1) Even while millions of U.S. workers lost their jobs, aggregate salaries and wages have only declined a little, by 0.5% for March to November. Part of the story: the crisis impact has been highly unequal, and job and earnings losses disproportionally struck low-paid workers
2) Income support to unemployed workers has been huge: total income from unemployment benefits in the U.S. was 25x (!) higher for March to November than in the corresponding period in the previous year.
3) As a result of public income support, total after-tax income _rose_ by a remarkable 8%, or around $1 trillion. This reflects increased support to the unemployed, but also the $1,200 checks paid to most American households (whether or not directly affected by the crisis).
4) At the same time, total household spending declined, notably because of a strong drop in spending on services (restaurants, flights, etc.) during the pandemic.
5) As aggregate disposable incomes rose and spending dropped, the savings rate soared: +173% relative to 2019. Households less affected by the crisis used the extra income and the money they saved to invest in financial markets or real estate, boosting stock and house prices
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Socio-economic outcomes (earnings, occupation, education) are highly persistent across generations in 🇦🇹 even as income inequality is low
Thread 1/6
The paper discusses policies in 4 areas to boost social mobility:
1) Expanding quality early childhood education and care (ECEC) can promote upward mobility. ECEC participation rates in 🇦🇹 have risen over the last decade, but remain below those in many #OECD countries
2/6
2) Supporting #youth with their school-to-work transition helps educational mobility. 🇦🇹 already does a lot in this area, but it could improve funding for disadvantaged schools and consider the appropriateness of "tracking" pupils in school at such a young age.
3/6