2/ Regarding A. I'm long $TSLA, believe it isn't a bubble and the naysayers are shortsighted and wrong.

Only time will tell about A, but B we already know - $TSLA joined at an ATH of $695 then fell - but it's now at $763, so it ADDED value, not detracted.

BUT..
3/ But the question of whether $TSLA brings risk to the S&P is WRONG by itself. The whole idea of an INDEX FUND like S&P500 is to be passive, and it's THE ACTIVE MANAGER DECISIONS that introduce risk

Being profitable and large TSLA should have been added ON Q2 EARNINGS.
..
4/ Before we analyze implications, consider this:

DataTrek Research estimates that if on Jan 1 2020 an investor had put $5 of every $100 invested in an S&P 500 ETF into $TSLA, their return by Dec 11 2020 would've increased by roughly 31%!
(more by EOY)
cnbc.com/video/2020/12/…
5/ But that's hypothetical bc $TSLA didn't qualify for S&P at Jan 2020, and 5% is more than its share today.

Tesla DID qualify on Q2 earnings but was admitted after Q3. Comparing 12/21 price ($695) to 9/21 price ($449) is wrong bc by 9/21 price fell after news of not including.
6/ So let's take compare the last day b4 the bad news and compare with 3months forward. 9/4 price was $418, while 11/30 price was $599

I other words, S&P Managers deciding to postpone inclusion despite Tesla meeting requirements, robbed Granny of ~43% rise on every $TSLA dollar
7/ Percentages are misleading. Let's assume just the $181 diff - as if buying $TSLA at $514 instead of $695, then reaping that $181 rise.
at $695 $TSLA was 1.65% of S&P, so at $514 it would've been 1.22% of S&P size, and 1.22% of the shares were robbed of 35% gain
8/ Grandma was robbed by the ACTIVE decision of delaying inclusion. But what next?

Since inclusion, $TSLA rose 10% ON RESULTS, NOT VOLATILITY, in <10 trading days - so S&P gained from inclusion

By me ($TSLA LONG, not investment advice) the future looks even more promising!
9/ S&P should be a passive index and act like one

Manager intervention robbed fund holders of profits, but now that fixed $TSLA is set to be one of the engines pulling the index upwards

MSM POV has shifted accordingly - can't wait to see 01/2021's growth engines do their thing
10/ PS While writing this thread shifted from just charting the "what if"s into a somewhat ideological rant. Sorry, lol, but realizing how the "robbing granny" argument was in fact what robbed grannies, gramps and other honest hardworking people - that got to me. Chill now!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Connecting the Dots⚡🚗🌎🚀🔴 to Disruption✨🏄‍♀️🌟

Connecting the Dots⚡🚗🌎🚀🔴 to Disruption✨🏄‍♀️🌟 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ConnectingODots

8 Jan
THE REAL CASE AGAINST X.COM

@elonmusk PLEASE DON'T
@larryellison
PLEASE DON'T
IMPORTANT MORE THAN MONEY!

@heydave7 suggested a GREAT idea which i OPPOSE.
Watch his vid as well as @stevenmarkryan's and @WR4NYGov's for pros and cons - BUT THIS IS DIFFERENT
1/ Image
2/ i agree with a lot of the points made - and that is why I oppose it. Its strengths are its weakness!

it WILL be the world's largest company. Every engineer, scientist etc. WILL want to work there. It WILL advance the move to occupy Mars.

BUT...
3/ BUT the world's largest company will be stronger than states. It will also be (one of?) the world's largest monopoly, that would be hard to compete with.

I LOVE ELON - BUT WHAT WILL HAPPEN AFTER HIM?

..
Read 8 tweets
7 Jan
OTA UPDATES for OEM CARS
Really?
___
OTA Updates seem like a must, but OEMs are lagging due to several reasons
A. Late to the party
B. Bad Software architecture
C. Bad electrical architecture
D. Dealers...

Cont...
wardsauto.com/dealers/upside…
2/ A is simple. They hadn't tried it until Tesla rammed it down their throats, so are now late to the party

B also simple. Car companies usually hav bad software skills, outsource lots of their SW. ID.3 was bricked due to bad OS. We know that, so let's get on to the new stuff!
3/ C. Bad electrical architecture

You know. Munro presenting the Model 3 VS Bolt, where Bolt has several separate systems for what Tesla uses a unified one? That's true for most cars, ICE included.

Systems are separate and ancient, and only now OEMs are starting to modernise
Read 7 tweets
3 Jan
NOT PLAID, JUST UPDATED

@klwtts spotted a Model S with MFG plate and updates. It looks very butch - but IMHO is just a small refresh, not plaid and not major. Here's why.

Cont..
2/ before everything full disclosure - I'M BIASED against this being a close-to-final plaid. Before battery day i predicted (see vid) that plaid will be part of an all-new model S.

Although POSSIBLE it's imPROBABLE that all new car will look like old.
3/ So if this is final plaid, chances are i'll be proven wrong come release time.

But seeing what I want means digging a deeper hole if debunked, so trying to be objective and commenting what I see.
My 2 cents - refreshed by chrome delete etc like Model 3, that's all for now
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!