(Thread) EU leaders are making a strategic mistake for the whole Europe by trying to finalise the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) now.
Let me explain why this mistake will have deep geopolitical implications. It is greed over geopolitical wisdom:
ANGLE #1: TRUST
Just in 2020, China has broken multiple international treaties it has signed up for. It became a rough actor which cannot be trusted.
Just in 2020, we have seen China blackmailing individual EU member states (Germany, Czech Republic, Sweden, others).
Moreover: China openly strategically blackmails Australia, our fellow democracy.
Therefore, we cannot trust what China promises, we need to have hard tools to force it to obey the rules it signed up for. Without this, it is a strategic defeat for the EU.
ANGLE #2: EU STRATEGIC VIEW
What China really wants from Europe is trade, as China sees the increasing confrontation with the U.S. Therefore, the EU is in super-strong negotiating position.
What the EU SHOULD want from China: China stops its aggressive espionage, China stops strategic blackmail of individual countries, China ends its genocide of Uygurs, etc.
So striking “trade-only” deal is a strategic mistake since this is the only real tool the EU has to force China to change its aggressive behaviour. It we do it, we lose our only chance to make China behave like a civilised country internationally.
ANGLE #3: GEOSTRATEGIC ALLIANCE OF EUROPE
Why wouldn’t the EU wait for the Biden administration, coordinate with them to have stronger principled leverage against the Chinese Communists?
Answer: Greed of German car industry
hypocrisy: speaking about the “geopolitical” Commission while pushing ahead without the big picture view. EU sells itself for tiny profits of few businesses.
As a EU country citizen, I am ashamed and saddened by this strategic mistake.
To my knowledge, there are five key reasons why the EU is rushing to sign this strategically stupid deal with China:
BAD REASON #1: A.Merkel wants German EU Presidency to end with this “success” for German-domestic political reasons. Thats why such a rush till end of 2020.
BAD REASON #2: The French establishment in Paris and in Brussels want to have CAI without coordinating with the U.S. to show the European “strategic autonomy”.
BAD REASON #3: German car & chemical industry and other businesses want to have this deal, so German government is happy to sell human rights and security principles for the profit of its companies.
BAD REASON #4: Political and business powers in Europe driving this stupid push expect that if European CAI negotiations were coordinated with Biden admin, more principles and demands would be put in so the deal would be delayed and maybe negotiated for years. So they rush.
BAD REASON #5: It is not only Germany and France. No EU member state has yet vetoed the negotiations, which shows there isn’t strong enough disagreement. Poland and Lithuania are now raising concerns, at least. Where the hell are the others?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(Thread) WHY WE CANNOT TRUST ZOOM FOR PRIVATE CALLS
Many people use Zoom for public events, which is fine.
The problem is that often Zoom, is used for private calls. Many security professionals do not trust it for following reasons:
The main problem is that Zoom has much of its business in mainland China, so under effective control of the largest and most technologically sophisticated totalitarian regime of today.
1) In the past, data of Western Zoom users were transferred via Zoom servers in China. Zoom claims it will not happen again. But: Zoom in China is under direct control of Chinese laws which force it to cooperate with Chinese intelligence agencies and be silent about it.
Which Trump era policies should Biden keep on countering Chinese hostile behavior?
I spoke to good friends who served in the Trump administration as career professionals on China policy. Here is what they think:
- what Trump admin really did on China is to impose costs for its hostile actions and China did not really escalate = its possible to raise the costs for China and it will back down once it feels a hard response (in sense of though sanctions and trade restrictions)
- Trump administration cost imposition strategy had two potential outcomes: either it persuades Beijing to rein in bad behavior.
- Or if not, we highlight for the world China’s bad behavior and take steps to protect ourselves and diversify away from dangerous dependence.
With Trump losing, let me spell out the Trump administration policies which Europe needs the Biden team to keep.
Change rhetorics, not most of the policies.
Let me run you though them:
1) U.S. need to keep being tough on China and Chinese hostile activities in Europe. We need to team up on this, be better allies on this global threat. Keep the pressure on Huawei and other Chinese espionage entities, keep them out of 5G networks.
2) U.S. need to be tough on Russia as long as Russia is aggressive. No Obama-era style naive reset. The Kremlin responds only to power and toughness. No appeasement ever works with dictators. Keep moving U.S. troops to Poland. Keep raising funding for U.S. European defense ops.
(THREAD) CHINA BLACKMAILS Czech Republic OVER TAIWAN:
Despite hard pressure by Beijing Czech second highest constitutional figure - Senate Speaker @Vystrcil_Milos takes a 90-person parliamentary and business delegation on August 30 – September 5 to Taiwan.
Why it matters:
On 10 January 10 2020, the Chinese Embassy in Prague sent a letter threatening the previous Senate Speaker Jaroslav Kubera - announcing retaliation against Czech companies operating in China if Kubera were to fly to Taiwan.
The letter mentions specific companies (!).
Czech Senate Speaker Jaroslav Kubera received the Chinese Embassy letter on 14 January 2020, during a meeting at Czech Presidential Office.
On 17 January 2020, Jaroslav Kubera met with the Chinese Ambassador Zhang Jianmin.
On 20 January 2020, Kubera died of a heart attack.
THREAD: RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE THREATENING LIVES OF THREE CZECH MAYORS:
On 14 March 2020, right before the borders got closed due to the pandemic, a Russian diplomat flew into Prague.
Read the full story, there are details on one FSB officer.
Here is what we know today:
As reported by Czech investigative journalist @bonicek7: He was picked up the chief of security of the Russian Embassy (= senior intelligence officer) and driven directly from the Prague airport by a Russian diplomatic car to the Russian Embassy in Prague.
This Russian „diplomat“ is in fact a FSB officer,serving at 5th Directorate (focus: Near Neighborhood,countries close to Russia).
Counterintelligence @biscz received anonymous tip saying the FSB officer will arrive,carrying two toxins: ricin & saxitoxin