Floor trading and fintwit share an overlapping dynamic

"cooperative competition"

It'll be fun to lay out some basics of the floor trading ecosystem and you will spot analogies.
First an fyi.

The floor gave traders what was known as "time/place advantage". It was the first place an order became public if it was not an electronic order.

Let's classify the traders on the floor:

"Locals" and prop firms
"Locals" are independent traders.

They trade their own money and secure the right to trade on the floor by owning or leasing one of the limited seats which represented an ownership stake by the exchange's "members" (this was before demutualization)
You know prop shops.

Names like Group One, Timber Hill (IBKR), Jane Street, CTC, DRW, Cooper Neff, O'Connor, Cutler, Wolverine, and my alma mater SIG.

Traders representing these firms usually have a salary and bonus (discretionary, formulaic, or hybrid)
A little digression. There's a 3rd class of trader which is a "backed" trader which blurs local and firm.

These firms were usually tied to clearing firms and offered economies of scale in risk management, software, data, clearing rates.

I left SIG in 2008 to get backed...
From 2009-2012, I put up escrow with a firm whose business was to bankroll traders. In my case I got 70% of my p/l, and i could sleep knowing i couldn't lose more than escrow. Giving up 30% was worth it to me.
My backers were well-capitalized and allowed us to trade as big as firm traders (but our escrows ranged from 6 to 7 figures). We answered to risk managers as well. But for the most part we were left to build teams and businesses as we saw fit.
Now that we know the players, some dynamics.

Locals, since they are not as well funded, trade smaller and focus on extremely high Sharpes (although they wouldn't use this lingo), low capacity opportunities.
Locals tend to be seasoned and run tight risk. Many were very independent minded, more likely to be misfits who are allergic to jobs and W2s.

Firm traders tend to be more pedigreed, younger and less autonomous. They are well-resourced, well-capitalized, and can trade big.
The floor is competitive. If a broker lifts the pit's offer for 500 contracts, mm'ers fight for "recognition". Everyone wants an allocation. Politics, justice, and game dynamics is worth a thread of its own. The main point is that folks are fighting and scraping for market share.
But the floor is also cooperative. It's an emergent trust system since you are moving large sums of money by the sound of your voice.

Even a den of thieves has a code of ethics. Word is bond. Welch on a broker and she's not trading with you again.
This trust system is further reinforced by incentives. You are competing with each other, but the broker flow is the ultimate source of compensation. Everyone on your exchange wants the flow to keep coming.
There's an informal favor system or quid pro quo that ultimately serves the broker's clients not having errors.

Nobody, not the exchange, traders or brokers wants clients taking their ball and going home.
Finally, you cannot help but make friends with many of the people you stand shoulder to shoulder with all day. After all, you share common interests. You want to know each other's comp deals. (I joined my backer bc of such a friend)

There's more...
Every day is an interview. You are watching each other, sizing each other up, looking to hire or maybe get hired.

The info barter game: what can I share that isn't valuable but sounded valuable.

Constant sandbagging about what pits had edge.
"it sucks in here, nobody makes $"
How bout sniffing out disgruntled mm'ers at competing firms...a young trader upset with their bonus who would trade info for acceptance. They are dreaming you'd hire them (somehow oblivious that a willingness to divulge secrets is not a quality you advertise to future employers)
So the social dynamics in a competitive cooperation setting are a cartoon.

Sure you might get in a nose-to-nose screaming match for an allocation to the big order that came thru the pit in the am. But later you'd grab a beer at Suspenders.

Sam Sheepdog & coyote punching the ⏱️
Then there's the meta learning that comes from seeing what your competitors are doing.

For example, just noticing that your competitor is talking on a headset all day to their screen or Clearport trader then does something in the pit is good info.

Plus you now want a "hoot".
If you know that SIG sees global flow in real-time then when they are the best offer in vol in your pit you can adjust your opinions/models.

If Susq was a seller of BBH vol you might ping your mm camped in the DNA crowd to see if Susq was legging correlation.
Timber Hill had a model that removed discretion from their traders. So they were not using negotiation tactics to maximize individual fills but were optimizing for more holistic edge/risk targets.

They had a "box" with a model populated by all their tentacles of intel.
So every other mm'er in the pit came to see Timber's undisguised behavior as valuable market intel to calibrate against their own opinions. You could lean on their markets & "free roll" on their transparency
Learning from watching your competitors is common in business esp public businesses. The proximity to them is more similar to sports though. The way you learn from a coach you consider smart who does something unconventional like go for it on 4th and medium on the 50 yd line.
Or watching how baseball managers might shift their defense based on the batter. Or an NFL coach letting a RB walk in for a TD when the only chance to win is to receive another kickoff.

Everyone learns from this strategy that can't be hidden.
Anyway, Twitter feels like a cooperative competition. You can spend parts of your day shooting the bull with people tied together by the same callings of opportunity and learning.

Being on an upstairs desk can feel more like a library than a bazaar. And wfh doesn't help...
Twitter fills a void for me.

It's fun being on Twitter and I couldn't help noticing some similarities to the floor. Thanks for making the days more fun and floor-like.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kris

Kris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KrisAbdelmessih

31 Dec 20
For those of you looking to begin expressing creativity don't be scared.

1. Everything is a remix
2. You get better with practice
3. It's ok to start by copying (not plagiarizing)

The single most important thing to remember is that 1 pushup is harder than 50. So get unstuck...
I wrote this post earlier this year and it seems like the one to share for the resolutions and new beginnings crowd (I'm married to someone who gets excited by getting a new spiraled planner so i understand you folks).

It focuses on expression/creativity

moontowermeta.com/get-unstuck-an…
The links at the end are updated occasionally as I'm a fan of these types of encouragements. I urge you check them out.

They cover a few different ideas.

1. @davidklaing captures one of them esp well

"Covers Shouldn't Be Just For Musicians"
Read 9 tweets
20 Nov 20
Neat passage (where's it from?)

I'll add some rambling musing to this including the whole optimizing for grades thing (which btw I'm not wholly convinced is bad strategy despite the popularity of influencers to say otherwise)...
I was told that good grades were the path to💰 and i only wanted💰.

and i only wanted💰 bc i was lazy (not bc i wanted stuff).

Of course this was all mistaken. I wasn't lazy. I was bored & school does suck.
I didn't figure this all out til my fear of being broke as my parents went away.

That I didn't figure this out for a long time can mean a few different things.

Let's see...
Read 8 tweets
28 Oct 20
Let's do dispersion trading for the uninitiated.

The vets will need to bear with me, it's been 20 years since i traded index anything...but that actually shows why it's a good thing to explain. The lessons from it come to bear on thinking about all portfolios, even today.
First what is dispersion trading?

In its purest form, imagine selling an index straddle and buying the components' straddles in proportion to the index weights. In practice, liquidity makes this impossible. Instead one settles for a "dirty dispersion" position.
The trade is "short correlation". It wants the average corr between the stocks in the basket to be as low as possible.

Imagine a 2 stock index. You own the straddles on the stocks and you are short the index straddle. The 2 stocks rip in opposite directions. The index is unch
Read 20 tweets
27 Oct 20
A thought on premium in options.

Index options should be "overpriced". The question is how much premium do they deserve.

If stocks warrant a risk premium over the RFR it's because their systematic risk cannot be hedged.
Index options must conceptually inherit this premium otherwise there would an arb in portfolio allocation.

A index option, held delta neutral, gets paid as correlations in the marketplace increase. It literally makes money when systematic risk embodies.
A standard for deciding if puts are expensive:

Its price should have enough premium in it that by buying a put, if delta hedged, that you would actually have basis risk. In other words, it's premium should make it uncertain that you would actually make money in a sell-off.
Read 5 tweets
26 Oct 20
I sometimes explain how I use boardgames as a tool to teach my kids. The unsaid assumption is that "transference" works.

Paraphrasing from Yale:

Transfer” is a cognitive practice whereby a learner’s mastery of skills in one context enables them to apply it in another.

🤔

👇
I see examples of this all the time. Consider @Alex_Danco letter this week (I'm a big fan of his writing btw).

He writes about using poker as practice for decision-making practice. In the past, he's written about bridge as the cooperative, strategic analog to SV culture.
Kasparov has tacitly taken advantage of the fact that transference is a thing, parlaying his chess acumen into authoritative political strategy writing.

SIG hires world-class poker, backgammon, Magic, and chess players. On the Amex I met world-class bridge & chess players.
Read 15 tweets
23 Oct 20
Locking up your $$ to save you from yourself is a sales pitch in some parts.

I've said before:

"Any argument that says liquidity is bad because it exposes you to behavioral bias must address the value of that option."

Let's explore this.
First, why care?

Even if you want to lock up your $$ to "save you from yourself", that doesn't mean you don't deserve a discount for investing in something illiquid.

Your needs/preferences don't set the marginal price.

Don't be so vain, not everything is about you 🎶
The price of an illiquid investment are set by those who do care about liquidity even if you don't.

You inherit that discount the same way you get power windows for free nowadays. You get that even if you think you'd be better off with the exercise of cranking your own windows.
Read 28 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!