while preparing for the @CompliceGoals goal-crafting initiative I am really coming to understand more what a GOAL is and how those things are supposed to function in life

they haven't really been a big EXPLICIT part of my life ever
in my typical overintellectualizing way I will refer to David Abram's invocation of Merleau-Ponty's identification of the temporal future with the HORIZON

it seems that a GOAL needs to be something that you can "see" on the "horizon" even if not literally as a nomadic traveller
Merleau-Ponty is all about the "intentionality of the body" as it moves and grasps and strives for an "optimal grip" on a situation and so on

being in a landscape, finding one's way, navigating by landmarks and stars and a felt sense of something salient & important over yonder
in terms of Ratcliffe's "Experiences of Depression", a depressed being is deprived of horizon, there is a "fog" that mutes the landmarks, hides the lighthouses, the ground is just ugly mud and stupid dirt, no yellow brick roads of salience
we live by these phenomenological embodied navigation metaphors already in phrases like "aiming for the stars" and "seeing the light in the tunnel", "losing one's compass" and so on
so another word for "goal" could be "destination", just that then you get into the whole thing about "the journey itself is home" because a destination suggests a finality and settledness that may not inspire in the right way
but just the simple thing of a goal being a certain TYPE of structured intentionality, not just any kind of "large scale desire"

so "being more organized" is to me not an ACTUAL goal, but "shiny, neat, beautiful workshop" is, because I can SEE IT and it's DEEPLY APPEALING!
"being more organized" does not put my body into a state of active engaged intentionality, it just sounds vaguely bureaucratic and virtuous in a dull way

but when I envision the workshop in its dream state, then my body already knows what to do, it can barely wait
so I think a "goal" can't be some kind of imposition that you just invent or decide, because then it's not actually "on the horizon"

you have to LOOK TOWARDS the horizon and FIND the goals
which suggests that Gendlin's Focusing is a way to see what your goals actually are, instead of just "deciding" on them

"Your body, with its sense of rightness, knows what would feel right."

because the goals are already there IMPLICITLY and DIMLY and the thing is to become AWARE of them and SYMBOLIZE them in order to NAVIGATE and ATTUNE
this is also why I find @AgnesCallard's "aspiration" so interesting, because it thematizes this situation of attuning to values that are perceived dimly and confusingly, in a way that contrasts with the stereotypical "rational agent" for whom values are already clear and distinct

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Meekaale Brockman

Meekaale Brockman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @meekaale

3 Jan
it seems like you can choose where to put the mystery

“how come minds arise from matter?”

“how come experience is structured in a lawful way that suggests an objective material reality?”

the only answer is meta-philosophical, we can’t know why the universe is lawful at all
like you definitely cannot ever disprove the possibility of some type of simulation hypothesis, or divine transcendental creation, etc

you can only take life as a given and continue to enact it the way you are without EVER finding ontological base truth
is all of experience some kind of demonic hallucination created by alien Lovecraftian superintelligence? MAYBE, YOLO
Read 5 tweets
3 Jan
from the preface to Gendlin’s “A Process Model”

“It is increasingly recognized that humans must be understood as embodied: a theme first argued by Edmund Husserl and deepened by Maurice Merleau-Ponty.”
isn’t it very interesting that we can so easily pinpoint the time in human history, in the early 20th century, when philosophical thinkers discovered that HUMANS HAVE BODIES
like it does not seem like a big stretch to say that the history of philosophy is the history of a massive trippy hallucination
Read 6 tweets
3 Jan
trying to write down goals in the form of vividly appealing images that are both aspirational and attainable in such a way that bringing them to mind puts my body in a state of engaged activity with intrinsic motivation and a sense of knowing the direction and having a good grip Image
inspired by this line of thought from yesterday
which was inspired by doing the @CompliceGoals goal-crafting workshop pre-event exercises and especially this notion Image
Read 5 tweets
3 Jan
really great fusion of Christopher Alexander with @Meaningness @vervaeke_john paradigms
Image
Read 27 tweets
2 Jan
enjoying provoking myself with the notion that "the unborn buddha mind" is simply the body
there's a quote attributed to Bodhidharma that's like "where thoughts cannot go, that's your mind"

well,
an overarching transcendental living source that is prior to the mind, present yet hidden, mysteriously powerful, deeply wise & attuned
Read 5 tweets
2 Jan
Ugh, I realize there is a huge problem with the vocabulary and vibe of MacIntyrean “virtue ethics”, it just sounds so... virtuous, like the ultimate form of virtue signaling.
I can imagine a lot of people feeling disgusted, annoyed, or excluded by the jargon of meaning, tradition, morality, community, etc ad nauseum. But I think his view is interesting and valuable in a more abstract sense that doesn't need to imply any specific cultural conservatism.
MacIntyre himself starts "After Virtue" with pointing out how in our contemporary situation, the language of ethics has already been severed from reality, hence the "shrill tone and interminable nature" of ethical debates.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!