from the preface to Gendlin’s “A Process Model”

“It is increasingly recognized that humans must be understood as embodied: a theme first argued by Edmund Husserl and deepened by Maurice Merleau-Ponty.”
isn’t it very interesting that we can so easily pinpoint the time in human history, in the early 20th century, when philosophical thinkers discovered that HUMANS HAVE BODIES
like it does not seem like a big stretch to say that the history of philosophy is the history of a massive trippy hallucination
but also like wow it’s a very powerful hallucination and we shouldn’t disregard how much sway it has and how much intellectual work has to be done in waking up from it
a lot of talk about embodiment and so on has a kind of embarrassingly obvious ring to it like “oh you figured out that humans have bodies, eh” but uhh hmm are you so sure you’re not a bit caught up in a disembodiment hallucination yourself?
and contrarianly I want to probe the disembodied viewpoint’s own validity, like yeah yeah we are bodies, but you know what, maybe the mental realm DOES achieve some kind of transcendence that isn’t so easily waved away with nice & respectable contemporary embodiment paradigms

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Meekaale Brockman

Meekaale Brockman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @meekaale

3 Jan
it seems like you can choose where to put the mystery

“how come minds arise from matter?”

“how come experience is structured in a lawful way that suggests an objective material reality?”

the only answer is meta-philosophical, we can’t know why the universe is lawful at all
like you definitely cannot ever disprove the possibility of some type of simulation hypothesis, or divine transcendental creation, etc

you can only take life as a given and continue to enact it the way you are without EVER finding ontological base truth
is all of experience some kind of demonic hallucination created by alien Lovecraftian superintelligence? MAYBE, YOLO
Read 5 tweets
3 Jan
trying to write down goals in the form of vividly appealing images that are both aspirational and attainable in such a way that bringing them to mind puts my body in a state of engaged activity with intrinsic motivation and a sense of knowing the direction and having a good grip
inspired by this line of thought from yesterday
which was inspired by doing the @CompliceGoals goal-crafting workshop pre-event exercises and especially this notion
Read 5 tweets
3 Jan
really great fusion of Christopher Alexander with @Meaningness @vervaeke_john paradigms
Read 27 tweets
2 Jan
enjoying provoking myself with the notion that "the unborn buddha mind" is simply the body
there's a quote attributed to Bodhidharma that's like "where thoughts cannot go, that's your mind"

well,
an overarching transcendental living source that is prior to the mind, present yet hidden, mysteriously powerful, deeply wise & attuned
Read 5 tweets
2 Jan
while preparing for the @CompliceGoals goal-crafting initiative I am really coming to understand more what a GOAL is and how those things are supposed to function in life

they haven't really been a big EXPLICIT part of my life ever
in my typical overintellectualizing way I will refer to David Abram's invocation of Merleau-Ponty's identification of the temporal future with the HORIZON

it seems that a GOAL needs to be something that you can "see" on the "horizon" even if not literally as a nomadic traveller
Merleau-Ponty is all about the "intentionality of the body" as it moves and grasps and strives for an "optimal grip" on a situation and so on

being in a landscape, finding one's way, navigating by landmarks and stars and a felt sense of something salient & important over yonder
Read 12 tweets
2 Jan
Ugh, I realize there is a huge problem with the vocabulary and vibe of MacIntyrean “virtue ethics”, it just sounds so... virtuous, like the ultimate form of virtue signaling.
I can imagine a lot of people feeling disgusted, annoyed, or excluded by the jargon of meaning, tradition, morality, community, etc ad nauseum. But I think his view is interesting and valuable in a more abstract sense that doesn't need to imply any specific cultural conservatism.
MacIntyre himself starts "After Virtue" with pointing out how in our contemporary situation, the language of ethics has already been severed from reality, hence the "shrill tone and interminable nature" of ethical debates.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!