"Lack of patience for stupid fucking questions, since you asked."
In seriousness, 'dress up a strength as a weakness' is dicey; I prefer 'actual weakness while also saying how I mitigate it.' "I get distracted so I keep a lot of lists."
"Why should I wait until I'm 65 for retirement instead of taking it in bursts while I'm in a position to do fun things with the time? As to short stints, that's a separate question."
Depending upon my mood I was "taking care of a sick relative," "helping a friend with their business," "consulting," or "researching for my upcoming book 'The Dumbest Things I've Been Asked in Job Interviews.'"
"Because the last time I tried Amplify it just spat out React/Vue components for backend AWS infrastructure. If it does something beyond that now then someone should check whether its advocates are accidentally under NDA about it or something."
"Google tells me 168,000. If you want me to approach it from first principles, then 'huh, I bet someone somewhere has figured that out. I should use a search engine to avoid repeating work to discover known things.'"
"Why would I need to know the answer? The reason I ask is because there's a terrific chance the answer doesn't actually matter and I can just bullshit whatever feels directionally correct."
"On which basis? For some, they're not going to be my customer after we finish the conversation based upon morality. For others, I can indeed smile and take the money from someone who's wrong. Most are in between the two extremes."
This is a great question. Start by learning, then implementing things that align. And turn the question back around. What do they expect at those milestones?
"There's extreme value in using higher level things that are provided for you. Otherwise you're going to be building things from scratch via first principles, which is demonstrated by this stupid fucking question."
Treat it as an irrelevant piece of trivia for the time being. Sell them on *you* as a candidate first. If they're that enthusiastic, the comp can change--or they can build a higher leveled role for you.
"I would sell the island to @FakeOracleLarry and then the people of every weight and hat time will cease to matter because they'll be getting the fuck out within thirty days."
"Why did you leave <discriminatory employer>" is code for "please explicitly put me in a position where I have to prove that choosing not to hire you isn't based upon your membership in a protected class."
"You can get fired from Google? I mean their Chief Legal guy twice fucked subordinates *IN THE SAME SPOT ON THE ORG CHART* and didn't get explicitly fired, so what on earth would I have to do to get shitcanned, not kill a product?"
"Enough to know that I just reclaimed this half hour, thanks for making it so clear up front!" And then hang up. Because fuck companies like this unless you're actively desperate, in which case take the job but keep interviewing elsewhere.
"Allow me to demonstrate making like a tree and getting the fuck out of here. I won't ask you to correct that metaphor because it's clear creativity isn't your strong suit."
This is a *wonderful* question, full stop. The answer is going to depend upon you. Ask yourself honestly what it is. For some folks it's "no." For others it's "lots of stuff."
"Based upon historical trends, I'd build out an 18 month roadmap. By the end of it nobody will care about the brand anymore and the crisis will have passed."
"Mayflies live less than 24 hours. While that has its drawbacks, the odds would be terrific that I wouldn't hear a question this stupid again for the rest of my life."
It's always true, it's always neutral enough, and you politely sidestep the invitation to openly talk shit about your fuckstick of a boss to someone who for all you know might have been in their wedding party.
“I’ve always tried to structure my career so that I’m the dumbest person in the room. It’s pretty clear that that isn’t going to be the case here, so let’s talk instead about how I’ll adjust to the transition.”
“I applied for this job a year ago and didn’t get it. I took a step back, applied myself, framed your predecessor for embezzlement, and am now applying again. Consider your next statement carefully.”
“I have a standing policy against performing actual work for companies during interviews, and I can tell that I’ll be doing that a lot if I work here.”
“…you folks know that you can buy tools written by experts to handle your build / release process, and you don’t have to build them all yourself, right?”
“If you’re asking me this question for the reason I suspect you are, hiring me is a win-win because I have no goddamned filter left so someone upstairs is about to learn something new.”
“You’re hand-waving away an entire branch of civil engineering down to ‘solve it on the fly on a whiteboard’ levels of presumed triviality. Exactly how much did Google Ventures invest in you folks again?”
I don't see what @chetanp does with respect to GCP, but it's a mighty big industry. I suspect we're both pawing at different parts of the elephant.
The single biggest impediment to @azure near-term looks like Old Microsoft playing stupid licensing games to win stupid prizes.
But consider this for a second: You're a developer puttering around in your idle hours. Your @azure free tier resources / limits are a function of your @GitHub activity (social or otherwise). Suddenly it's gamified and profoundly compelling.
First I have to verify a phone number (Google Voice not allowed), now they want a credit card as well. Which box do I leave blank to *not* get information, tips, and offers?
So far this isn't the experience I had hoped for.
Now to figure out where to generate API keys. Security Center? Doesn't look like it.