The enforcement of the Stamp Act 1765 by British colonies in America was a major factor in the colonies' war of independence from Britain.
But for securities and property sales, the UK itself has abolished stamp duty. But India has continued it even *after* independence.
Stamp duty is another area of friction in transaction. Friction slows down the economy. We just line up buying stamp papers, imposed by an incomprehensible English legal class.
UK has now even abolished it for property sales below 300,000 £ (₹ 3 Cr).
India continues to make it very onerous for small businesses and ordinary people. The Indian bureaucracy is colonial. It was never designed to serve the people, only to lord over the natives. This attitude continues today.
There is nothing "secular" about New Year's Day. It is based on the Gregorian Calendar, named for Pope Gregory. The change from Julian Calendar was made due to the shift in Easter. Motivation for this New Year date was also religious.
The New Year was shifted 10 days to account for Easter. Why was this particular day chosen? After December 25 for (fake) Jesus's Birthday, they counted forward to when Khatna happens.
New Year's Day is actually Jesus' "Feast of Circumcision" secularised into the Calendar.
No surprise, since "secularism" itself largely means secularised European Christianity. We have holidays on Sunday (Church holiday). Tuesday would be "communal."
Muslim professor of Islamic theology concludes Mohammad probably never existed. Fascinating, historical evidence for Jesus was always questionable, but more recent research is coming up with fundamental holes in the other prophet story as well.
Though evidence points to Ram being a historical figure, his historicity is not central to Sanatan Dharma. Dharma remains, whether or not Ram was king of Ayodhya.. This isn't the same for "Jesus" or "Mohammad"—Christianity/Islam have no basis without them.
This guy claims to be an atheist.
Has a meltdown because a Hindu woman just questioned whether Hindus should celebrate Christmas.
Doxes her and complains to her employer in the US.
Has no problem targeting a Hindu minority in the US to defend the world’s most dominant religion.
Check the size of the tech industry in China (including IT), and the number of patents they have in Artificial Intelligence, and then come back and tell me about the "English advantage" in your industry.
Only a moronic country has the medium of education in their country to cater to the less than 0.01% that may migrate to a foreign county. China is no moron. Guess who is.
A: Hindu-excluding scholarship schemes of @narendramodi govt.
Scholarships are distributed in religious proportion of the census. So Muslims get 70%+ of these. Hindus, of course, are ineligible, you wouldn't want kaffirs to get resources, would you?