reports findings of low transmission could only be applied to schools during lockdown with limited student numbers and shouldn't be applied to September opening
4/ This one low confidence quote is doing so much heavy lifting to justify government policy when there are so many high confidence quotes saying there's massive risks of super spreading events in education if we don't have masks or social distancing
5/ When @halfon4harlowMP says there's no evidence of higher transmission with the new strain, this is a misunderstanding of the scientific use of "evidence"
There is no evidence one way or another until a study currently under way has been concluded.
6/ This is the same as saying there is no evidence the new strain is only as infectious.
No evidence is a neutral term, if they had proof it wasn't more infectious they would say they had evidence to prove this.
Its a misrepresentation of what the scientists have said
7/ This linguistic trickery has regularly been used by the government to spin scientists not having an answer into claiming their policies are low risk.
They did the same with a report on the risk to education workers, and now won't release the data used
8/ Reports on children's eating disorders are concerning, this has been on the increase in years and I've regularly heard how cuts to CAHMS has left the service unable to provide the support students need, we desperately need to invest in CAHMS and MH support in schools
9/ Does the report directly evidence lockdown as the main cause of a rise? Causes of disorders can be complex and varied,I'm personally encountering anxiety and MH issues in students who are worried about bringing covid home to at risk family members, exam stress also common
10/ In the last week of term a group of hardworking 6th Formers wrote to my Head to request remote learning in January, they correctly believed infection rates would continue to rise and didn't feel comfortable coming in for a variety of reasons.
11/ "Students are 15 to 22 months behind" Another heavy lifting quote which has many educators scratching their heads but is used on a daily basis to browbeat us into accepting an increasing level of risk.
Plenty have questioned how this figure has been arrived at by the EEF
12/ "Destroy young people's life chances" with a few weeks of remote learning?Life chances are connected to the availability of opportunity, surely we should be talking of ending the chronic investment in FE, as this is where students impacted by this year will find their feet?
13/ Didn't see the whole interview but I'm going to predict he also used the one day off school is 40,000 years of lost education, a totally meaningless stat that came from the Children's Commissioner's office.
14/ Its interesting how closely he makes the same points as the lobbyist group UsForThem who campaign for no safety measures at all in school, after they had meetings in government Halfon has been tweeting in support of them.
15/ Appears the government is still selling unreliable LFTs as a magic bullet, even ignoring the insane logistics, its just dangerous replacing isolation with these.
16/ As for the idea we currently have adequate safety measures, my timeline is full of frontline professionals screaming "we have no social distancing, we have no masks in classrooms"
17/ Now we have the Chair of Children in Need telling a member of Independent SAGE they are wrong about the role children play in transmission, interesting she makes a stand now when her timeline was silent on free school meals
For an example of how gov selectively quotes,PHE commissioned a report on lockdown measures based on data from 30 countries
It found school closures were the most effective measure on reducing RO
Why do they never quote this report of theirs? #edutwitter
1/ Lot of media coverage for UsForThem in the last few days.
For a small grassroots organisation they've managed incredible coverage and access.
While DfE won't answer NEU FOIs on how many workers have died, UsForThem get into government meetings in no time
How?
2/ UsForThem Summer newsletter was sent to me.
When you consider parents groups campaigning for more safety measures in schools, considerations for CEV families campaign just as hard, UsForThem have done very well in media coverage.
Page 1
3/ They even got a meeting with Johnson, for grassroots they are particularly legitious liking pre-action letters.
Take great pride in preventing masks being worn in schools.
Bit of an anti union vibe going on
And I guess having a mysterious non disclosable advisor helps.
@MaajidNawaz on @LBC
"Infamous Neil Fergusson"
"Suspicious pro lockdown"
"Exporting the Chinese lockdown method"
"Chinese propoganda"
Lockdowns are a Chinese conspiracy to undermine the West
Raising issue of pro lockdown bots, no mention of pro herd immunity bots and GBD bots?
So he's smearing Lancet and Richard Horton of potentially being Chinese stooges, raising issues of Chinese spies.
He says pushing for global lockdowns are good for China,China is growing after a harsh lockdown, but if we do the same its for Chinas benefit and will hurt us
The way he's just gone about attacking and smearing a long list of scientists, just stopping short of accusing them as apologists for genocide, yet he won't accept people criticising those behind the GBD.
Having experience of working with teenagers targeted by County Lines, decriminalisation would severely damage the ability of these gangs to profit, making fast money is a key pull factor for these students who see parents working hard but still struggling to pay the bills
Worth pointing out that its not just poor neglected pupils that are being drawn into county lines, I know middle class educators who set clear boundaries, and a group of privately educated very privileged students who all got temped into this world.
Its happened for years but the gangs are becoming more organised, better resourced, more violent and more manipulative.
County lines also comes from lack of a national strategy, London had a crack down and they just jump on the train to places like Reading.
1/ Thread: Summary of the Test&Trace Q&A for school leaders.
Friend sent me a link so I could see what they had to say.
Attendance was low, but don't worry you didn't miss much, "more guidence on the way" was a stock answer
2/This meeting covered testing everyone in secondary and colleges in the first week back, the aim is to test everyone twice with LFTs by 11th Jan and then to be set up for daily testing of close contacts to avoid isolation.
"Still working out details" was also a common answer
3/ There was some acknowledgement that LFTs are less reliable, they accepted there could be false positives, "a positive test needs to be confirmed with a PCR, these are the gold standard"
What are LFTs? Silver? Bronze? Scrap metal?
So schools are believed to be driving the new strain, DfE guidence was drawn up predicting low transmission.
Rethink now
If you consider the front page of DfE guidence it still says decisions should be made at a local level.
Remote learning can still count as a full education, government has defined this.
Every whole school risk assessment is now out of date due to new evidence
Every individual risk assessment is also now out of date
Particularly in Tier 4
Hancock "school age students are driving transmission"