First, climate change does NOT threaten "the very existence of our planet"
That is ridiculous. Not even the most ridiculous apocalyptic environmentalists say that
There was once the idea that Earth could become like Venus but nobody even believes that any more
A well-known climate scientist once told me that he & colleagues had attempted to model what it would take to create a Venus atmosphere on Earth with CO2 emissions. It required dedicating more that total GDP globally to the task simply of pumping CO2 into atmosphere
But Venus aside, there isn't even a science *fiction* scenario where climate change "literally threatens the existence of our planet"
How would such a thing even occur? There's not even a mechanism. The worst anyone could imagine was Venus and Venus still exists.
Moving on..
Biden said, "Without clear approach from other... emitters... storms will continue to worsen"
False again!
- Deaths from hurricanes have declined 90% in 100 years
- Every major scientific review says deaths from disasters *will continue to decline*
Neither the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) nor any other reputable scientific body predicts a reversal in the long-term trend of declining deaths, even if temperatures rise another three degrees or more.
“If you read IPCC reports, there’s no hint that we will be overwhelmed and incapable of responding,” notes world-leading IPCC-cited expert @RogerPielkeJr
“Even under the most extreme scenarios of climate change, future disasters will look a lot like today’s.”
Won't storms become more frequent?No!
The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) predicts the maximum intensity of Atlantic hurricanes and tropical storms will rise 5% in the 21st Century but their frequency *will decline* 25%
“Hurricanes in the future may be more intense than today’s hurricanes but in the context of a 90% reduction in vulnerability, our disaster preparedness dwarfs the change in whatever your favorite hurricane metric is.”
And there is no scientific scenario under which climate change returns humankind to the living standards of 250 years ago, when most of our ancestors were poor farmers, life expectancy was 40, and only a small minority of people were truly free.
If journalists who spent the last several years fact-checking @realDonaldTrump on climate change hope to retain any legitimacy, they must call out and criticize Biden's grossly inaccurate claim.
If @Jack@Twitter and Mark Zuckerberg @Facebook are going to flag content for being inaccurate, much less "misleading," for non-partisan and non-political reasons, then they must flag Biden's statement as totally inaccurate.
The New York Times is claiming in a long, front-page story today that recent fires killed "countless ancient redwoods" in California
The claim is false and should be immediately corrected
There is no evidence that the fire killed even a single ancient redwood tree
THREAD
As background, I love ancient redwood forests and helped save California's last significant grove of ancient redwoods in private hands between 1996 - 1999
This summer, I was the first to debunk claims that fires had killed ancient redwoods
In the U.S., the share of electricity coming from coal declined from 45% to 25% between 2010 and 2019 not because of "our allies" but because natural gas become cheap due to the natural gas fracking revolution
In fact, the carbon intensity of energy — the amount of carbon emissions per unit of energy — has been declining for *150 years*
Nuclear waste is the best kind of waste. All of it ever produced can fit on a single football field. It never hurts anyone & never will. It will be recycled in future reactors
Nice to see stridently anti-nuclear @SenatorReid acknowledge that it is safe where it is!
@ziontree I met Zion last year when she was spokesperson for radical UK climate group, Extinction Rebellion
When it became clear Sizewell was the most important nuclear project in the world, I reached out to her, and ended up hiring her, a story I describe here.
@ziontree Zion campaigned relentlessly for Sizewell, writing articles for Britain's largest newspapers, participating, appearing in public debates, and organizing a pro-nuclear swim protest in front of Sizewell to underscore the safety of nuclear