Simon Stevens has said that 20,426 people are being treated for Covid in hospitals in England, which is higher than the previous peak of about 19,000 in April.

This compares two absolute numbers, but there are serious problems.

bbc.co.uk/news/health-55…
1. It’s winter and we always have more patients in winter than we do in April. For background context let’s compare occupancy and ICU for this December with previous Decembers going back 5 years.
2. Numerically there are more patients but just presenting that as a crude statistic is disingenuous because we also have more beds nationally than April. Without the occupancy % figures it’s impossible for anyone to understand what the inpatient numbers mean.
The NHS should show us overall occupancy, ICU, oxygen beds and mechanical ventilation beds for Covid and non-Covid.
3. This absolute number of 20,426 includes those admitted with Covid and diagnosed with Covid in a hospital setting. Those 2 added together are then presented each day as “hospital admissions”. Most people have NO IDEA the gov dashboard adds these numbers together!
This number should be broken down, by:
- people who go into hospital *because* they have Covid
- nosocomial infections
- those who are routinely tested when they are in for something else and have a + test
- and of those in ICU, how many caught Covid in hospital?
Questions to these answers would reveal how much of a problem community vs nosocomial infection is, which would help guide decisions about the next useful policies.
4. How many are admitted from care homes vs the community, again of value for guiding policy and understanding the extent of nosocomial transmission in care homes.
5. Update on staffing levels. How many are absent because of testing yet are asymptomatic? What is the latest science on asymptomatic transmission? How confident are we about the reliability of the tests?
IMO a responsible government and NHS would be providing this context.



The use of an absolute total is supposed to create alarm and therefore encourage compliance with with regulations. This tactic is being used repeatedly, which erodes trust and causes unnecessary anxiety.
I have the answers to some of my questions already from different NHS sources, but no one should have to be ferret around for it. It is public health information held by a public health body and belongs in the public domain.
I have asked NHS England for direct answers because it is in the public interest to understand context.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Laura Dodsworth

Laura Dodsworth Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BareReality

27 Dec
My feature The Detransitioners 🦎 was the third most read story in the Times and Sunday Times in 2020.

Thank you to @km_km_km_ and @thesundaytimes for running it and being an absolute dream to work with.

thetimes.co.uk/article/the-10…
I was warned to expect a backlash, and had a few refusals. But this was an important story and I knew I could tell it with compassion and integrity. The women who trusted me and took part are truly brave and have lived several lifetimes in one.
Creativity, investigation and social documentary must be intrepid, honest and from the heart. There’s more to come from me in 2021!
Read 4 tweets
10 Dec
It’s #HumanRightsDay
Please submit your evidence to the UK government about how lockdowns have impacted human rights here:

committees.parliament.uk/call-for-evide…
Read 5 tweets
23 Nov
On 19 Nov there was a coordinated campaign of over 300 tweets, comprised of accounts which look genuine and some which seem to be bots.

Who initiated this campaign and who deployed these accounts to push for online censorship?
This is a thread containing some information, some questions, and not many firm answers. The campaign was clumsy enough to be spotted, and it was interestingly timed.
Also 19 Nov, MP Damian Collins took part in a debate about #OnlineHarms

Read 8 tweets
18 Nov
A vaccine seems like the happy ending to the horrible story of 2020, but happy endings are not written in the language of coercive control, emotional manipulation and threats.
This is an example: telegraph.co.uk/business/2020/…

Another example is health ministers threatening mandation which would need changes to the law.
This will not go well. At best it is counter-productive and will be socially divisive. At worst people will lose more trust in government & science.

Happy endings do not include the loss of bodily autonomy and free will or the splitting of society.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!