Thread by @TheSeeker268

The WHO investigation team will go to Wuhan. Will 2021 be the year to reveal the truth about the source of the new coronavirus?

"Compared with laboratory accidents, more attention is paid to the investigation of the 'animal' source of the virus."

rfi.my/6zZX.T

"Even if it is not a priority, perhaps a simple forensic investigation should be carried out as soon as possible in the laboratory closest to the market where the virus was originally discovered, so that it may be possible to avoid years of research on another clue."

Richard Ebright, a microbiologist and biosafety expert at Rutgers University in the US, believes that “reliable forensic investigations should be requested to visit Wuhan Institute of Virology and Wuhan CDC. The archives, samples, staff and buildings of the center." @R_H_Ebright

"It should include inspections of paper and electronic records, inspections of refrigerators & freezers, interviews with personnel, including construction, maintenance, cleaning, waste disposal, lab and admin staff, and serological samples and environmental samples in buildings."

"But obviously all of these are not on the WHO agenda...The scientist has questioned the origin of the virus since the spring, and he was particularly shocked by the non-profit organization EcoHealth Alliance Chairman Peter Daszak on the list of investigation missions to China."

However, he pointed out: "The Lancet magazine appointed him as the head of the Covid-19 Origin Task Force, and the WHO included him in the investigation team. This fact shows that the work will not be regarded as a credible investigation, but as a rough whitewashing attempt."

For Richard Ebright, the effort to bury the laboratory clues began on March 17, the same day Nature Medicine published an article about the "Proximal Origin of Sars-CoV-2".

"This article was considered authoritative evidence that the virus may not originate from the activities of the Wuhan laboratory."

However, this article and a letter in The Lancet on February 17 are not actually peer-reviewed scientific articles based on new scientific data, but a "forum" that "represents opinions only."

"The information exchanged by the co-signers of these texts has recently been leaked and released by the US-Right to Know (USRTK), an investigative research team dedicated to improving public health transparency."

https://twitter.com/garyruskin/status/1329161880175210497?s=20

"These e-mail letters obtained by USRTK indicate that the letter in The Lancet was carefully planned by the EcoHealth Alliance and Daszak"