In a few years, when writers analyze the decade between 2010 and 2020, they'll mark the 2010 rise of the Tea Party as the beginning of @GOP political decline. It actually began much earlier than that, in the 1930s with their intransigent opposition to all change.
They will mark Kim Davis' refusal to obey #SCOTUS in 2014 as the moment Republicans chose anarchy over law and order, although the seeds were sown decades before with the election of Ronald Reagan.
And, they will point to January 6th, 2021, as the day the party of Lincoln chose autocracy over democracy in a last ditch effort to resuscitate the "white Christian Republic", the fevered dream antebellum southern ministers like Samuel Davies Baldwin.
On January 6th, in the U.S. House and Senate, our nation will witness the demise of a national party and our nation will be all the better for its destruction. Let's hope that what rises from the ashes is more a testament to Abe Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt than #DonTheCon.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with They Call Me Doctor Irvin

They Call Me Doctor Irvin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JefferyIrvinPhD

2 Jan
This video exemplifies the complicated problem with taking a moral stand and then arguing from there that legal, political, or "extra-legal" action should be taken, especially when you believe "the other" does not share your morality.
That Jesus and Satan are bandied about is evidence this is not really about freedom or serious questions about the accuracy of public health pronouncements. It's just about imposing your own moral universe on everyone else.
These people want to impose on everyone what the great writer Jim Harrison called "monomoralism". This is the idea that there is only one, narrowly defined moral worldview to which all should be forced to adhere. In the U.S. that monomoralism is largely Christianity.
Read 10 tweets
1 Jan
Ron06212876, the "rewriting" you speak of has been going on for decades.

When I was in grad school (mid-1990s) many of the "rewrites" you speak of were already orthodoxy in the history profession.
It takes decades for these ideas to be communicated outside of the academy and that communication is always haphazard, because most historians are mediocre public communicators and the amateurs tend to ignore the "nuances" of what professional historians consider paradigmatic.
A good "woke", middle-of-the-road work that integrates the work of professional historians is @jmeacham's The Soul of America. He is not a Ph.D. in history but he understands one crucial point of American history: that the U.S. has never dealt fully with its racist past.
Read 6 tweets
11 Dec 20
Reading a book right now and the writer used the word "recondite"--which I thought was an obscure way for them to get their point across. @adriandaub
Chapter two of "What Tech Calls Thinking" is all about platform building, the "medium becoming the message", and all the money to be made with just the delivery of "information". It makes me think of the modern oceanic carrying trade, and late nineteenth century railroads.
I'm a great admirer of the word "quotidian"--which is why I use it every day. 😁
Read 18 tweets
9 Dec 20
As I listened to Boris Johnson bellyaching about how the EU would treat them "unfairly" once they left the trading block it hit me: these people--let's call them "conservatives"--want greater economic arbitrage but always at someone else's expense, never their own.
Economic "dynamism" with a few rules they can bend to their advantage, or avoid altogether, is the conservative's aim. In short, #Brexit and the whole "conservative" zeitgeist revolves around the fundamental motivation of creating an environment in which it is easier to grift.
And, as they go about their grifting "conservatives" try to convince the populace that any lack of success among a majority is due to one's own personal failings, that it has nothing to do with a system engineered for their success, never yours.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!