@man_integrated@samanthamarika1@MikayesFiona@BuckSexton@cain_nate@KyleOlbert 3) The pro-Biden/anti-Trump coalition is playing run down the clock. This risks untold violence. 4) Constitutional remedies clearly did not anticipate this issue, there is no time to adequately investigate and determine the full extent of the compromise of our election.
2/
@man_integrated@samanthamarika1@MikayesFiona@BuckSexton@cain_nate@KyleOlbert 5) A solution requires people, the majority on the left and right, that believe in fair, honest and transparent elections to come together to drive a compromise. 6) There is time for something I call the “The Pause”. 7) Stop everything for one month.
3/
@man_integrated@samanthamarika1@MikayesFiona@BuckSexton@cain_nate@KyleOlbert 8) Impound machines, ballots, security envelopes, and records on the election. 9) Do real, forensic audits of the vote. Start in contested areas but do the whole country. It must have observers from both campaigns. Anyone arguing cost is part of the problem.
4/
@man_integrated@samanthamarika1@MikayesFiona@BuckSexton@cain_nate@KyleOlbert 10) Make a public report before January 20. Options, then: redo the vote, accept the vote, go to contingent election in the House or risk permanent destruction of our republic. 11) A current Justice of the Supreme Court once said the Constitution is not a mutual suicide pact.
5/
@man_integrated@samanthamarika1@MikayesFiona@BuckSexton@cain_nate@KyleOlbert Driving forward without answers will leave the public shaken about our system, and half the population will believe the other half stole it. This is the only reasonable way out with minimal permanent damage. It does not even require a Constitutional amendment to investigate.
6/
@man_integrated@samanthamarika1@MikayesFiona@BuckSexton@cain_nate@KyleOlbert The cost is immaterial compared to what is coming. What we do with the report will show if we have reason left amongst us or are we headed toward something much worse. The American Public has a right to know, the politicians and judges need to get out of the way.
7/
@man_integrated@samanthamarika1@MikayesFiona@BuckSexton@cain_nate@KyleOlbert And yes, there may be some inconvenient findings but it is time to save the dream our country has been striving to achieve for centuries. We can afford a month, to look deeply into this or we risk driving over the cliff into the abyss.
/end
@PhillDKline Phill Kline and his legion at the Amistad project of the Thomas More Society are American heroes. They worked tirelessly for months to expose the truth of this massive fraud. There is still a chance to make this right. They have shown America the proof.
1/
@PhillDKline Citizens of the United States of America wake up today with the law being ignored, denied and broken by law enforcement, election officials, judges, politicians and our new oligarchs. Is this the America we believe in? Are we really going to let them take this away from us?
2/
@PhillDKline Our system is deeply broken, and foolishly distorted. We used to believe in truth but now dishonor, greed and power have bent our system beyond recognition. There is not an easy solution, but SCOTUS is about to let the country drive off a cliff.
3/
@cain_nate Read this thread, if you want to understand what is happening in this election. Bottom line: 1) extensive rules, policies, laws and regulations control how we conduct elections, most importantly, HAVA, FISMA and the state implementations of the EAC voluntary guidance.
1/
@cain_nate 2) Together they form the basis of what constitutes an open, fair and honest election. These laws require very low error rates to demonstrate trustworthiness. 3) They also have extensive legal frameworks for protecting the integrity of the election against fraud.
2/
@cain_nate 4) Laws and rules have been blatantly ignored in major Democrat controlled areas. The violations, by law, invalidate the “certification of conformity” for these systems. Under these various legal requirements a qualified validation study needs to be run after the failure.
3/
The fact is that there is a broad diaspora of Chinese “friends”, many are good people but many are not. There are principal differences that need to be understood: 1) Chinese with family and assets in China are at risk of extortion if not directly compromised. 1/
2) Due to massive economic subsidies from the West and low general standard of living in China they can easily afford to fund a massive influence and espionage effort in the West. Chinese ending up in labs, critical industries, etc. maybe innocent but you cannot rely on it.
2/
3) The well educated wealthy Chinese visiting our countries come from an extremely classist society. You have no idea what China is really like unless you have experienced it deeply, it is magical, yet sad and depressing.
3/
I hate to do this but you may or may not know me but I am a System Matter Expert on Provenance as related to Trust. I have consulted for the Justice Department, DHS, CIA, NSA, DOD and Treasury on Trust and Provenance and used to hold TS clearances.
We have designed our system to be secret but trusted. This requires guarded anonymous voting with the purposeful destruction of ballot provenance, by design. This is done for a reason, to avoid coercion while giving free access to the vote while still guaranteeing the count.
@TuckerCarlson@JasonMillerinDC@JackMaxey1@Timcast and my many friends, we are at a dangerous place. Our car has spun out on a tight mountain curve and is teetering, balanced on the edge of a precipice. We have highly unusual election activity, it needs to be understood.
Conservatives and others believe the election is being tampered with, in a major and concerted way. Democrats think this is nonsense, at least in public statements. It is time for both sides to realize that there is no way to put Humpty Dumpty back together for this election.
We can force this to be resolved through the courts and States but such a solution, will never be accepted by about 40-50% of the country. It will naw and tear at us for years. The only solution that can allow us to heal is one that gathers bi-partisan support.
Understanding “Deaths from the pandemic” is much more complicated than it should be. Trying to compare US figures to other countries is even worse.
1/
This is aimed at the political discourse, not a comprehensive discussion of the statistics or underlying science. There are literally thousands of moving parts. But I will try to give you some of the stronger issues so you have the armor you need.
2/
Political dialogue follows: 1) 230,000 deaths have occurred in the US from the Pandemic.
This number is overinflated compared to many countries. The US has a rigorous way of counting deaths and is overly generous in the way COVID19 deaths are defined.
3/