Worth noting that teachers no more at risk (at time of publication) than other professions.
But also that 12-16 and 17- 24 had higher positive rates.
There is widespread geographical variation. This makes it difficult to apply a one size fits all solution.
SAGE had to balance that "accumulating evidence is consistent with increased
transmission occurring amongst school children when schools are open, particularly in
children of secondary school age” with the impact of closing schools on children
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do my level best not to propagate mis-information - which this from @bbc5live definitely is- but now this tweet has had over 1 million views I think important all in child health make absolutely clear we are not seeing a nationwide wave of #COVID19 induced illness in children.
And apologies to Laura Duffel as this is aimed directly at @bbc5live who have placed no context on this statement, I suspect knowing it would be likely to raise eyebrows.
Exactly everything we don’t need from journalism at present.
And to be crystal clear, the tweet was worded as to be technically correct. This is what frustrates me most.
The lack of a second, or linked tweet, highlighting the correct context demonstrates to me this was being deliberately provocative.