The rejection by the UK court of the US Govt's request to extradite Julian Assange to stand trial on espionage charges is obviously great news. But the judge endorsed most of the USG's theories, but ultimately found the US prison system too inhumane to permit extradition.
The US DOJ has already said it intends to appeal. The question -- and I'm hearing different things on this -- is whether the courts will keep Assange imprisoned while that appeal is pending. The court ordered him released, but it's unclear if the DOJ appeal will keep him in jail.
This wasn't a victory for press freedom. Quite the contrary: the judge made clear she believed there are grounds to prosecute Assange in connection with the 2010 publication.

It was, instead, an indictment of the insanely oppressive US prison system for security "threats."
Ultimately, though, from a humanitarian *and* a political perspective, what matters most is that Assange be freed as soon as possible. The US Govt doesn't care what prison he's in, or why: they just want him silenced and in a cage.

He should be freed immediately.
The full ruling is at the link. Savor the last, sweet paragraph.

onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AO…
The next step is that Assange's lawyers will apply for bail -- while the US Govt appeals -- based on the judge's ruling. The judge will then decide if he remains in prison while the appeal is resolved.

Trump could still end this travesty with a pardon, or the DOJ to stop.
Just confirmed: Assange's lawyers will request he be released on bail pending US Govt's appeal. The judge will decide that today. Ordinarily, defendants in these cases remain in jail pending appeal, and this judge emphasized how "humane" his conditions are in the UK. We'll see.
To contrast UK prisons with the dystopian hellhole of the US, here's what the judge said about how relatively good Assange has it in Belmarsh. She may use this to keep him in.

Either way, Americans should reflect on how barbaric US "super-max" prison system is. It's repulsive.
This is one thing Americans should really reflect on. The British are as authoritarian as it gets in W. Europe, deeply subservient to the US. Yet this is the third time they're refused to extradite on the grounds that the US prison system is barbaric:

By the way, the two people most responsible for the Trump DOJ's efforts to try to extradite and prosecute Assange -- after even the press-freedom-hating Obama DOJ considered but then refused to do so -- are Jeff Sessions and Mike Pompeo. Both are vile:

theintercept.com/2017/04/14/tru…
At the request of Assange's lawyers - who want to build their best case for why his current prison conditions are oppressive and why they can offer guarantees that he won't abscond - the judge set the bail hearing for Wednesday to determine if Assange will be free pending appeal.
The amazing thing is that when you mention Assange, the only people who pop up to demand he be imprisoned and prosecuted are US liberals.

They don't realize how isolated in the world they are: the only ones on the side of Pompeo, CIA & the DOJ. But that's 100% who they are.
Given the gravity of this case and the importance to press freedom, it is scandalous - yet revealing - how little attention US media paid to it, barely covering the proceedings.

Please follow & support the independent journalists who did: @richimedhurst, @kgosztola and others.
Statement of @FreedomofPress on Assange ruling:

"Today’s ruling is a huge sigh of relief for anyone who cares about press freedom...[It] means US Govt likely won’t be able to obtain any precedent that would criminalize common newsgathering practices."

freedom.press/news/assange-e…
The @FreedomofPress statement also notes:

"Virtually all major press freedom and human rights groups have condemned the US government’s attempt to prosecute Assange as an existential threat to journalists’ rights."

It's Pompeo/CIA/neocons/US-liberals v. the world.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

4 Jan
Mexico's President AMLO announces that Mexico is offering political asylum to Julian Assange, citing not only Mexico's tradition of protecting people from political persecution but also its "responsibility" to do so.
The reaction in the US/UK is predictable. The rules:

* When US or UK grants asylum against political persecution, it's noble and uplifting.

* When a country grants asylum to protect against persecution *by* the US/UK (like Ecuador & Russia did), it's villainous and malicious.
Recall that both of Brazil's center-left presidents, @LulaOficial and @dilmabr, have been outspoken in their opposition to prosecution & extradition of Assange.

It's hard to put into words how rogue & isolated anti-Assange US/UK neoliberals are on this:

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Read 4 tweets
3 Jan
A decision will be issued tomorrow by the lower-court British judge in the Assange extradition case. It's virtually certain that Judge Vanessa Baraitser -- who has been openly hostile to Assange, barely even pretending to extend basic due process -- will rule for the USG. But...
On some level, it doesn't matter who wins tomorrow. Either way, Assange stays in prison: if he wins, the USG appeals, and if the US wins, Assange appeals.

That means the US & UK get to disappear Assange *for years* without proving his guilt: just refuse to release him on bail.
The indifference, if not outright support, of most of the US media for the Trump DOJ's attempt to extradite and prosecute Assange -- despite the grave threats it poses to their own press freedom -- is repellent but predictable. I explained here this week:

greenwald.substack.com/p/the-kafkaesq…
Read 6 tweets
3 Jan
This is honestly one of the most hilarious mega-viral tweets I've ever seen on Twitter.

As an undercover CIA operative, @HurdOnTheHill "saw firsthand how our enemies" -- who? "our enemies" -- "steal elections and try to interfere in ours." That's what he saw at CIA.

😂😂😂

🇺🇸
The major reason that tweet from Rep. Hurd went so viral is it's a GOP politician condemning claims of voter fraud.

But a subsidiary reason is that Americans love to hear how it's **other countries** -- the Bad Ones -- that "steal elections and interfere" in others' politics. 🇺🇸
Sorry, just have to repeat this in what I'm sure is a futile effort to get it out of my system and stop laughing so I can do other things today:

"When I was undercover at the CIA, I saw firsthand how our enemies steal elections and try to interfere in ours."
Read 4 tweets
1 Jan
Democrats — including numerous Dem Party-aligned journalists — have spent all day smearing 2 Politico reporters as misogynistic because they had the sexist audacity to report on the very lucrative relationship between Janet Yellen & Wall St., the industry she’s about to regulate:
There are so many remarkably dumb and bad faith components to this accusation, beginning with their central claim — that only women (like Yellen & Hillary) have their Wall St largesse scrutinized when they’re about to assume large amounts of political power. Here’s 2 examples:
What’s wrong with this misogyny accusation? Everything.

The most glaring and inexcusable: their smear relies on the assertion that only women get this kind of media scrutiny even though **the very same article** extensively scrutinizes the Wall St ties of Antony Blinken, a man.
Read 12 tweets
31 Dec 20
The Kafkaesque Imprisonment of Julian Assange Exposes U.S. Myths About Freedom and Tyranny

greenwald.substack.com/p/the-kafkaesq…
"The real measure of how free is a society is not how its mainstream, well-behaved ruling class servants are treated, but the fate of its actual dissidents....Royal court vassals always end up fine: rewarded for their subservience and thus convinced that freedoms abound."
How you determine whether a society is *truly* free, whether it truly guarantees basic civic rights and civil liberties -- or whether it's just an illusory tool of propaganda: Image
Read 6 tweets
30 Dec 20
The smug football-spiking glee over Luke Letlow's death at 41 is one of the most repulsive things I've seen on this site.

Celebrating death is repugnant in all cases but he wasn't a COVID denier. Urging that the costs of isolation & economic ruin be considered isn't denialism:
Many deaths are caused by careless choices: people don't eat well; they don't exercise; they smoke, drink or take drugs; they don't have safe sex; they drive when tired.

But we still mourn their deaths as tragic, not giggle that they got what they deserved -- except sociopaths. Image
A top Biden WH aide, Rep. Cedric Richmond, just tested positive for COVID after he traveled to an Atlanta political rally for Ossoff and Warnock, rather than staying isolated at home. Do you think that's karmic justice, that if he dies it's just deserts?

ca.news.yahoo.com/biden-adviser-…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!