THREAD: In 2013, Wade "It's time for me to get mine!" Robson debuted his tall tale accusations to universal disbelief, even among heavily guilt-centric audiences.
Of all pundits, Harvey Levin & TMZ staff were actually the most vocal in pointing out the absurdity of his claims.
When the details of Wade's claims first emerged and following his NBC tell-all, the overwhelming majority of TMZ's userbase (who have always been critical of MJ) also doubted them.
- 92% Didn't Believe Wade (168,500)
- 75% Wade Big Fat Liar (412,713)
- 75% MJ Not Pedo (612,329)
Initial sources in TMZ's circle suggested Wade's claims were based on "repressed memories" - The unfounded junk science commonly used in false CSA accusations (including those made against MJ by Kapon and Bartucci Jr.).
Wade made a point to tell Lauer it wasn't repressed memory.
TMZ correctly noted the lawsuit was about "wanting money from the estate" despite Wade claiming otherwise.
They showed videos of people calling the claims out, including Omarion & Joe Jackson.
They included Mesereau quote: "Why call yourself a creditor if it's not about money?"
TMZ aired a phone call w/ Debbie Rowe who expressed staunch disbelief about these claims—Levin agreed.
DEBBIE ROWE: Wade's publicity-seeking attempt is opportunistic & oozes in falseness. It will quickly be forgotten and will do nothing to tarnish MJ's extraordinary legacy.
While sources suggested to TMZ that Wade had "substantial savings" as a wealthy entertainer, they also interviewed Thomas Mesereau who heard what would be proven more accurate.
MESEREAU: I've heard contrary reports. I've heard that he's not getting a lot of work these days...
Levin and staff took particular issue with Wade claiming it WASN'T repressed memories, but that he just didn't recognize (at age 22) that it was abuse.
Levin then read Robson's 2005 transcript on-air where he was asked very targeted questions that dismantle his new arguments.
LEVIN: When Wade testifies in 05 @ 22 years old he's testifying in a trial where the whole premise is it's wrong to do what allegedly happened to him—he knows he's not going to go to jail when he's 22—doesn't make any sense.
"Comes off like he's lying again, lying & lying..."
Levin reiterated the unlikeliness of this being normal victim behavior based on Wade's interview & sworn testimony.
Also LEVIN: When he said "this is not about money"🤔that's WHY you file a creditor's claim. You're filing for money. Ultimately it's about money. It's about dough.
The fact that in 2013, TMZ (one of the most MJ-hate filled gossip sites) repeatedly denounced the allegations says a lot.
Similarly, Piers Morgan was one of the few hosts to actually grill Dan with honest questions.
Sometimes even hosts with tabloid roots call a spade a spade.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: With Safechuck's case on appeal again, here's a brief analysis of Finaldi's 2018-2019 appeals using his own briefs and filings.
Many of these same arguments will repeat in his new appeal—although there are a few material differences between the 2018 ruling and 2020's.
In 2017, the judge's dismissal of James' case was based largely on the statute of limitations. During his appeal, AB 218 was passed that negated these limitations on CSA cases, so it was reversed.
In 2020, Judge Young dismissed it based on the other irreversibly flawed causes.
A good portion of Finaldi's last appeal was arguing about the timeliness of the filing, since that was the key to its dismissal. Due to AB 218, timeliness is no longer an issue.
James waited 5 years after MJ died to realize his stresses were from "abuse" after seeing Wade on TV.
Finaldi's argument re: Fox/Spence was improperly redacted, allowing one to still read what it says. 😆
And it is nothing but more blind, meaningless conjecture just to try anything he can to depose Spence/Fox.
Here's the unredacted version for Fox.
A big ole nothing-burger.
For Spence, Finaldi argues that because Spence slept in MJ's bedroom and his family got gifts from him, this somehow makes a tie to the "procurement" of CSA with other kids and shows signs of grooming (recall that Wade's allegations actually skip any such "grooming" efforts.) 🤦♂️
While Finaldi keeps fuming over the sanctions imposed against him and the judge's tentative note that his unprofessional conduct toward MJ's counsel could be construed as gender incivility...
He has no problem claiming Spence/Fox were "unwitting parties" to CSA procurement. 🙄
The attorney for Chandler/Marks has classified Finaldi's aggressive tactics as "persistent harassment and invasion of privacy" and in direct contradiction to Finaldi's own suggestion that "alleged victims and their families" shouldn't be obliged to discuss anything with him.
Lily's Attorney: "A cursory examination of Plaintiff’s submission reveals that these arguments lack merit. Instead, the instant motion for reconsideration is nothing more than Plaintiff’s FRIVOLOUS ATTEMPT at a second bite of the proverbial apple."
The judge noted how Finaldi's complaints and arguments were premature and generally insufficient.
Finaldi also "fails to address the reasonableness of the sanctions requested by defense counsel" in his 10 page declaration—he can still try arguing that at tomorrow's hearing.
Once again, the judge points out Finaldi's cited case law in arguments "does not support his contention" against the Court-imposed sanctions.
"The Court concludes that it is appropriate in this matter for sanctions to be awarded against Finaldi based on the plain language..."
THREAD: Dan Reed's motion to quash US subpoenas that he and his production firm received by the estate on Sept. 21, 2020.
Dan has filed a court motion detailing his plans for LN:2 while attempting to quash the estate's subpoenas very recently lodged toward Dan and Amos Pictures.
Dan indicates he has been in LA county for a month "for the sole purpose of filming the proceedings of these cases" and that he will fly back to the UK on October 18, until next March.
He is officially hired by Channel 4 "News & Current Affairs" for the production of LN:Part 2.
For LN:2, Dan alleges it is "about current events taking place partly in public view...an unfolding narrative with multiple points of view. There are multiple parties involved...plaintiffs, defendants, and the Court"
He states it will premiere after the cases have concluded.
Another witness Finaldi hoped would bolster his case based on tabloid tales, but fell flat. She believes MJ was innocent.
Finaldi tossed in Quindoy's tabloid tale that he warned staffers "never leave MJ alone with a kid!" (Quindoys spoke positively of MJ until pay-day after Chandlers, this never happened.)
Gayle confirmed no staff told her any such thing. "That's something I would have remembered."
In another part of Finaldi's reoccurring questioning, he attempts to paint Gayle like all the other staff as "untrained" to know about sexual abuse or report it.
Gayle explains to him that her own son *was* abused by a coach and his demeanor had changed dramatically after.