1) VP Pence should refuse to read any electors on January 6. He decides he will read elector slates after comprehensive audits are completed in contested areas including a thorough transparent bi-partisan examination and count of ballots, security envelopes, and voter rolls.
2/
2) This must be allowed and completed by January 19, if not he will refuse to read the electors from those states blocking audits. Only electors from contested states that can prove by audit that the votes counted are legal and accurate will be read.
3/
And if the total votes compromised by failed chain of custody or other illegal activities are more than the margin of victory the state must hold a re-vote.
4/
3) The emergency compromise would be to hold a re-vote before the deadline for a Contingent Election in the House in any contested state under conditions acceptable to the state legislatures.
5/
There would be an agreement the contingent election representatives be bound to the re-vote results if the re-vote is uncontested. Otherwise it will go to a Contingent Election in the House without restrictions.
There is one way out, there are not many, compromise required.
/end
@cain_nate My friend Nate Cain and I have worked hundreds of hours with various politicians and legal groups trying to explain the election laws and how they fit together. There are many misperceptions of what happened during this election and what it means. citizensforfreeelections.org
1/
@cain_nate Simply put, our election laws are an intricate tapestry designed to ensure accuracy and prevent fraud. They work together like parts of a car. But when certain parts fail, the car is just a hunk of scrap iron and plastic. In this case critical parts failed.
2/
@cain_nate You do not have to prove fraud or intent, you just have to show that the election officials were unable to conduct an election that met the law and relevant certification requirements. In this case, the election does not come close to meeting accuracy requirements.
3/
@man_integrated@samanthamarika1@MikayesFiona@BuckSexton@cain_nate@KyleOlbert 3) The pro-Biden/anti-Trump coalition is playing run down the clock. This risks untold violence. 4) Constitutional remedies clearly did not anticipate this issue, there is no time to adequately investigate and determine the full extent of the compromise of our election.
2/
@man_integrated@samanthamarika1@MikayesFiona@BuckSexton@cain_nate@KyleOlbert 5) A solution requires people, the majority on the left and right, that believe in fair, honest and transparent elections to come together to drive a compromise. 6) There is time for something I call the “The Pause”. 7) Stop everything for one month.
3/
@PhillDKline Phill Kline and his legion at the Amistad project of the Thomas More Society are American heroes. They worked tirelessly for months to expose the truth of this massive fraud. There is still a chance to make this right. They have shown America the proof.
1/
@PhillDKline Citizens of the United States of America wake up today with the law being ignored, denied and broken by law enforcement, election officials, judges, politicians and our new oligarchs. Is this the America we believe in? Are we really going to let them take this away from us?
2/
@PhillDKline Our system is deeply broken, and foolishly distorted. We used to believe in truth but now dishonor, greed and power have bent our system beyond recognition. There is not an easy solution, but SCOTUS is about to let the country drive off a cliff.
3/
@cain_nate Read this thread, if you want to understand what is happening in this election. Bottom line: 1) extensive rules, policies, laws and regulations control how we conduct elections, most importantly, HAVA, FISMA and the state implementations of the EAC voluntary guidance.
1/
@cain_nate 2) Together they form the basis of what constitutes an open, fair and honest election. These laws require very low error rates to demonstrate trustworthiness. 3) They also have extensive legal frameworks for protecting the integrity of the election against fraud.
2/
@cain_nate 4) Laws and rules have been blatantly ignored in major Democrat controlled areas. The violations, by law, invalidate the “certification of conformity” for these systems. Under these various legal requirements a qualified validation study needs to be run after the failure.
3/
The fact is that there is a broad diaspora of Chinese “friends”, many are good people but many are not. There are principal differences that need to be understood: 1) Chinese with family and assets in China are at risk of extortion if not directly compromised. 1/
2) Due to massive economic subsidies from the West and low general standard of living in China they can easily afford to fund a massive influence and espionage effort in the West. Chinese ending up in labs, critical industries, etc. maybe innocent but you cannot rely on it.
2/
3) The well educated wealthy Chinese visiting our countries come from an extremely classist society. You have no idea what China is really like unless you have experienced it deeply, it is magical, yet sad and depressing.
3/
I hate to do this but you may or may not know me but I am a System Matter Expert on Provenance as related to Trust. I have consulted for the Justice Department, DHS, CIA, NSA, DOD and Treasury on Trust and Provenance and used to hold TS clearances.
We have designed our system to be secret but trusted. This requires guarded anonymous voting with the purposeful destruction of ballot provenance, by design. This is done for a reason, to avoid coercion while giving free access to the vote while still guaranteeing the count.