Tweet

@ThreadReaderApp

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @EOwhit

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

4 Jan

I've been slow on the threads lately. Have to apologize, focusing on boiling down syntax. It's actually very interesting at the least. I would implore users to check out drop 574, to really look at it, every detail. Anyways.

Not typical with me. I usually start from a time inbetween social media. Not the case in this instance. No current SM that's I've looked at to lead me to 574, just got to say that. Email is from a Todd Mackler[r].

Naturally I went to see if there was an account on twitter. Came up with this. Not new, private though so I can't see any content. I did spy that tweet count. This is also where it gets a little weird.

Read 9 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

1 Jan

DJT time's inbtween. These two. This at 11:46 today. The other at 20:13 yesterday.

2733 has a link. There's the link from the post first.

2755 is next. 13:03 on that tweet time link. Also the link for the graphic. ncsl.org/research/immig…

Read 7 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

29 Dec 20

Just another re-read. Discern for yourselves. I took a look at the WH. These are the two we are subtracting. So DJT at 8:46 this morning. Then the other from the WH at 17:40 yesterday.

Leaves us with a format like this. Didn't run mirrors, though you could on several. 5436 was shifted to 3546. The vax is in it's begining or 1st stages of its phase 3 trial. So I used third to first on it.

1506
Keeping that post number underlined in mind. I'll also do this. Related to a deleted? Might as well pull up the math for a note.(At this point, the thread is done)
Not taking this route that is underlined, though it's interesting. I used 7,2,5 as a sort of "key".

Read 11 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

27 Dec 20

Ok so I do time inbewteen tweets. Take those an translate it back to the boards. Any errors in math or transposition, please dm/tweet at me, or both. Looking at the AF for this one.

I made note of the cryo ref, then tied it to this bad larry becuase of that "white squall/storm" ref. First two snips are the AF's newest, from today at 1:13am.
Then the other two are from 16:17 yesterday.

Times subtracted leaves you a template (so to speak), that can be thrown back at the boards. So this is the reason why I'm pulling up said drops, I'll just lay them out. Content is really up to the reader! (Though I'll do some more content if I see some connects)

Read 11 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

22 Dec 20

Let's play a game. I'm not nearly as good as the monkey man, I still have the apptitude to look at so times inbetween. We'll look at the featured RT. Time of 8:56am for me, though it doesn't matter for time's inbetween.
Subtracted by (happens to be the first tweet of the day).

I typically do straight times with no alteration. I'm going to do something a wee bit different? Who am I? Is he part of the "Q" team? Our time diff is originally 7hours 38 minutes. Add Q or 17 to that time for 7hours55mins.

So I'll just run across the boards, though pay attention to the dates mind you.
755 is such.

Read 7 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

22 Dec 20

Some things don't change. Take a look at the time inbetween those things (tweets). This is a little different. Now we do time's inbetween tweets, ocassionally I do them inbetween drops. What about the tweet to it's direct drop ref? I'll illustrate.

This tweet from today at 10:30, subtracted from this one, at 6:51 this morning.
Ok the diffs look like this. We have some pretty short numbers, that gives us an option to throw a zero at the end of most. 3Hours 39minutes, so 339 and 3390.

Im just gonna run down the line. Make use of the drops as you see fit. Use your own logic.
From the time difference 3hours39minutes
339, 3390

Read 10 tweets

Share this page!

DarkOwhitE

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @EOwhit

DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Like this author's thread?