4/ The point of my response was to meet what I saw as a cynicism in his thread. I wanted to show that it is easy to see hypocrisy on the other side, and then impute selfish motives to everyone across the aisle but standard we use to accuse others can be used accuse us
However...
5/ As I did that, I wasn't careful. As you can see, in tweet 9 I said "people on his side," and I provided screenshots.
But in tweet 8 I lobbed the accusation at him directly.
I should have been more careful. So I apologized to @Ameen_HGA for that during our conversation.
6/ I still think postmodernism, CRT, and Critical Theory are horrible and I have not changed my opinion about them.
That said, I don't think @Ameen_HGA is operating in bad faith. I think he's being sincere in what he says even if we disagree.
Now, about the conversation...
7/ So, first a mea Culpa:
I have tried to be fair and even handed with people. When I say things I *ALWAYS* cite relevant literature. If someone challenges me on context I provide that as well.
When I get it wrong, I apologize to the person. No excuses.
I'm not perfect...
8/ My goal is to teach so everyone understands and nobody gets left behind.
I see people try to "win" a debate by using academic Jargon and refusing to explain that jargon to make people feel stupid.
It's intellectual bullying and I despise it.
That's is why I teach like this:
9/ However, I have absorbed some of thd nastiness, and it came out on @Ameen_HGA. That wasn't right. So I've apologized.
A couple of other points....
10/ There are many people (not @Ameen_HGA) who seem to think I am not well read, or have no formal education.
This is a mistake
Recommending me beginner books on postmodernism instead of the work of Geoffry Bennington or John Caputo is a tell that you have underestimated me...
11/ At some point that may become clear even though vindicsting my work isn't the goal. The goal is to teach and to get clear about Postmodernism and Critical Theory so we can stop it from corroding our society
12/ We did not record the conversation.
We both felt that we could have a better conversation if we did not make our conversation a youtube debate bloodsport for everyone to watch.
So...no recording.
That said...
13/ I think it is becomming possible for people to cross the aisle and talk. Maybe not agree, but I see shoots of growth in terms of a willingness to listen by some people. The atmosphere is still very polarized and divided. But, I think the time when people start to reach out...
14/ And do so in good faith is coming.
I think @Ameen_HGA will be part of that.
I will try to be as well.
For those in the know...there are postmodern Jedi (isn't that right @ConceptualJames) and crossing over is what they do.
/fin
Happy New Year
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@MeditarMestizo@NeilShenvi 1/
Delgado and Stefancic explicitly state "recently, critical Race Theory has expanded into other fields" and then give a list.
This is in "the Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education." Published by Routledge.
@MeditarMestizo@NeilShenvi 2/
There is an entire history of CRT in education amd many books on the topic. Routledge, one of the leading academic publishers has no less than 5 large anthologies on this with material going back 20 years.
To imply CRT is primarily about race and the law is simply not true
@MeditarMestizo@NeilShenvi 3/
Your bio says you're writing a book o CRT for IVP academic. I expect you to be clear about what CRT is and does.
1/ There is an entire industry of guys like this whose only goal is to front as "speaking truth to power" while they build a brand. "Social Justice"
*IS* the cool thing.
2/ I did an entire thread on how these sort of people monetize Social Justice on the one hand, and the turn around and accuse anyone who disagree with their ideas and methods of being in it for power and money.
3/ Books like "White Fragility" and "how to be antiracist" sell millions of copies...because that's where the money is and this guy thinks anyone who would say "this recent cultural view that progressive Christians are adopting is bad theology" is in it for money and power...
The New York Times helped destroy the life of a college freshman over a 3 second video while it's staff repeatedly tweet abhorent racial insults at white people.
For those asking, the latest jnfo I have is that Jeong still works for the NYT.
Again: THE POINT IS NOT TO CANCEL SARAH JEONG. DO NOT CANCEL HER.
The point is the NYT should not be pouring gas on the fire of cancel culture by giving it the oxygen of credibility...
Destroying a girls life with a snapchat video should not be national news. This is glorified Gossip. A story like that might be the subject of an editorial about how having a digital foot print reaching back into your teens carries consequences we don't know how to handle yet
1/ Jimmy Galligan got a 3 second video of a White 15 year old girl saying the N-word while singing along to a rap song. He posted the clip publicly 4 years later when the girl started university to maximize impact and ruin her life.
Guess what, he left his social media public...
2/ it turns out Jimmy Galligan, who ruined a girls life over a 4 year old snapchat video, made a video where he complains about being depressed in his freshman year of highschool because things he did in 6-8th grade followed him into highschool and he got judged for them.
3/ THE POINT HERE IS NOT TO CANCEL HIM. DO NOT CANCEL HIM
Jimmy Galligan knew how it felt to have things from his past follow him into his next stage of life and be to judged for them. Then he went and did that exact thing to someone else. However...