By divine design, our lives move forward not only in space but also in time.

Time is the divine calendar that measures our movements in mornings and evenings, days and weeks, months, years, decades, and centuries.
By divine design, time not only measures our movements.

Time also teaches us that our movements have a goal, a teleology, the eternal rest appointed for human beings at the foundation of the world (Gen 2:1-3).
The deep tragedy of life east of Eden is that, while time continues to measure our movements, it does not crown our purposes. We do not enter God's rest (Ps 95:11).
Time continues to measure our growth and our decline, our flourishing and our fading. And it marks our end: "We bring our years to an end like a sigh. The years of our life are seventy, or even by reason of strength eighty" (Ps 90:9-10). This is our lot under God's providence.
But it is not our only lot.

In God's providence, the Son of God was born of a woman "at the fullness of time" (Gal 4:4). Because of his perfect obedience, and through death, he has entered into God's rest.

By faith in him, we may enter God's rest as well (Heb 4:9-10).
The end of 2020 marks a year of many losses and the end of many lives. We need not and should not ignore that in Pollyannaish fashion. Truly 2020 comes to "an end like a sigh."
But 2020, like all times before and since, also falls under the promise of Jesus Christ's coming, nativity, death, resurrection, enthronement, and second coming.
In Christ, the alpha and the omega, the first and the last, the beginning & the end, time's arrow finds its target. In Christ, all losses give way to gains, all deaths to resurrections, all vanities to meaning and purpose. This, we trust, is true of 2020 as well. The Lord reigns.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott R. Swain

Scott R. Swain Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scottrswain

28 May 20
Here's a link to the PCA's ad interim committee report on human sexuality.

pcaga.org/aicreport/
A few quick thoughts following a first read:

(1) The committee did a very good job of addressing the wide range of topics they were assigned.

(2) There's a good balance of theological depth as well as apologetic and pastoral awareness.
(3) In a manner not reflected in some other statements on this topic, the PCA report offers a more complete description of marriage and sex.
Read 6 tweets
23 Apr 20
I've been thinking about an approach to pastoral encouragement/exhortation I've seen over the past couple of months. It's especially prominent across various social media platforms among a certain "Reformedish" type (though it's not an exhibition of truly Reformed pastoral care).
It always involves some kind of biblical exhortation, offered as a way of addressing specific forms of misery (physical, economic, etc.) that accompany the pandemic: "fear not," "be not anxious," etc., etc. Such encouragements, moreover, are often offered with great bravado.
Because it is the divine Word of the "God of all comfort" (2 Cor 1:3), the Bible is certainly the supreme source of encouragement and exhortation in times like these.

However, there is an *unbiblical* way of using the Bible to encourage and exhort. (In fact, there are *many*.)
Read 15 tweets
21 Feb 20
Once more on God, the Bible, and "being":

1. Theology happens as soon as one begins to give *reasons* for practices of religious devotion (i.e., reasons beyond the practices themselves), esp. when those reasons concern the identity and action of the *object* of devotion/worship.
(Theology, thus understood, is the *ratio* of doxology.)
2. Both OT and NT are *full* of reasons for worshiping YHWH alone. Both OT and NT are thus full of specifically *theological* claims. (Read the Bible.)
Read 10 tweets
23 Jan 20
In other news, while the NT most certainly is not a textbook on metaphysics, and while it does not offer a fully developed metaphysics, its metaphysical significance lies beyond merely the "implications" that we might draw from its discourse.
The NT employs many examples of the language and concepts of metaphysical discourse that were "live" in Greco-Roman and Jewish contexts.

A few examples:

(1) Septuagintal glosses on the divine name (e.g., Rev 4:8; possibly Jn 1:18)
(2) The language of "prepositional metaphysics," which portrays God as "cause" of all things (e.g., Rom 11:36; 1 Cor 8:6)

(3) The distinction between "so-called gods" and "gods by nature" (e.g., 1 Cor 8:5; Gal 4:8)
Read 4 tweets
24 Aug 19
Pastoral burnout is the *natural* (as in built-in) consequence of the attractional church model. Why? Because the model depends upon the creativity, cleverness, charisma, and crowd-pleasing capacity of the pastor/pastors, none of which are naturally self-replenishing or stable.
Contrast this with an external and ordinary means of grace ministry wherein the pastor/pastors may rely upon a divine design plan for ministry that has divine promises attached to it. Within such a model, pastoral weakness is not a liability.
Weakness is rather internal to it. Depending on divine means and relying on divine power to make those means effective, the success of ministry lies in resources outside of ministers. In such a model, pastors may lean into their weaknesses rather than hiding or running from them.
Read 7 tweets
11 Dec 18
The argument for divine simplicity from divine naming:

1. Scripture applies a number of names, titles, and descriptions to God. Among these, pride of place goes to "YHWH" and "Elohim" in the OT.
2. "Elohim" is a class term like "man." In ordinary usage, class terms apply to many different things that hold something in common: Adam is a man. Abraham is a man. And so forth.
3. In accordance with this ordinary usage, the OT applies the term "Elohim" not only to YHWH but also to other so-called gods, "the gods of the peoples."
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!