I love commenters who bring things I didn't know about! So lets do a thread on this together and find out what happened!

1/
So, the story does hold up, a quick google search brings us to this SCOTUS Amicus Brief, which tells us how to find the actual records about what they discussed!

2/
supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/1…
Now we go to the Congressional Globe for the official records of the debate.

I highly recommend going to the middle of this page and start reading from the point I've marked out. It's quite titillating stuff! But I will summarize the important bits

3/

memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage…
So we are looking for what was the reasoning behind the decision to count the votes. This debate did last two days, but the important part, the mindset of the VP is explained up front.

4/
The Presiding Officer (acting VP) Notice how right off the bat the VP says that there is nothing to be done about the electors! He says that they have to be counted.

5/
Mr H Marshall makes the note that under the Constitution, the only role for the VP is to open and count the votes!

And then he states there needs to be a way to resolve these contested cases!

6/
Back to the VP: he himself makes the point that his only role is to OPEN and the votes be counted..

Right there, you know that even in 1856, the VP did NOT have any authority to change electors.
6/
The Vice President "Considers that the only duty imposed by the Constitution was, that the vote should be counted".

Again, we have another historical situation that proves that Pence CANNOT change the votes.

7/
Vice President: "the only functions to be discharged" by the Vice President is to "open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted".

8/
I just love this little moment, that in all the debate, the tellers forgot to make out the certificates, and they put "laughter" in the official record!

9/
Summary:

Once again, the very historical situation put forward by Trump's supporters again completely destroys the notion that the Constitution grants the Vice President the power to set aside votes!

10/
I highly recommend you read several pages of this document; not only do you get a good sense of why the Electoral Count Act was necessary, but you can see the interpretation of the Constitution at the time is exactly on par with ours today.

11/
@BenVAllison How did I do in the historical department?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Casey

Jonathan Casey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JonathanTCasey

2 Jan
Figured I would do a thread on my top ten favorite reads of 2020!

It would be interesting to see who else has read these. So in no particular order:
The Boys in the Boat
By Daniel James Brown

Really incredible story that takes you back to the pre war era of the 1930s
Into the Fire
By Greg Hurwitz

It's Jason Bourne + James Bond, except better than either! I'm not a big Spy Thriller fan, but the Orphan X series is a a lot of fun
Read 11 tweets
31 Dec 20
This thread will debunk the notion that Pence can throw out electors on January 6th. This will be a super thread that goes over what the laws actually says..

Feel free to ask questions, I will try to answer as many as I can at the end of the thread!

1/
Quick overview (might not get to all of this tonight):

The actual law
Historical Examples
Specific conspiracy theories.
Q and A

2/
Election of 1886, Electoral chaos, Governors would sign one slate of Electors, Secretary of States would sign a different one, and in South Carolina you had no certified electors at all. The Constitution just wasn't clear on how to handle this.

A1/

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1876_Unit…
Read 44 tweets
26 Dec 20
Recent court rulings utterly debunk two nonsensical theories in MAGA land:

1) States violated their own law or the Federal Constitution.

2) The State Legislatures can choose electors directly.

1/
Wisconsin (Trump v. WEC) Part 1

“Wisconsin’s selection of it’s 2020 Presidential Electors was conducted in the very manner established by the Wisconsin Legislature."

"lost on the merits"

2/

democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl…
Wisconsin (Trump v. WEC) Part 2

"There has been no violation of the [Federal] Constitution"

Notice how this debunks the idea that Legislatures have to choose electors. Popular selection of Electors is the law (in all states), and it does NOT violate the Constitution.
3/
Read 7 tweets
25 Dec 20
This thread will debunk "the judges didn't look at evidence" nonsense that has been going around.

Over and over again, judges have gone out of their way to listen to the evidence and dismantle it, enjoy the carnage!

1/
Bowyer v. Ducey (Sidney Powell's case in Arizona)

"Plaintiffs have not moved the
needle for their fraud theory from conceivable to plausible"

This is a great opinion to start with. The Judge completely dismantles the nonsense brought before her.

2/

democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl… ImageImageImageImage
King vs. Whitmer (Michigan, Sidney Powell case)

"Nothing but speculation and conjecture"

This is a good one to show people who think affidavits are good evidence. Notice how the affidavits don't actually say they saw fraud happen in Detroit.

3/

democracydocket.com/wp-content/upl… ImageImageImage
Read 30 tweets
12 Dec 20
Decided to check out what was happening on parler regarding SCOTUS, their website is a horrific design mess, but it is interesting...
Searching the Parlor gutter for SCOTUS gold #2

This website makes me appreciate the beauty of Twitter, it's a hobgoblin of bad design that you have zero search options for!
Swimming the cesspool of Parler for SCOTUS takes #3

Seriously, this trash website will be dead in 2 years @RemindMe_OfThis
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!