The funny thing is that Dore's #ForceTheVote wouldn't have even happened if the Squad just did what they were hired to do, which is organize a challenge to the speakership. The M4A floor vote thing was just a last ditch stand-in for that.
That's why all the influencer nerds trying to nitpick this to death about procedure and utility of a vote are missing the point. But that's their job: Drain the politics out of a conflict and pretend it's about procedure, pragmatism, etc. Always obfuscate and protect the brand.
The continued viability of the Left™ Inc. industrial complex — donations, eyeballs, jobs, subscriptions, retweets — is now staked on the political celebrity of AOC (and the Squad). There is a strong need to maintain that edgy, oppositional image and brand, despite no results.
Leftism™ Inc. needs M4A to just be one small issue in the Leftist lifestyle brand. The brand is the priority for them. But M4A is a huge issue that brings in a lot of people who want the policy but don't care about the lifestyle brand. That's why Leftism™ Inc. really hated this
But as I said, this wasn't really even about M4A. It's about exposing the lack of a real populist, anti-establishment bloc in the party.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shant Mesrobian

Shant Mesrobian Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShantMM

23 Sep 20
It's silly to pretend that we don't use religiosity as a signal of political ideology and affiliation. We of course do, because it is: ImageImageImageImage
*Which* religion, the *denomination* of the religion, and *level* of religiosity all play a role in bias, because they all correlate with political ideology and affiliation. These are all signals.
I think it's undeniable that there is an anti-religious bias in elite media, but it manifests mostly when it is perceived that religion is being channeled into a conservative politics. When that happens, religiosity becomes incorporated into the assessment of the threat level.
Read 5 tweets
15 Sep 20
Let me try to decode the Cuties thing: The Cuties thing is all about an aggrieved class wanting to expose their perceived elites to be immoral demons.
Populist, anti-elite sentiments are always driven by the desire to cast the opposition as the immoral class (which is natural, morality is how we govern our world). This is what is behind QAnon's obsession with pedophilia — the desire to expose an elite cabal as morally depraved.
When people hit back at the anti-Cuties people (anti-anti-Cuties) — calling them QAnon dummies and what not — that's the elites sensing the revolt and whacking the plebs back into their place. The elites are telling the people who are revolting that they are stupid.
Read 7 tweets
10 Sep 20
So I have an analogy that I think is useful for understanding our current obsession with victimhood — one that I think is more constructive than the common critiques. In the modern discourse we’ve created, a victimhood claim is like paying mafia protection money. I’ll explain.
When it comes to victimhood culture, I think people focus too much on what claims of victimhood allow people to *attain* and not enough on what it allows people to *avoid*. For people who want to understand political culture right now, the second is much more illuminating.
Most commentary and research about claims of victimhood and the adoption of oppression identities tend to focus on how these claims are intended as ways of garnering attention, status, material transfer, etc.
Read 17 tweets
6 Sep 20
The idea that this stuff will all go away if Biden wins does seem a bit naive to me. In fact people may take away the lesson that it's a winning form of politics and the basis for a durable political coalition (insert Trump wrong gif).

It's not like this is just some emotional outlet or form of catharsis for people angry about Trump. There is an entire incentive structure that's become embedded into institutions, from management on down. Those incentives don't just go away.
And if you look at the protests and riots, they are largely happening in the most liberal cities under the most liberal leadership. Liberal white males. Sounds like a Biden administration to me.
Read 5 tweets
4 Sep 20
I've never read an interesting tweet about Trump.
News about Trump can often be interesting or entertaining. But tweets about Trump are by far the most boring tweets.
The only interesting tweets about Trump are the ones he writes himself.
Read 4 tweets
3 Sep 20
Social media has rotted your entire political project, Micah...

A strong data point in support of this is the professional left's penchant for employing slogans that do the exact opposite of what any rational, outcome-focused political project would do.

Usually, a political slogan will be designed to make a particular policy broader and more palatable to the public. More in line with mainstream preferences and beliefs. The professional Left tends to do the exact opposite.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!