You may have heard of Bill A416, a proposed law in New York that would grant the Governor the ability to imprison or deport anyone he deems to be a "public health threat".
But it's actually way worse than that.
Not only does A416 give Cuomo the ability to detain and remove people without trial, appeal or oversight, it would also grant that power to anyone he wishes. "Including, but not limited to" means pretty much whoever he wants.
This bill turns the Governor into an overlord who can appoint anyone he wishes to remove whomever they wish, as long as they decide that person is a "threat".
Given the government's track record on civil liberties, just picture how that could be used in the future.
The reference to "clear and convincing evidence" is a smokescreen, because there's no due process here for them to have to prove it in court. Every person in NY can be ruled a "threat".
This isn't guilty until proven innocent. This is guilty with no chance to prove innocence.
Republicans in Albany will complain, watch it pass & then do nothing to get rid of it, just like every other bad law or regulation in NY.
@lpnyofficial is fighting to stop A416 from passing, & has been the only consistent voice of opposition against King Cuomo. Join them today!
The reason for the protests and riots that are happening right now, is for reasons that are way more similar to why the BLM protests and riots happened than either side is willing to admit.
At the core of these riots, at the core of why they voted for Trump in the first place, is frustration and fear over what they see around them: lost jobs, low wages, the cost of living skyrocketing out of control.
Simply put: people who are happy and comfortable don't riot.
The problem is that they're misplacing their anger and rage. This isn't about left vs. right, Republican vs. Democrat, White vs. Black.
It's about the people vs. a relative handful of incredibly powerful politicians and cronies (including Trump and Biden) who rob us every day.
An incredibly troubling part of mainstream American political discourse is the assumption that the US military can kill anyone, anywhere, even civilians ("casualties/broken eggs for the omelette"), and it is simply unacceptable for anyone to fight back to try to not be killed.
While the people who believe this probably also think that they are "supporting the troops", in reality they're dooming them to be sent off to perpetual war.
If the military industrial complex can kill whenever they want, they will, and it's the troops they send off to do it.
Example of this sentiment:
"I don't support our involvement in this war, but we should be aggressive against anyone who fights our troops there."
If our troops shouldn't be there, why should the people who live there simply allow themselves to be killed and not fight back?
If you stream copyrighted content without permission, you're now a federal felon, punishable by jail time, fines, losing your right to vote or own a firearm, etc.
But they gave you $600 of your own money though.
And before you ask: yes, it's a bipartisan proposal.
Ds and Rs always stop play-fighting whenever there's a chance to criminalize you and make your lives harder.
PERSPECTIVE: they just robbed you of about $2750 each and gave you $600 of it back, but if you watch a pirated copy of Mandalorian you could end up in prison, unable to ever get a business license, buried in fines for the rest of your life...
#CleanEnergy should be a priority for the next administration. Yet, neither the Republicans or Democrats have Nuclear Energy at the forefront of their plans.
Instead, Republicrats continue to increase subsidies to the fossil fuel industry.
Conservative estimates put U.S. direct subsidies to the fossil fuel industry at roughly $20 billion per year; with 20% currently allocated to coal and 80% to natural gas and crude oil.
The environment and global climate change is such an important issue, but one that is often filled with misinformation. Regardless of any one person's thoughts on the issue, caring for the environment and reducing harmful pollutants is always something to strive for.
Frederick Banting discovered insulin in 1923, he refused to put his name on the patent. He felt it was unethical for a doctor to profit from a discovery that would save lives. The patent was sold to University of Toronto for $1. They wanted their medication to remain affordable.
It is now 97 years after the original insulin patent was sold, and there currently no true generic Insulin products on the market.