really great fusion of Christopher Alexander with @Meaningness @vervaeke_john paradigms
can't not ping @Malcolm_Ocean on this, it's like mythic metaphor design using archetypes and sacred places which lead to emergent goals rooted in vivid fantasy
also love this emphasis on mysteries, like allowing life to revolve around questions without needing them to be answered finally or straightforwardly, they can still be centers of inquiry and activity
this reminds me of a passage in "After Virtue", which perhaps has a slightly different vibe because of its emphasis on narrative unity
"the medieval conception of a quest is not at all that of a search for something already adequately characterized, as miners search for gold and geologists for oil [...] a quest is always an education both as to the character of that which is sought and in self-knowledge"
so that clarifies a little confusion I have about goal-crafting

the centers of my life are open-ended and irresolvable

I can't always make goals as if my life is "already adequately characterized"

my striving has to include the need for self-amendment and discovery
I've already started to try to symbolize the "monsters" of my life, like these "demonic entities"
some items are intrinsically beautiful and powerful in their centered salience, like the artifacts that radiate from every other page of Alexander's "The Nature of Order"

there is also salience from roles in activities, the quest items of life
"Just as a place can be a center of gravity that points toward particular activities and events, the crafted objects in our life might become touchpoints for entering mythic mode throughout the days and weeks of the game."

you have perfectly summarized everything I'm on about 🤩
as far as I can tell this framework is extremely valuable psychotechnology in the jargon of @vervaeke_john

I know there are lots of frameworks like tarot etc

but TO ME this seems extraordinarily applicable, non-sketchy, the perfect mix of secular and sacred, etc
like I was recently trying to get myself to be interested John Michael Greer's version of druid magic because it's a framework for enchanting the world devised by an intelligent modern person

but it was too cringe
I definitely admire Greer and sort of envy his "authentic" role within a practicing community of druid magic

and I like his way of saying that while philosophers have complained about the world's disenchantment, what we need to really do is to literally re-enchant it
but ultimately I just don't believe I can literally enchant the sketchy grove behind my workshop using a magic wand ritual and homeopathic potions

the thing about putting up big sacred stones is pretty cool though
here we also see a clear resonance with the kind of secular polysacral enchantment of daily life that Hubert Dreyfus talks about in "All Things Shining"
here is Dreyfus about rituals of coffee

and here is @kev_mcg making it clear how Christopher Alexander's style of enhancing the centers in the environment inspired by patterns is a way of reenchanting the world in a direct, material, pushing-atoms-around kind of way
and a good reminder that creating centers of life doesn't always depend on architecture or moving things, it's also a matter of perceiving and enacting on a more personal level
this hooks up to what Dreyfus describes as "beings swept up into public and shareable moods" that can be nurtured and evoked with gratitude and attunement, but not created by imposition and fiat

failed fiat creation of a shared mood is basically the definition of cringe, as explained by Sarah Perry
oh a stray thought that has been on my mind for a while that's a bit funny

if I look at houses as fields of centers, it seems to me that "sinks and sources" are powerful nodes

in particular this leads to a suspicion that we should treat toilets and faucets as very significant
the multiplayer aspect of mythic pattern enaction is basically what I find fascinating about Alasdair MacIntyre's conception of the narrative unity of lives within communities and traditions
so for me this is maybe the very central sentence of MacIntyre's After Virtue:

"Deprive children of stories and you leave them unscripted, anxious stutterers in their actions as in their words."
so @kev_mcg's game strikes me as an approach to MacIntyrean narrative beauty that can grow out from the situation that @Meaningness calls atomization, a viable and workable path for soothing our own unscripted stuttering anxiety
it has a more useful and relevant vibe by being grounded in actual fun practices like role-playing games and Minecraft without any stench of neo-Aristotelian nostalgia or Cath-trad RETVRN ideology

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Meekaale Brockman

Meekaale Brockman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @meekaale

3 Jan
it seems like you can choose where to put the mystery

“how come minds arise from matter?”

“how come experience is structured in a lawful way that suggests an objective material reality?”

the only answer is meta-philosophical, we can’t know why the universe is lawful at all
like you definitely cannot ever disprove the possibility of some type of simulation hypothesis, or divine transcendental creation, etc

you can only take life as a given and continue to enact it the way you are without EVER finding ontological base truth
is all of experience some kind of demonic hallucination created by alien Lovecraftian superintelligence? MAYBE, YOLO
Read 5 tweets
3 Jan
from the preface to Gendlin’s “A Process Model”

“It is increasingly recognized that humans must be understood as embodied: a theme first argued by Edmund Husserl and deepened by Maurice Merleau-Ponty.”
isn’t it very interesting that we can so easily pinpoint the time in human history, in the early 20th century, when philosophical thinkers discovered that HUMANS HAVE BODIES
like it does not seem like a big stretch to say that the history of philosophy is the history of a massive trippy hallucination
Read 6 tweets
3 Jan
trying to write down goals in the form of vividly appealing images that are both aspirational and attainable in such a way that bringing them to mind puts my body in a state of engaged activity with intrinsic motivation and a sense of knowing the direction and having a good grip
inspired by this line of thought from yesterday
which was inspired by doing the @CompliceGoals goal-crafting workshop pre-event exercises and especially this notion
Read 5 tweets
2 Jan
enjoying provoking myself with the notion that "the unborn buddha mind" is simply the body
there's a quote attributed to Bodhidharma that's like "where thoughts cannot go, that's your mind"

well,
an overarching transcendental living source that is prior to the mind, present yet hidden, mysteriously powerful, deeply wise & attuned
Read 5 tweets
2 Jan
while preparing for the @CompliceGoals goal-crafting initiative I am really coming to understand more what a GOAL is and how those things are supposed to function in life

they haven't really been a big EXPLICIT part of my life ever
in my typical overintellectualizing way I will refer to David Abram's invocation of Merleau-Ponty's identification of the temporal future with the HORIZON

it seems that a GOAL needs to be something that you can "see" on the "horizon" even if not literally as a nomadic traveller
Merleau-Ponty is all about the "intentionality of the body" as it moves and grasps and strives for an "optimal grip" on a situation and so on

being in a landscape, finding one's way, navigating by landmarks and stars and a felt sense of something salient & important over yonder
Read 12 tweets
2 Jan
Ugh, I realize there is a huge problem with the vocabulary and vibe of MacIntyrean “virtue ethics”, it just sounds so... virtuous, like the ultimate form of virtue signaling.
I can imagine a lot of people feeling disgusted, annoyed, or excluded by the jargon of meaning, tradition, morality, community, etc ad nauseum. But I think his view is interesting and valuable in a more abstract sense that doesn't need to imply any specific cultural conservatism.
MacIntyre himself starts "After Virtue" with pointing out how in our contemporary situation, the language of ethics has already been severed from reality, hence the "shrill tone and interminable nature" of ethical debates.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!